OMC
Well-Known Member
Not often enough to get his monies worth!How often do you think he actually sat down to enjoy music and not just test equipment so he could further refine his set up?
Not often enough to get his monies worth!How often do you think he actually sat down to enjoy music and not just test equipment so he could further refine his set up?
Man where were you when we were talking about this a while back?Why didn’t one of you guys tell me you were being featured in The Washington Post?
He spent his life building a $1 million stereo. The real cost was unfathomable
I was busy building the second best stereo in the lower 48.Man where were you when we were talking about this a while back?
I dunno, I like my system more than I like some of my familyThe moral of this story is be nice to your family, they’re more important than some dumb stereo and I’m glad this utter shits system is now in pieces. Good riddance to bad rubbish.
“Hi-fi is extremely subjective”Why didn’t one of you guys tell me you were being featured in The Washington Post?
He spent his life building a $1 million stereo. The real cost was unfathomable
I believe I’m in a similar boat. I got a shipping notification on 1/9 stating that a label was created, but no movement as of yet. I am beyond excited to get mine.Apologies for derailing the topic of the moment, but I just wanted to take the opportunity to remind folks how great Keith at Darlington Labs is to deal with. My MP-7 was taking longer than expected to ship so I reached out to him. He was prompt and courteous with his reply. It turns out the delay works significantly in my favor and that Keith is very generous.
Loses value the second you drive it off the lot man.The $1 million stereo that sold for $157K.
Interesting story, man seemed like a bit of a dick.
I ordered an MP7 last week. Keith emailed and told me I’d be receiving an MP7B model. An updated version that supports MC and it would be about 3 weeks to deliver.I believe I’m in a similar boat. I got a shipping notification on 1/9 stating that a label was created, but no movement as of yet. I am beyond excited to get mine.
It looks pretty sweet. You can always add a node if you need the multi room use of BluOS or add a wiim product to stream, it doesn’t appear to have a dac so you probably want to go wiim pro plus, the wiim has a line in too so if you are using all three line ins you could add tv through it.Can someone smarter than I help me understand the ramifications of replacing my NAD C 316BEE with this bad boy? I'm guessing I would lose my ability to stream music from my BluOS and listen to movies through my speakers as well via my NAD's AUX jack?
Would there be a way to have the best of the both worlds?
LSA VT-70 Integrated Amplifier | REVIEW
Hi-Fi news, gear reviews, and interviewsparttimeaudiophile.com
Can someone smarter than I help me understand the ramifications of replacing my NAD C 316BEE with this bad boy? I'm guessing I would lose my ability to stream music from my BluOS and listen to movies through my speakers as well via my NAD's AUX jack?
Would there be a way to have the best of the both worlds?
LSA VT-70 Integrated Amplifier | REVIEW
Hi-Fi news, gear reviews, and interviewsparttimeaudiophile.com
Not answering your question, but that “bad boy” isn’t. Check Stereophile’s review. It didn’t meet published specs in regards to output power. It made a paltry 7 watts per channel if I recall correctly.Can someone smarter than I help me understand the ramifications of replacing my NAD C 316BEE with this bad boy? I'm guessing I would lose my ability to stream music from my BluOS and listen to movies through my speakers as well via my NAD's AUX jack?
Would there be a way to have the best of the both worlds?
LSA VT-70 Integrated Amplifier | REVIEW
Hi-Fi news, gear reviews, and interviewsparttimeaudiophile.com
Never mind. Don’t get it. It is pretty though.Not answering your question, but that “bad boy” isn’t. Check Stereophile’s review. It didn’t meet published specs in regards to output power. It made a paltry 7 watts per channel if I recall correctly.
Are you sure its this one? Just read the review and perhaps I glazed over it but they reviewed it rather glowingly and included it in their 2023 recommended components list. Saying things like:Not answering your question, but that “bad boy” isn’t. Check Stereophile’s review. It didn’t meet published specs in regards to output power. It made a paltry 7 watts per channel if I recall correctly.
Definitely positive it’s the same amp. The reviewer loved it but it bombed on the test bench.Are you sure its this one? Just read the review and perhaps I glazed over it but they reviewed it rather glowingly and included it in their 2023 recommended components list. Saying things like:
"for $1299 ($100 more once the intro price expires), you've got yourself a su-weet-sounding tube amplifier that has no glaring faults."
"I confess that an admiring F-bomb escaped my lips when the music started: The VT-70 produced possibly the best-reproduced male voice I've ever heard in my listening room."
Or are you saying these wouldn't be compatible with Wharfedale Lintons?
LSA VT-70 integrated amplifier Page 2
Like most tube amps, the LSA looks best without its protective cage, especially at night. There's something cool and comforting about seeing those fiery filaments out in the open. Besides, tube life may be extended when air can move freely around the hot glass. It's possible.www.stereophile.com
Thanks for the rec! Would your rec change with a budget up to $2000?@Ghost if you want a tube amp, I can recommend this:
JoLida Audio JD202BRC Integrated Stereo Tube Amplifier Black Amazon.com
No subwoofer outputs if that’s important to you. Sounds great, will do 35 watts per channel and would be fine with the Lintons.