2025 Reading Challenge

Ok, I made a reading list for myself from other lists and books/authors I had already been thinking about.
These all won't be this year, but between my local library, borrow from friends, and maybe a couple purchases I'll get into this list as the year progresses.
(going to post this in the general reading thread too)

I'd love to hear any input you folks have on these; which ones are absolutely epic, or snoozefests, or whatever.

Thomas Hardy - Tess of the d'Urbervilles
Thomas Pynchon - Gravity's Rainbow
Iris Murdoch - The Sea, The Sea
Graham Greene - Brighton Rock
Virginia Wolfe - Mrs Dalloway
William Faulkner - The Sound and the Fury
Raymond Chandler - The Big Sleep
Kazou Ishiguro - where to start?
Paul Auster - where to start?
Brighton Rock is really good and has one of the meanest antagonists I’ve read. Because it could just as easily be a modern gangster story, it can seem a bit dated at times and Greene’s return to Catholic guilt is a bit bewildering if you weren’t brought up under such a regime. Good and quick read though.

Mrs Dalloway is magnificent but, hands down the most difficult book I’ve ever read. I read Ulysses a few years afterwards and had it suggested early on that there’s more enjoyment to be had if you allow the prose to simply wash over you and mentally pick up again when your brain allows you to re-engage. I truly think that did help with Ulysses and suspect it would have with parts of Mrs Dalloway too. As it was, I found myself repeatedly going back on myself to try and make full sense of another person’s train of thought. That had its own rewards but be prepared to spend at least twice the time you normally would on a book it’s size.

I preferred Remains of the Day over Never Let Me Go, which I found a stilted read (there’s good narrative reason for this) and rather overrated. RotD is just a wonderful exploration into a changing world through the eyes of a few people who are struggling to adapt. As someone who has felt a little like that myself, this one really spoke to me.

I’m just a couple away from finishing my Auster bibliography read-through. I’ve found myself enjoying his later period books much more. For want of a better way to describe them, they’re slightly more mainstream and slightly less up their own arse. It’s funny because I read many of the earlier works back in the 90s when I was in my early 20s and loved them so, Auster’s style of metafiction either appeals more to a younger, possibly more experimental brain or, acceptance of slightly pretentious bullshit diminishes as we get older.

I’ve only read V from Pynchon and whilst I didn’t dislike it, it didn’t blow me away and to be honest, in my mind suffered from some of what I’ve written about Auster insomuch as it felt like it was trying to be a bit too clever for its own good. I’m honestly not against smart writing and smart writers, quite the opposite but, I do think V was one of those books that perhaps ignores the pleasure a reader gets from actually understanding just a bit about what is going on! I’ve half a dozen other Pynchons in my kindle library but every time I think about opening one, I’m reminded that I’ve also got hundreds of other books that are less likely to frustrate me.
 
Are you familiar with Pynchon or other postmodern stuff? If not it's kinda hard to describe.

There's barely a plot, more like a general self aware vibe it has of itself. It runs the gamut from like ultra mathematical impenetrable descriptions of missle tech to hilariously grotesque, sexually explicit asides. It's a very funny book, but can also be devastatingly beautiful, or kind of disturbing. I took it as trying to contextualize the chaos of the 20th century but even that is probably reductive. It was one of the first books to be called an encyclopedic novel, i.e. does a little bit of everything: Encyclopedic novel - Wikipedia

My advice is to treat it like poetry, you are 100% not going to understand it all, there's just no way, but just keep reading, and let the general vibe or feeling it give you shape of the work. That's worked really well for me and Infinite Jest (less than 300 pages left!)
This is pretty bang on. You look at the first chapter and its soldiers growing bananas in London and you kinda think it’s going to be a laugh but you get to the second and quickly realise it’s absolutely not. One of my mates once described Pynchon to me as ‘James Joyce if he’s left the last couple of shots in the bottle’ which is both really unfair and also really accurate.
 
Ok, I made a reading list for myself from other lists and books/authors I had already been thinking about.
These all won't be this year, but between my local library, borrow from friends, and maybe a couple purchases I'll get into this list as the year progresses.
(going to post this in the general reading thread too)

I'd love to hear any input you folks have on these; which ones are absolutely epic, or snoozefests, or whatever.

Thomas Hardy - Tess of the d'Urbervilles
Thomas Pynchon - Gravity's Rainbow
Iris Murdoch - The Sea, The Sea
Graham Greene - Brighton Rock
Virginia Wolfe - Mrs Dalloway
William Faulkner - The Sound and the Fury
Raymond Chandler - The Big Sleep
Kazou Ishiguro - where to start?
Paul Auster - where to start?
As mentioned by others, Gravity's Rainbow is incredibly difficult, probably the most difficult book I've read. And as @ayayrawn said, it is not a very good place to start with Pynchon. (The Crying of Lot 49 or Inherent Vice are much quicker and give you a good idea of his sort of thing.)

But hard disagree that it's only worth reading to say you've read it. That's bullshit. It can be very rewarding if you can put in the work, are willing occasionally to get very frustrated and confused, do outside research and potentially follow a reader's guide (there are several).

I like his later work better for a variety of reasons, but I highly recommend anyone up for a challenge give Rainbow a go—or two, or as many as it takes.

The Sound and the Fury is also quite difficult, though the first section is the hardest because of its perspective. (Each section is from a different character.) Have you read any other Faulkner before? Again, I'd start elsewhere.
 
I’ve only read V from Pynchon and whilst I didn’t dislike it, it didn’t blow me away and to be honest, in my mind suffered from some of what I’ve written about Auster insomuch as it felt like it was trying to be a bit too clever for its own good. I’m honestly not against smart writing and smart writers, quite the opposite but, I do think V was one of those books that perhaps ignores the pleasure a reader gets from actually understanding just a bit about what is going on! I’ve half a dozen other Pynchons in my kindle library but every time I think about opening one, I’m reminded that I’ve also got hundreds of other books that are less likely to frustrate me.
I cannot recommend Mason & Dixon highly enough, FYI! Probably the finest novel I have ever read, not totally baffling in the way many of his novels are (though it certainly has its own challenges: getting used to 18th-century writing style takes a while). It is essentially a buddy road novel.

V. was his first novel and he wrote it when he was quite young, so you can imagine why it might come across as a little too smart for its own good. He gets better.
 
We went on a long walk between towns over the weekend but not before stopping into a charity bookshop.

I picked up 3 Murakami books that I was missing ("Pinball, 1973", "Blind Willow, Sleeping Woman", and "What I Talk About When I Talk About Running"), a Jack Reacher ("The Secret" by Lee Child & Andrew Grant), The Maze Runner (enjoyed the film despite it being aimed towards the teen market). So plenty to read.

And to reiterate I bought these BEFORE we went walking....
 
We went on a long walk between towns over the weekend but not before stopping into a charity bookshop.

I picked up 3 Murakami books that I was missing ("Pinball, 1973", "Blind Willow, Sleeping Woman", and "What I Talk About When I Talk About Running"), a Jack Reacher ("The Secret" by Lee Child & Andrew Grant), The Maze Runner (enjoyed the film despite it being aimed towards the teen market). So plenty to read.

And to reiterate I bought these BEFORE we went walking....
Have you seen the Vintage Editions Murikami represses? Handsome jackets on them!
 
Book six

IMG_5522.jpeg

Felt almost destined to never read this having lost 3 copies previously without actually cracking it open (one loaned to a friend on holiday who then took it home with him, one left in an airport lounge, one in a bag that got pinched off a bus). Having blasted through it I’m not sure I’ll read a better book this year. It’s spectacularly good. I read DeWitt’s debut when it was first released and also enjoyed it but I’ve punted through 300 of pages of this in a couple of sittings. The story is good but the characters and narration make the book. And it’s funny too. In a slightly morbid way but actually laugh out loud funny.

Most will have read this already I’m sure but anyone who hasn’t should get all over it.
 
February, 2025

Book 9: Nicola Barker - Darkmans (2007)

IMG_2974.jpeg
I spent a hefty chunk of the month with this 850pp monster but it was most definitely worth it. It's a book that I'm not sure I have anything to compare it with. There's a whole lot of strange happening amongst the mundane lives of the good people of Ashford, Kent as the story draws from my country's long and dark history and brings it right into the present day lives of a core group of ordinary people. Barker plays with language and even makes the development of language a narrative feature which was pretty exciting to read and avoided feeling overly academic. Good one, this. Would recommend.

Book 10: Paul Auster - Invisible (2009)
IMG_2975.jpeg
I feel like I'm enjoying Auster's books more, the closer I get to completing his canon. Common Auster elements like the story-within-a-story, a mystery to solve and the positioning of an author in a lead role are present here but, this felt like a much easier and less pretentious read than many of his earlier books. The complexities are present but, they come more from the switching of narrator throughout, and indeed the person and tense their section of the story employs. Not one for people who like a nicely wrapped up story as this one, like one of the European movies the characters discuss, is very open-ended and as such, leaves as many questions and doubts about the events told and indeed the reliability of any of the narrators and the characters they depict.

Book 11: Marilynne Robinson - Housekeeping (1980)
IMG_2976.jpeg
Mesmerising writing in this debut novel that tells of a family, (focusing largely on one of the young girls), who seem besieged by misfortune resulting in an off-the-grid life that eventually rattles the rest of the local society. In some ways I found the principle story reminiscent of Where the Crawdads Sing that I'd read not too long ago but, where the story probably won out there, it's Robinson's impressive prose that wins out here, every sentence being loaded with immaculate form and purpose. Really good, my first Marilynne Robinson but undoubtedly not my last.

Book 12: Patrick Süskind - Perfume: The Story of a Murderer (1985, Trans: John E. Woods, 1986)
IMG_2977.jpeg
Very enjoyable, very entertaining and very well written and translated. It somewhat lost its way for me in the middle section when the antagonist takes a seven year Siddarthaesque solitary sojourn into the mountains but quickly recovered once he had re-entered society and restarted his hunt for victims. The real winner for me was the super detailed and presumably well-researched descriptions of the ways in which scents are extracted and recorded in their various mediums to provide us with marketed perfumes. Really fascinating read.
 
Back
Top