For official reference
What's going on with India? Anyone know? I'm quite surprised by their low numbers. Their population is huge and there is a large stratification of wealth there.
What's going on with India? Anyone know? I'm quite surprised by their low numbers. Their population is huge and there is a large stratification of wealth there.
What's going on with India? Anyone know? I'm quite surprised by their low numbers. Their population is huge and there is a large stratification of wealth there.
Yes, I fear that too. Not that we treat our lower income any better, but I am thinking of all of the high population/low income villages and slums in the country. The virus is going to decimate those areas. Which kinda prompted my question. Are they just not reporting data? Or are they lying about their data? Or has it honestly not started in those regions yet?Same in many Sub-Saharan African countries. The worst is yet to come for these regions.
What's going on with India? Anyone know? I'm quite surprised by their low numbers. Their population is huge and there is a large stratification of wealth there.
Yes, I fear that too. Not that we treat our lower income any better, but I am thinking of all of the high population/low income villages and slums in the country. The virus is going to decimate those areas. Which kinda prompted my question. Are they just not reporting data? Or are they lying about their data? Or has it honestly not started in those regions yet?
I don't know but just guessing lack of testing, lack of access to medical care, etc.
Given the number of asymptomatic cases that keep coming up... I think Iceland reported that more than half of their positive tests there were no symptoms, it's safe to assume that many many more people are carriers than we can document
What might be the saving grace for many of those countries is the fact that their median age is less than 20. Hopefully that means they will see a much lower percentage of severe symptoms.A few days on the radio they said the main African countries with Covid-19 reported cases are the "richer", basically the countries more open to other countries, that make business with China for example. There were very isolated cases in poorer countries as well, in some there are only one hospital and no equipment to deal with the virus.
Yep, this is what I figured and we are going to keep getting worse because half of America thinks this is no big deal. There is no way we can echo the response of Asian countries given how cavalier we've been over the last week.
I'm not sure what their trajectory will look like. Their demographics skew younger than ours which helps.What's going on with India? Anyone know? I'm quite surprised by their low numbers. Their population is huge and there is a large stratification of wealth there.
Yes, I fear that too. Not that we treat our lower income any better, but I am thinking of all of the high population/low income villages and slums in the country. The virus is going to decimate those areas. Which kinda prompted my question. Are they just not reporting data? Or are they lying about their data? Or has it honestly not started in those regions yet?
NY is most likely going to do this as well. I saw an article yesterday that said they are going to decide in the next 48 hours, and seeing a headline like this makes me think it's inevitable:The entire state of California will go into a shelter in place order at 12:00am tonight local time.