Search results

Chance The Rappers new album also was well received, despite receiving heavy backlash in the public. Unfortunately, professional music criticism doesn't really mean much anymore

And it's not going very well from what I've heard

FTFY

Uh where's Vs?

Right, but they were still largely in the Grunge sphere. They just had Metal stylings as opposed to punk or alternative

I have an older sister who bought this CD just for toxic. She played it everyday non-stop on a loop. FOR MONTHS. I will always fucking hate this song.

I remember this song. God it sucks.

Yes for their first two albums anyway. Not in my opinion. No, Nirvana was the only "grunge" act to use a solid punk foundation. Soundgarden and Alice In Chains being examples of notable grunge acts that were pretty distant from punk sonically

How?

Ironically his last name is Beard

But I'm focusing on a specific point. They wanted to have some songs that were "real" and spoke openly about heavy issues and they all come across very sophomoric and cringey.

Apart from band I find McCartneys solo output very lacking

I can see people thinking their a bit open, but they seem to be able to make songs about serious issues that aren't cringey as hell like alot of other bands (SUBLIME)

A Beatles fan that doesn't like Lennon's solowork? Never met one of those! :P. Is there even an opposing opinion to ATMP being the best

As opposed to John "War. Is. Bad. Peace. Is. Good. I'll make 30 songs about this" Lennon?

Imo they were way more of a punk band, with alt rock stylings (especially their early stuff) Pearl Jam's first two albums are a standing refutation to your claim

Trip and Garage were fucking great

Britpop (at least the good stuff was also in the 90's)

Nirvana wasn't grunge

Yes a genre so low that it completely changed popular music and became an integral sound of a generation