Yeah, it's a little sloppy and I think it misses the mark, but here's kind of how I'm seeing it.
It's for people with money that want VMP to curate their record collection for them. They listen to indie bands and have "eclectic" tastes, but really just hover within the same parameters of what is played on non-commercial radio stations like KEXP. It's kind of like how SUB POP is considered a indie label, but Warner Bros owns 49% of the company. They only go so far off the grid and are still fairly tethered.
Even by looking over that Day Of The Dead box, I could pick more names of artists whose takes I'd be interested in hearing about regarding the Dead. Having some dude from Dirty Projectors or someone from the Decemberists talk about them is not a selling point.
I remember 15 years ago, when the psych rock revival was really starting to gain some traction and talking about how ridiculous it was to me that there was still so much aversion to the Grateful Dead. People were starting to embrace this throwback sound, but continuing to completely dismiss some of the primary architects. It seems like a lot of people can't remember that the Dead were still considered "uncool" and something to run from. But, shortly after, their legacy started to infiltrate that scene and then, almost overnight, they were given props. Even if you didn't listen to them, it was a good idea to wear a shirt. I saw images of some high fashion runway show recently where they all had on tour Tees.
Even now, when some people are explaining that they dismissed the Dead it was because they knew people that also liked Phish. The Dead's stigma was the same as the one with Phish, if not worse Phish actually took on some of it that they still retain, after the Dead has shaken it. That's because, prior to recently, people who listened to the Dead were considered a certain type of person. Once you start to see that the music reaches beyond that small stereotype, it's harder to argue that case.
So, now there is an acknowledgement that they overlooked the Dead for whatever reason, but for a lot of us, that still feels relatively new. That same blank dismissal that Phish gets was applied to the Grateful Dead FOREVER. They represented some hippie bullshit that nobody wanted to be associated with. All of that "When the drugs run out, people realize they are listening to a shitty band" rhetoric was standard. So, now all the same demographic of kids who 15-20 years ago wouldn't be caught "dead" even admitting that they liked a GD song are existing in a time period where the world has embraced them, and I'm sure some of that comes over time with their own heroes signaling to them that it's okay now.
For that reason, the Day Of The Dead box was probably a better introduction to the group than this thing, because it broke down those barriers in a way that showed a lot more reverence and care than I may have otherwise expected from it. You could tell that the people behind it really cared. The VMP release seems like it's targeting the same crowd, but with a less effective delivery. The price is obviously a huge difference and the Day Of The Dead box actually delivered something new. This is old stuff and most of it fairly easy to acquire. Then, you just have Jim James showing up to tell you why it's cool. Oh, and Hunter from Soundtribe, who most people won't even know who the fuck he is.
Merits of the box aside, this seems like a totally reasonable way of exploring new music to me. If anything, I’d be more concerned with Spotify pigeonholing music tastes and reinforcing established preferences — the whole “You listened to Radiohead? Here are 12 more artists that sound almost exactly like them” kinda thing. If someone wants to explore different styles of music, that’s a good thing as far as I’m concerned, regardless of how they go about it.Storf personifies VMP- in the vibe that it's a bunch of Spotify surfers stumbling upon bands for the first time, wiki cramming as much as they can in half an hour then acting like they know what the fuck the are talking about. It bleeds through in everything he writes and says. And reading through Reddit it's not hard to see that this is reflective in the younger culture of music listeners that never had to organically grow their musical knowledge.
If you're getting into the Dead for the first time, and are doing it on vinyl, I'd recommend getting Workingman's Dead and American Beauty first. I'd follow with the three live albums: Live/Dead, Skull & Roses, and Europe '72. Depends on your musical tastes as to which one I would recommend.Out on this box. Gonna buy a few that interest me now then get the rest on black when they inevitably reissue it down the road if I still want them.
Which Live album would y'all say is essential? Live Dead?
I think this is my plan. I’m finally happy with my digital setup at home so will get an album or two on vinyl (rhino release or maybe a MoFi if I can get a good deal) and listen to any live digitally. Thanks to all for the suggestions. Maybe it’s time for a N&G vinyl box set to go live...If you're getting into the Dead for the first time, and are doing it on vinyl, I'd recommend getting Workingman's Dead and American Beauty first. I'd follow with the three live albums: Live/Dead, Skull & Roses, and Europe '72. Depends on your musical tastes as to which one I would recommend.
Mind though, that vinyl isn't the best way to get into them. If you listen digitally or on CD, I'd skip the live step above and skip directly to Dick's Picks Volume 4 and 8, Sunshine Daydream (Veneta '72), Cornell 77, and Wake Up To Find Out (3/29/90). Wouldn't recommend full live shows on vinyl to start due to format.
The WD and AB Mofis are 2lp, 45 rpm and sound amazing. I would recommend both, even at 50 a pop.I think this is my plan. I’m finally happy with my digital setup at home so will get an album or two on vinyl (rhino release or maybe a MoFi if I can get a good deal) and listen to any live digitally. Thanks to all for the suggestions. Maybe it’s time for a N&G vinyl box set to go live...
Out on this box. Gonna buy a few that interest me now then get the rest on black when they inevitably reissue it down the road if I still want them.
Which Live album would y'all say is essential? Live Dead?
Merits of the box aside, this seems like a totally reasonable way of exploring new music to me. If anything, I’d be more concerned with Spotify pigeonholing music tastes and reinforcing established preferences — the whole “You listened to Radiohead? Here are 12 more artists that sound almost exactly like them” kinda thing. If someone wants to explore different styles of music, that’s a good thing as far as I’m concerned, regardless of how they go about it.
Reckoning is great, but so unreflective of the other 29 years of the band. For newbies, they need to get their feet wet with some of the improvisational aspect of the band to see if they're going to be a Head or not.Europe 72 is great, but for me it will always be Reckoning.
Europe 72 is great, but for me it will always be Reckoning.
With all due respect, there’s really no band I would drop $450 to “get in to.” If anything I would get an album, or stream their stuff, but would never be able to justify $450 on someone I never could get into or haven’t listened to. And with the Dead, there’s usually a reason why people don’t like them. It’s really not for everyone.Thank you. Agreed on all counts.
I dont care how people discover new music, as long as they do discover new music. Theres so much good stuff out there, its impossible to get into everything. Ive been a been a big music fan all my life and of course I know who the grateful dead is, I just never got into them for multiple reasons. This seems like a great setup for it.
But I also realize Im in a fortunate position financially. I dont really know if its the best strategy to make a set meant for people trying to get into the grateful dead and price it at $400+ and then make 7500 of them.
Merits of the box aside, this seems like a totally reasonable way of exploring new music to me. If anything, I’d be more concerned with Spotify pigeonholing music tastes and reinforcing established preferences — the whole “You listened to Radiohead? Here are 12 more artists that sound almost exactly like them” kinda thing. If someone wants to explore different styles of music, that’s a good thing as far as I’m concerned, regardless of how they go about it.
You missed my point. The Beatles Mono box is 14 albums redone to perfection with a beautiful hardbound book and is the current crown Jewel of classic rock.
This is an 8 album cash grab of nothing new or anything we won't see again.
I wasn't giving a warning not to miss out
With all due respect, there’s really no band I would drop $450 to “get in to.” If anything I would get an album, or stream their stuff, but would never be able to justify $450 on someone I never could get into or haven’t listened to. And with the Dead, there’s usually a reason why people don’t like them. It’s really not for everyone.
That being said, I hope you enjoy it!
And with the Dead, there’s usually a reason why people don’t like them. It’s really not for everyone.
where is this (I assume) awesome gem at?Maybe this is $450 because they had to pay Bill Walton to do the promo video for it. You know Walton doesn't work for free.
I wouldn't be surprised for that to be the case.Just looking at the details on this. Chris Bellman did all the Rhino Remasters from 2011 at BG Mastering, which is the same thing this box set is advertising... are we to assume these are simply those same masters? But pressed at QRP instead of RTI?