I love you, too. And we all love Kid A.
People people, please! Let's all just take a step back and remember why we made this thread in the first place... as a friendly place to discuss how fucking terrible Steely Dan is.
I have to ask - would Kid A really be that mindblowing to a kid nowadays? It's a great album but it's been over 20 years since it came out and any album is going to start to sound a bit dated at some point. I'm much younger than the average poster on here but I'm also old enough to where I feel like my generation might be the last to really be wowed by Radiohead. Consider that we live in the age of streaming, where even the most experimental music can find a fairly large audience with the right promotion, and the "shock" of a band like Radiohead releasing something like Kid A just doesn't have the same impact to a modern audience unless they're given all of the context around it.
I get that. My whole thing is Popularity AND critical acclaim AND experienmental/artistic innovation.Swift or Ed Sheeran or Kanye.
According to Wikipedia, Radiohead has sold about 30 million albums (and they’ve released 9 albums over the last 28 years), whereas Imagine Dragons apparently has sold 46 million albums (and they’ve released only 5 albums in 9 years).
I want to clarify that I don't know if I was even trying to make an argument, just hypothesizing on how future generations will look back on Radiohead! I am somewhat fascinated with wondering what the denizens of the future will think looking back on our current media
Sorry. Yeah, I just didn’t want ya to think I was salty toward you (or anyone else) I took your question in the spirit in which it was asked. I just didn’t want to offend anyone caught up in the spirited discussion.
I want to clarify that I don't know if I was even trying to make an argument, just hypothesizing on how future generations will look back on Radiohead! I am somewhat fascinated with wondering what the denizens of the future will think looking back on our current media
It's all good, I didn't take offense to anything, I enjoy a nice back and forth once in a while at the end of the day we are all just passionate music fans with opinions and I think that's neat!Sorry. Yeah, I just didn’t want ya to think I was salty toward you (or anyone else) I took your question in the spirit in which it was asked. I just didn’t want to offend anyone caught up in the spirited discussion.
Right on! I would rather be overly apologetic than unintentionally offend.It's all good, I didn't take offense to anything, I enjoy a nice back and forth once in a while at the end of the day we are all just passionate music fans with opinions and I think that's neat!
I feel seen.FWIW: my Kid A experience was very similar to that of @TenderLovingKiller®. I was a Senior in High School and most in my circle thought it was an excellent album. I mean most of my high school was into the usual 90s mix of cheesy rap, nu-metal, and boy bands, but those who had slightly broader tastes loved Kid A.
Steely Dan is amazing and Ye has an amazing rise, decline and fall. Has an artist fallen harder with so many self-own fails as Ye?
On thr legacy of Radiohead, I think they are an all time top 10 artist of all time (with all the caveats that go towards defining such a list).
Mine was more like @Gavaxeman’s. I absolutely hated Kid A when it came out. I was in the middle of my metal phase and was therefore disgusted by all the bleeping and blooping coming from what “used to be a rock band…” Eventually I grew to appreciate it, though there are at least 3 Radiohead albums I enjoy more (The Bends is my #1).FWIW: my Kid A experience was very similar to that of @TenderLovingKiller®. I was a Senior in High School and most in my circle thought it was an excellent album. I mean most of my high school was into the usual 90s mix of cheesy rap, nu-metal, and boy bands, but those who had slightly broader tastes loved Kid A.
Steely Dan is amazing and Ye has an amazing rise, decline and fall. Has an artist fallen harder with so many self-own fails as Ye?
On thr legacy of Radiohead, I think they are an all time top 10 artist of all time (with all the caveats that go towards defining such a list).
My favorite part of the 33 1/3 book on OK Computer is where he does a track-by-track breakdown and goes on, at length, giving written descriptions of the music in the driest most boring way possible:I just started reading that Steven Hyden book “This Isn’t Happening” and maybe it gets better but so far it’s pretty cringey to me, and I’m not sure if I should keep going. It just feels like he kind of misses the point of what makes Radiohead special, at least, to me. Here are some highlights from the first chapter:
- He interrupts himself many times to quote italicized Kid A lyrics, like he’s telling you what they really mean. Ummmmmmm, yeah pretty sure they’re not meant to have meaning projected on to them by you, guy who didn’t write them. Like it’s fine to speculate, but don’t act like you’re any kind of authority on the meaning of Radiohead lyrics. Or that the lyrics are the point of Radiohead’s music.
- At one point, he states, “By the end of the aughts, Kid A will be regarded by many as the best album of the twenty-first century’s first decade”
- For one- dude, you already called the decade “the aughts” in that sentence - you don’t need to end the sentence by saying “the twenty-first century’s first decade.” Just say “that decade” - we’ll know what you’re talking about. He has this way of drawing things out to make it seem more grandiose and it’s just so unnecessary and annoying.
- He follows that sentence by citing as proof of Kid A’s cultural influence:
- The fact that Pretty Lights made a mashup song of “Everything in It’s Right Place” with NIN’s “Closer” and Nirvana’s “All Apologies”. OMG not a mash-up! Holy shit - those never happen unless a song is truly iconic and paradigm-shifting. Lol
- He then cites the fact that that same song (EIIRP) appeared in the trailer for the Ben Affleck movie “The Accountant” and he ends that sentence by stating that this confirmed “that Radiohead has ascended to ‘thinking-man’s Smash Mouth’ status.” Wha? Why? These comparisons are just upsettingly odd.
- And that’s it - those are the only pieces of evidence cited. Those are his cultural touchstones, apparently.
- He kicks off a rundown of each track on Kid A on the next two pages of the chapter with this sentence: “Let’s quickly recite the track listing for Kid A like bros quoting the Dude at a Big Lebowski convention.” Or how about we don’t - since bros at big lebowski conventions are fucking irrelevant. Seriously, is THAT the lens that you want to look through to analyze Radiohead’s Kid A ?
- The next few pages are all about him and his life and how Radiohead was, like, actually pretty influential for “63%” of his life. Cool story, bro. Super fascinating. Never heard of someone who thought Radiohead was super influential - glad you walked us through that.
Sorry, I just needed to vent. I hope it gets better. I can’t decide whether the issue is that I care too much about how people talk about this album or if he’s trying too hard to try to have an original take on an album that’s not exactly a hidden gem. I think at least part of my frustration is regret at spending $28 purchasing this book. To be fair, I don’t read many books about musicians or albums so maybe it’s just a hard thing to do and maybe he’s doing a better job than most here, but if that’s the case, that would just affirm that I shouldn’t waste my time with these kinds of books.
My favorite part of the 33 1/3 book on OK Computer is where he does a track-by-track breakdown and goes on, at length, giving written descriptions of the music in the driest most boring way possible:
But don't worry, he's got plenty of that word-padding BS going on too.