AnthonyI
Well-Known Member
I think genre becomes problematic because of the reasons you stated and genre has gotten a lot of grey area as well over the years, lol. I still like alphabetical by artist or group, last name or band name dropping "The" if it exists. I have moved all my Jazz/Blues albums into their own section now that I have enough to warrant said section, lol.Question: how do people here organize their more modern records?
I’ve been dividing by genre (more or less) and then alphabetically within the genre, but this gets tricky with artists who have spanned several decades or switched genres.
Currently my small/medium collection (~900 records) is divided into the following genres: jazz, classical, opera, blues, country, classic rock, modern rock & alternative. I’ve put certain movie soundtracks and scores into the closest matching genres. It seemed logical at first, but then you have artists like Paul Simon, Paul McCartney, Bruce Springsteen, etc., that have decades stretching from the “classic rock”’era to current. Would it make more sense to just put all rock into one category? If I do, where do other popular, non-rock albums go (NIN, Nirvana, Metallica, 2Pac, X, Bad Religion, Minor Threat) go? They’d be pretty small sub-sections as I don’t have tons, so maybe just alphabetical in the rock/pop section?
But whatever works for you