CrazyDiamond84
Well-Known Member
Lol, I'm sorry...you could have been a crazy photo snob that might care, idk!i have no idea either , failed joke i guess
Lol, I'm sorry...you could have been a crazy photo snob that might care, idk!i have no idea either , failed joke i guess
It's not much. Mine was about $10 AUD for a 473ml bottle. It'll last you a long time based on how much you use. I got my from a specialist Photographic supply store. I actually spent more on express shipping for it to get hereOk? I don't even know what the stuff is, or who'd sell it. I have no interest in spending a fortune on it.
Photo-flo is basically the same concept, right? Seems easier to find around here as I ordered a bottle off amazon.
support your local Photo-flo dealer ffs !!
It's a solution used in film developing. Any photography supply shop should have it. I got a bottle for $12.99 locally.Ok? I don't even know what the stuff is, or who'd sell it. I have no interest in spending a fortune on it.
Is it even ultrasonic???No no, it's definitely because the HG uses less power.
Give me gin and tonicIs it even ultrasonic???
those French!Arse Biscuits
View attachment 119960
Reviewing for a large audience is kind of a fine art. I'm sure they're trying but, unfortunately, sometimes - due to lack of inherent talent, experience, time, etc - people produce shitty reviews.These positive feedbacks are really confusing. Doesn't at all line up with the shitty youtube reviews.
I knew what you meantShitty in the sense that their assessment of the unit's performance was that it was shitty. That doesn't jibe with the opinions here.
Honestly I would trust the opinions of posters on here before I would look to YouTube. Bad reviews get a lot more clicks than good reviews, and that's what pays the bills for these guys to a large degree. Nothing is going to work miracles, even with existing machines that cost five times the price you still have to do a pre clean with really dirty records, it's simply not going to get them totally clean after one run, nothing will. I have a Okki Nokki and I'll do a clean and rinse cycle on every disc, that's brushing every disc with the motor running clockwise, then counter clockwise for 5 revolutions. And then rinsing the same way, and even then I still have to do a second clean in some cases with really stubborn dirt. And that's with actual physical contact on the disc. With Ultrasonic it's simply not going to get those really really dirty records clean after a single run in many cases.Shitty in the sense that their assessment of the unit's performance was that it was shitty. That doesn't jibe with the opinions here.
I think if you don’t go in expecting a Degritter for 1/10th the cost you’ll probably be happy with it. I find very little to complain about at the price point.Shitty in the sense that their assessment of the unit's performance was that it was shitty. That doesn't jibe with the opinions here.
What else would a degritter do for me as far as a clean record goes? that's what i'm trying to pin down.I think if you don’t go in expecting a Degritter for 1/10th the cost you’ll probably be happy with it. I find very little to complain about at the price point.