Fam. All he did was compare the three pressings he owned (the 2015
Newbury one he got was defective) and he revealed the differences he found. You can choose not to believe him, but his stance is incredibly reasonable if you just look at the reviews for each of the pressings that he mentioned and then compare pictures of the packaging.
His sound-quality review of the
VMP vs
NB pressings wasn't crazy. He basically said that the
VMP one had a slightly lower volume, which allowed for higher dynamics (something I can confirm
VMP's pressing had.) Nothing huge.
He also said that
VMP's vinyl was the heaviest of the bunch, so if you wanna hold him at gunpoint and force him to take pictures of each record on a scale just to confirm that he wasn't lying about fucking vinyl weight (lmfao) then go ahead.
Also, a big part of the review was the packaging, of which he said
VMP had the best. This is obviously subjective, but nothing he said in that regard was even remotely suspicious. I mean, he
literally started the thread with a picture of the
NB press and the
VMP press side-by-side.
And you don't need to be an expert to compare sound quality and packaging quality when you have everything in front of you. Implying that he'd need to be "qualified" to review vinyl pressings is tonedeaf of you, considering we're on a forum full of people that likely have reviewed a vinyl pressing at least once and posted it here with the aim of informing people on the pressing's quality. You could argue that comparing pressings requires more expertise than reviewing a single pressing, but it wasn't like he went super in-depth on the differences between
NB and
VMP's pressings. He listed one small difference in the sound quality.
In fact, he actually posted his anticipations of the
VMP press a month ago, and he said that he didn't see any reason why it'd be better than
Newbury's in terms of sound. He posted this under a review of the
VMP Bandana press, which he actually reviewed really negatively.
See below:
View attachment 22966
tl;dr ok boomer