I'll wait until my formal annoncement tomorrow to elaborate, but this statement is ridiculous.yet another cover album
I'll wait until my formal annoncement tomorrow to elaborate, but this statement is ridiculous.yet another cover album
Just worth noting that calling a classical performance of a composition a cover is just really weird and illogical. There isn't an "original performance" of a composition. In classical music that was actually written after the advent of recorded music (unlike The Four Seasons) it is pretty rare that anyone considers the first performance or the first recorded performance of it to be "the best" and calling a different group of performers' rendition of a composition a cover is just wrong.Deb's disdain for covers is well known in the JQBX. His quarrels lie when an artist does an "empty" cover of something, changing almost nothing about the original to justify making a cover. This record appears to be more of a reinterpretation of the material rather than just a straight cover from what I've read about it. I admit I've not gotten the time to sit down with it yet myself, and apparently neither had Deb when he wrote his message earlier judging by the wording, but as someone who tends to agree with his feelings on covers to a certain degree, I understand the hesitancy.
I myself, not really being a fan of classical music, am going to go in with an open mind. Because I wouldn't call myself a jazz fan, but I enjoyed Mark de Clive-Lowe. I wouldn't call myself a flamenco fan, but I enjoyed Camaron. I wouldn't call myself a fan of Irish music, but I enjoyed The Gloaming. I've learned to trust this club and all of the picks, even in genres I wouldn't have sought out myself, have been phenomenal, so I won't knock anything before I try it.
Just worth noting that calling a classical performance of a composition a cover is just really weird and illogical. There isn't an "original performance" of a composition. In classical music that was actually written after the advent of recorded music (unlike The Four Seasons) it is pretty rare that anyone considers the first performance or the first recorded performance of it to be "the best" and calling a different group of performers' rendition of a composition a cover is just wrong.
Edit:I don't think that directly applies here anyway, as this is a derivation/edit and a different thing from another performance of a composition entirely.
Yeah, exactly. And to take that analogy further, classical music performers aren't in it to record music, certainly not to record only original music, just like theater actors. They are first and foremost live art forms and sometimes happen to be recorded.Completely with all the moving parts and and the way the compositions act much more as a whole in telling a story, rather than as parts that are also, or perhaps mainly, written as individual songs, makes it more akin to seeing a play with different casts, no one calls the lastest performance of a Shakespeare play at the globe a cover!
Yeah, exactly. And to take that analogy further, classical music performers aren't in it to record music, certainly not to record only original music, just like theater actors. They are first and foremost live art forms and sometimes happen to be recorded.
Fuck it, ordered the 2 LP version. Even if it isn't this I'm happy.
Oddly enough a quick glance at Discogs suggested the single LP version is actually more expensive than the 2xLP.I ordered the 2 LP version without even being aware there was another version.
For me, Richter’s Four Seasons is to Vivaldi’s as 10 Things I Hate About You is to The Taming of the Shrew. The basics are there, but it ain’t the same thing.
Too lazy to look it upOddly enough a quick glance at Discogs suggested the single LP version is actually more expensive than the 2xLP.
¯\_(ツ)_/¯What's the difference between the two versions?
Too lazy to look it up
In all seriousness, the only difference I can see is that the 2xLP has an extra disc of bonus material and remixes. The single LP pressing from a few years earlier isn't on color vinyl and it doesn't say anything about it being limited edition or being a more "audiophile" pressing or anything. I'm willing to peg it as the 2xLP just being more common.
Yeah, considering the album itself is only 40ish minutes from what I can tell, it'd be a bit much to spread it across 2 LPs, unless you're really going for the audiophile market. So there's some extra stuff