Selaws
Well-Known Member
The Great British what now???Well, as someone who’s seen several episodes of The Great British Baking Show and who googled to double check before initially replying, I say it’s Proofs.
The Great British what now???Well, as someone who’s seen several episodes of The Great British Baking Show and who googled to double check before initially replying, I say it’s Proofs.
Guru's, looking to replace my copy of Sticky Fingers with a "Zipper" version of some sort, lol.
Is the MoFi the way to go? OG? Other......if memory serves, wasn't there a newer version released with a zipper? Anyway, need your help
The Great British what now???
This is exactly why I'm asking @Joe Mac, I don't think this is an LP you need to spend a ton on.............just want the zipper on a "decent" pressing, lolOne thing with this album, it’s deliberately grimy, it won’t ever sound hifi, I wouldn’t go spending big bucks chasing perfection.
It's "Baking Show" in the US for copyright reasons.Maybe he means bake off
Thats interesting. And technically accurateIt's "Baking Show" in the US for copyright reasons.
I have no desire to ever have the zipper. It will just need its own storage spot. It’s a cool idea and all. Maybe if I were a bigger Stones fan.This is exactly why I'm asking @Joe Mac, I don't think this is an LP you need to spend a ton on.............just want the zipper on a "decent" pressing, lol
How does one trademark words. Smh.It's "Baking Show" in the US for copyright reasons.
Guru's, looking to replace my copy of Sticky Fingers with a "Zipper" version of some sort, lol.
Is the MoFi the way to go? OG? Other......if memory serves, wasn't there a newer version released with a zipper? Anyway, need your help
Pillsbury held a "bake off" in the 20th century and never let the trademark go I guess.How does one trademark words. Smh.
Im just saying, why is this allowed? If some one else decides to do a “Pilsbury Bake-Off” wouldn’t they be able to sue for you know lying about being Pilsbury or something. No one else can have a bake off because the dough boy is that important?Pillsbury held a "bake off" in the 20th century and never let the trademark go I guess.
Because copyright/trademark law in the States is weird.Im just saying, why is this allowed? If some one else decides to do a “Pilsbury Bake-Off” wouldn’t they be able to sue for you know lying about being Pilsbury or something. No one else can have a bake off because the dough boy is that important?
Im just saying, why is this allowed? If some one else decides to do a “Pilsbury Bake-Off” wouldn’t they be able to sue for you know lying about being Pilsbury or something. No one else can have a bake off because the dough boy is that important?
i don’t care enough to research further but it would seem the term started to be used in the 30s and Pilsbury trademarked in the 40s when they started their competition.If they coined the term, then can trademark it. There are nuances, but it's how it works. If people start using it later, doesn't make a difference. In fact, all the power to them for having coined an excellent mark.
i don’t care enough to research further but it would seem the term started to be used in the 30s and Pilsbury trademarked in the 40s when they started their competition.
Patents/copyrights make sense to me. I worked and made something. Other people shouldn’t be able to profit off my workTrademarks are weird... you can lose them and others can take them over if you don't use them or aggressively protect them (which is different from patents and copyrights). It's usually harder though to trademark phrases that are in common usage. Obviously, I wouldn't know what the situation was in the 30's and 40's. Suffice to say that if they didn't have solid ground, someone else would battle it in court. There can be so much money involved in these things, it's crazy.
(full disclosure in case you didn't know, I work in patents - but I only have a passing knowledge of trademarks.)
Patents/copyrights make sense to me. I worked and made something. Other people shouldn’t be able to profit off my work
Im not necessarily against trademarking. It just doesn’t seem like “bake-off” should meet the criteria.But ideas and slogans involve work and are something. It’s not that nebulous. Long out of use ones remaining protected would be odd but I’d bet that it’s easier and cheaper for show producers to just change the name than engage the lawyers to even consider challenging.
Is that one bad? I think it was pretty $$ last I checked on cogs so as long as it sounds okay…For those that care, the new “Interscope High Fidelity” The Sundays - Reading, Writing and Arithmetic is the same played as the RSD from last year.