January, 2025
Book 1: Patricia Highsmith - Ripley Under Water (1991)

Capping my four year tradition of starting the year with the continuation of the Ripliad series with this fifth and final instalment. Despite generally lacklustre reviews at publication, I found it really entertaining. The sins of Tom's past come back to haunt him with the appearance in town of a nosey American couple looking to dredge up the past. The pacing was good, the tension just right and enough reminders of the past books for new readers and those familiar alike. There's some really taut moments as Tom's future seems to look more uncertain than ever.
Book 2: Paul Auster - Man in the Dark (2008)

This was good. It's a story within a story which sees a man waking in a deep hole and being recruited to fight in an American civil war in an alternate present following Bush's 2000 election win. This turns out to be a story that is being told during his sleepless hours and to himself by an aging writer who, with his daughter and grand-daughter under the same roof, are all suffering their own version of loss or grief. The mission of the man from the hole is to find the writer and kill him to stop the alternate America from existing. It's a bizarre twisty double helix of a tale but, Auster dishes up the puzzle really well and there are some genuinely sad instances of familial grief and love nestled in the writer and his family's narratives.
Book 3: Nilanjana Roy - Black River (2022)

This featured on one of the 'best of' lists posted toward the end of last year in the other thread. I put a bunch of them on my wishlist and this one dropped to 99p a few days later. It's really, really impressive. Ostensibly, it's a murder mystery of a prostitute and an 8 year old girl who witnesses the crime. The story's backdrop of a small Indian farming village on the outskirts of Delhi, a grieving father, the quest for village justice, the corrupt and corruptible, Hindu and Muslim issues all colour the story to perfection lending it an otherworldly feel from another time to readers in the west. Superb and would highly recommend.
Book 4: Fyodor Dostoyevsky - Notes from Underground & The Double (1864 & 1846)

Twofer featuring a novella and a shortish novel. Both concern themselves with a lead character that spends most of their story inside their own head. What would typically be an internal monologue, under Dostoyevsky feels more like a dialogue as these men are seemingly reacting internally against a world that they perceive has it out for them. Both are paranoid, twisted manifestations of men feeling downtrodden and insignificant but, their actions make them seem petty and seriously self-obsessed. Both tough reads to be honest and neither gave me the gut reaction that
Crime and Punishment (my only other Dostoyevsky read) did but, they both do feel equally ahead of their time in their depiction of mental health issues.
Book 5: Patric Gagne - Sociopath: A Memoir (2024)

I really enjoyed this memoir from a self-confessed sociopath who spares no details in describing how she sees herself as different to all around her. From her childhood through to the publication of this book, Gagne lays bare herself and her condition along with her methods of dealing with it. Just as interesting as I found the book has been reading some of the vitriolic reviews from armchair psychologists who find their many faults with the memoir. I dare say there's some grounds for criticism if you had confused this with a self-help manual or clinical text-book but, it isn't either of those things and some of the keyboard warriors' sputum really comes across as a serious lack of empathy ironically enough for someone who was born to think differently but, was fortunate enough to be born into wealth. I found it to be a fascinating insight into one person's experiences.
Book 6: Haruki Murakami - Norwegian Wood (1987)

This one surprised me. It was a country mile different to the previous Murakami books I'd read. The detailed and difficult relationships surrounding a barely 20 year old boy made for captivating reading. I suppose we all feel like we're swimming through treacle at that age but boy, I'm glad I didn't have to deal with some of the complexities and tragedies this kid did. Heart-breaking at times but really tender how he tries to do right by those in his life that are struggling. It never felt cloying though as he retains a human instinct for some level of selfishness in order to be more than simply a bolster to others.
Book 7: Rachel Cusk - Parade (2024)

I really like Rachel Cusk's books and her writing is impeccable but, I did find this one a bit tough at times. As always, her characters are wonderfully developed and seem all too real, speaking wonderfully natural dialogue (albeit quite cultured and highbrow being largely artists and their sphere of influence) and they do interesting things and lead interesting lives. But, there are lots of characters (including multiple artists all named simply, G), appearing across the four chapters that seem like they could/should possibly be connected and yet, there simply wasn't enough meat on the bones to allow my little brain to clearly make those connections, ultimately leaving me with a bit of a soup of characters and no bread to mop them up with. True to form though, the book isn't a complete loss because Cusk raises as many philosophical questions about life, love, family and art as all her characters are capable of and it leaves an imprint on the reader as you're left mulling them over.
Book 8: Ian McEwan - Enduring Love (1997)

Really good, probably my favourite McEwan so far. A chance encounter amidst a tragedy leads a troubled man to perceive a passing glance from another man as an indication of love and in turn become dangerously infatuated with him. Based on a real but rare psychological disorder, Erotomania or de Clérambault's syndrome, McEwan tells of the strain on an existing relationship when the third party infiltrates their lives. The third act slides dangerously close to becoming a Hollywood ending with the acquisition of a gun through an underground connection but, McEwan just about makes that work. The book is complete with an appendix, medical journal case history style, that tracks what we've just read and hints at future events for the affected couple not featured in the main story. According to wikipedia, the appendix fooled many readers it seems as being a real case history, apparently including the NYT who criticized McEwan for having "simply stuck too close to the facts". The false study is credited to Drs Wenn and Camia, an anagram of Ian McEwan! Nice touch.