Im sure this has been talked about in the past, and I dont want to start something which could be seen as controversial, but can the MMJ pressings (or any later reissues for that matter) actually be 'better' than the original pressings? I mean from a purely technical point of view (over the opinion of "that's what the musician agreed to and therefore is most faithful" argument). I know some albums might have audible phantom sounds which could be edited out nowadays, but in terms of the actual sounds you are hearing, can these really be improved? Or is it a case of the levels being edited to obtain a clearer recording (free of background/ambient noise)?
If we take something like 'Blue Train', I have a '73 UA pressing which I always thought as being great, but I also have a '57 first press and it blows it out of the water. Now its obviously great to have a first press, but if the MMJ is somehow even better then it kind of makes more sense to hunt these down over OG's right? In terms of the audio quality at least.
Not sure if I have expressed this correctly but hopefully it makes sense?