Vinyl Me Please (store, exclusives, swaps, etc)

Even theirs? Last years curation was a dumpster fire, especially in the normally reliable classics....
I
Even theirs? Last years curation was a dumpster fire, especially in the normally reliable classics....
i actually really liked about 60-70 percent of the classics picks this year . Loved Al Green, Isleys, Nat Turner , BB , Buddy, Blakey, and Brubeck. Missed Blossom but it’s really grown on me . The others I swapped for Floyd, Mavis, Banks, and a few others, I’m forgetting. So all in all I mostly enjoyed the curation this year.
 
I

i actually really liked about 60-70 percent of the classics picks this year . Loved Al Green, Isleys, Nat Turner , BB , Buddy, Blakey, and Brubeck. Missed Blossom but it’s really grown on me . The others I swapped for Floyd, Mavis, Banks, and a few others, I’m forgetting. So all in all I mostly enjoyed the curation this year.

60-70% is a weak strike rate for me in such an expensive pursuit.
 
what isn’t subjective is that it’s been disgustingly unbalanced and had two of the poorest records (Miller and Bobo) that I’ve ever heard anyone describe as “curated”.

I liked both those records quite a bit and think they’re definitely different than anything in my collection, so the curation continues to work for me. To each their own though
 
Last edited:
There's some law in the UK that if someone comments how good a product is, and they've received it for free, then legally they also need to indicate that they received the product for free.

It's something to do with the Advertising Standards Authority and Competition & Markets Authority.

We've all seen the amazon reviews saying "great product which was sent to me for free" etc.

Similarly, would Nathan would need to declare that he's received vmp products for free if he says anything positive about those vmp products from now on....?
 
There's some law in the UK that if someone comments how good a product is, and they've received it for free, then legally they also need to indicate that they received the product for free.

It's something to do with the Advertising Standards Authority and Competition & Markets Authority.

We've all seen the amazon reviews saying "great product which was sent to me for free" etc.

Similarly, would Nathan would need to declare that he's received vmp products for free if he says anything positive about those vmp products from now on....?

He’s going to comment positively on them if he gets them for free or not so I don’t think it will make a difference.

If I was to get free items however you can guarantee I will give my impartial and unbiased five star review of their must buy products.
 
There's some law in the UK that if someone comments how good a product is, and they've received it for free, then legally they also need to indicate that they received the product for free.

It's something to do with the Advertising Standards Authority and Competition & Markets Authority.

We've all seen the amazon reviews saying "great product which was sent to me for free" etc.

Similarly, would Nathan would need to declare that he's received vmp products for free if he says anything positive about those vmp products from now on....?

I think Australia is independent of the Queen these days. I could be wrong though. Like maybe they have a Canada like arrangement, I wouldnt know cause Australia didn't have Kids In the Hall to teach me.
 
Last edited:
There's some law in the UK that if someone comments how good a product is, and they've received it for free, then legally they also need to indicate that they received the product for free.

It's something to do with the Advertising Standards Authority and Competition & Markets Authority.

We've all seen the amazon reviews saying "great product which was sent to me for free" etc.

Similarly, would Nathan would need to declare that he's received vmp products for free if he says anything positive about those vmp products from now on....?
I'm sure that's if they're giving a public review or something on YouTube. I doubt that would apply if it's a comment on a private forum.
 
Back
Top