This is at once fascinating, but also a little scary! That AI can ingest 8 or 9 written reviews and then create what sounds to all intents and purposes like a well-informed conversation between two people about a specific topic is impressive. I for one found it easier to listen to an explanation about why high mass tonearms work better with low compliance carts. I actually came away understanding this better than I had previously.
The one thing they didn't addess though was the big cost difference between the Hana ML and MoFi Ultragold. Here in Australia the Hana will set you back A$1995, the MoFi A$2699.
I totally agree on the ease of consuming the content. I've done like 9 of these for various hifi things now. It's great because it's not like I need to commit to a podcast series or seek things out. I can just skip reading, get the main points told to me while I drive, and go on with my life. Or go back and read more closely if I need to.
On the pricing, that's a huge difference for you in Aus with a 35% increase between the two. For us here in the US, the ML is $1200, the UG is $1500. Still a 25% increase for UG, but not nealy as significant. I think here if you could get to 1200, you can stretch or just save little longer to get to 1500.
I don't trust ai for this stuff. Those Google ai summarys that show up on Google now are frequently completely wrong.. And they are so confident in their facts and yet so completely and utterly wrong.
In my humble opinion the future success of a range of careers is who can effectively leverage AI as a tool. Nothing more, nothing less.
The Google responses have issues because it's just generating off the search results that are ranking according to their algorithms, and looking for consistencies in those postings. If several sites (including social media posts) or pushing incorrect information, or highly authorities sites are posting conflicting information, then it's going to cause problems. The other big step that's missing is a human review or QC process, hence the issues.
Now notebook, what's nice there is I get to control the inputs. I'm hand selecting the sources used to build the podcast. I can decide to only put in sources that I would trust. It's ultimately giving me a summary of multiple reviews without needing to read through the specs and the same marketing sections in every review. And the other things that's nice, is I can also use it to say "you know what, I do want to get all the details from that one" and go back and read it myself.
It hasn't been perfect. I tried to get it to compare the Chinook and the Sutherland 20/20. It kept processing the 20/20 as add on to the Chinook for some reason. So I broke that one into two summaries.