Equipment Recommendations - The Home For New System and Upgrade Advice

Question, in general... higher cart loading equals more high end? Sorta? Mines recommended 470 ohms to 1000. I'm running at 470 right now, there is plenty of high end currently, just wondering how adjustments work...
I've read the low inductance of a LOMC cart makes capacitive loading insignificant.
Not sure this is fact but that's why I have never messed with it when I got into higher end LOMCs.
Just 100 Ohm has worked nicely.

Fewer turns of wire around the coils and lower capacitance do not need any specific loading in the phono preamp.

I would be curious to hear feedback if some have experimented more with it.
 
That's interesting because I can't go that high on my stage. JC3+ has MM 47k ohm, MC 47k ohm or MC variable 50-550 Ohms.
View attachment 193856

Yeah I preferred my Hana at 800 rather than 400 minimum quoted too. With your cart is a minimum of 470 so you can still play a little between 470 and the 550 and see if it changes anything for the better or the worse for you.
 
Yeah I preferred my Hana at 800 rather than 400 minimum quoted too. With your cart is a minimum of 470 so you can still play a little between 470 and the 550 and see if it changes anything for the better or the worse for you.
Yeah so far I definitely don't need more high end but I'll play around with it once I reach 30 hours break in and see what happens. I'm still running dead even VTA as well and I trunk I'll probably drop the tail just a touch as well.
 
Yeah I preferred my Hana at 800 rather than 400 minimum quoted too. With your cart is a minimum of 470 so you can still play a little between 470 and the 550 and see if it changes anything for the better or the worse for you.
The differences between 470 and 550 should be practically negligible. @Mather for a real difference check out the MC 47k fixed setting. That should be a significant change in sound. You can be messing with all this before complete run in of the Paua is complete without any issues.
 
I've read the low inductance of a LOMC cart makes capacitive loading insignificant.
Not sure this is fact but that's why I have never messed with it when I got into higher end LOMCs.
Just 100 Ohm has worked nicely.

Fewer turns of wire around the coils and lower capacitance do not need any specific loading in the phono preamp.

I would be curious to hear feedback if some have experimented more with it.
What is the impedance of your current cart? General rule of thumb is 10x the cart impedance for loading. 👍
 
The differences between 470 and 550 should be practically negligible. @Mather for a real difference check out the MC 47k fixed setting. That should be a significant change in sound. You can be messing with all this before complete run in of the Paua is complete without any issues.
Okay so I'm on the MC 47k setting, I've been there the whole time I've had the cart mounted. So this cart is rated > 470. So I'm at 4700 right now?
 
Okay so I'm on the MC 47k setting, I've been there the whole time I've had the cart mounted. So this cart is rated > 470. So I'm at 4700 right now?

I'm looking around but I can't find the impedance for the Paua MKII. The earlier model has different stats...
Soundsmith says the loading should be 470 ohms? Then that should be your home base and would seem to indicate the cartridge impedance is around a highish 47 ohms. I think you will find the cart to sound much fuller with a loading close to 470. You are at 47000 now.
 
I've been wanting to see what a tube sound could be in my system and also curious to see how the integrated Denon phono stands up to a separate unit.

Crutchfield has this one on scratch and dent so I am going to give it a trial to see how it sounds.
Something tells me this leads to hundreds of more dollars in tube fixations. :cool:

Anyone have experience with this one?
They even sell little wood side panels, which is kind of a cool feature.


719zaOnd+6L._AC_SL1500_ (1).jpg
 
Hahaha Jesus Christ. If it sounds good at this setting.... I'm actually happy I did this. Now I just get to listen to everything I already listened to again. Also this is pretty wild because while the highs are currently accentuated they certainly aren't bad by any means so I'm kinda shocked.
Now that I'm a little more awake I have to ask the question - is the Paua a moving iron cartridge? If so, does cartridge loading have as much affect as it does on a moving coil? Not awake enough to know the answer to that one. But if Lederman suggests 470 ohms, then there is your answer. Coffee time.
 
Now that I'm a little more awake I have to ask the question - is the Paua a moving iron cartridge? If so, does cartridge loading have as much affect as it does on a moving coil? Not awake enough to know the answer to that one. But if Lederman suggests 470 ohms, then there is your answer. Coffee time.
Yeah in spinning right now at 470 and honestly I'm going to say there's a negligible difference so I'm guessing perhaps MI matters a bit less on loading. Background is a bit more black (but it was already very black before) and highs are a little tamed vs before but really the difference isn't huge.
 
Hahaha Jesus Christ. If it sounds good at this setting.... I'm actually happy I did this. Now I just get to listen to everything I already listened to again. Also this is pretty wild because while the highs are currently accentuated they certainly aren't bad by any means so I'm kinda shocked.
Nah, it's not like turning the treble control all the way up, it's much more subtle than that and it's not just frequency balance that is affected. Dynamics are affected also with a too low loading tamping the sound down and too high making the proceedings brighter and a little jumpier. again, loading affects are subtle unlike tone controls which are much grosser in their actions.
 
Back
Top