Could always buy an extra tank and use one tank for clean water and one for the water + surfactant combo. I’ve never found the need to do that though. I use tergitol as my surfactant but will probably get some Gsonic soon.Agreed, but at least with the 1 drop of G-Sonic, no additional rinse is required. So for me at least, when you think about what would be required to run an 'extra' rinse cycle, it would include emptying the removable tank of the surfactant-treated water, refilling the HG with non-treated distilled water, running a clean cycle to 'rinse,' and then drying (which wouldn't be extra assuming no drying has happened prior to this point). Then for the next record, back to the surfactant-treated water, etc., etc. Much too much extra work for something that isn't indicated.
You need some level of surfactant to break up the surface tension of H2O.Interesting, I've always been curious about rinsing surfactant. I feel it's just generally a good practice but don't know if it's needed or not.
Yes, but I meant "rising off surfactant".You need some level of surfactant to break up the surface tension of H2O.
Check Neil's paper. He determined what level is ok to leave on that DNAP.Yes, but I meant "rising off surfactant".
I never rinse with the HG and can’t say I’ve noticed any side effectsInteresting, I've always been curious about rinsing surfactant. I feel it's just generally a good practice but don't know if it's needed or not.
One drop of Tergikleen in the water bin would be more than sufficient and no additional rinse cycle would be required. You could experiment with dilutions that amount to less than 1 drop (0.05 ml) per 325 milliliters.OK, so I’m seriously considering getting one. I currently use Tergikleen with my Spin-Clean, then rinse with clean water. I’m seeing on this thread that people use one drop of G-Sonic in the Humminguru. Is there no clean rinse cycle? Could I use my bottle of Tergikleen with it?
As I noted earlier, I use Jet Dry as one of my surfactants. Of course, Jet Dry is a “rinse agent” which is meant to be in the rinse cycle at very diluted levels. The presence of the low concentration surfactant in the rinse helps to accelerate drying.Interesting, I've always been curious about rinsing surfactant. I feel it's just generally a good practice but don't know if it's needed or not.
The reason why many people use distilled water to clean records is not cleanliness per se (i.e. potable quality), but the absence of dissolved minerals. Some cleaners have “sequestering” or “chelating” agents that bind to minerals to keep them from redepositing on the vinyl. It sounds like yours does, too.Maybe I'm quite lucky of living in Scotland as here we have a good quality tap water and only thing I have to add is this cleaning concentrate (on the pic).
I’ve not had any leakage issues cleaning 7”, but it does ride right on the max fill line of the machineAdapters depend on how many 7s and 10s you have. The 10 works well, but I was coming here just now to say I'm basically giving up on the 7 adapter. The problem is you have to overfill it to clean the record and then it leaks everywhere. I cleaned 17 x 7s yesterday and had 3 or 4 major leaks. It happened before too. This is a bit of a pain for me as I have 300-400 7s but I'm mostly fine with it as it's worth it to clean the rest. The rest works v well (and I wouldn't buy anything other than the adapters).
Good to know. I would say full to the max line I was cleaning about 1/2, max 2/3 of the 7. Fine if there's load of dead wax but there isn't on most of my 7s. I feel it up so it gets close to the label and it maybe works once or twice but then starts to leak...I’ve not had any leakage issues cleaning 7”, but it does ride right on the max fill line of the machine
Good to know. I would say full to the max line I was cleaning about 1/2, max 2/3 of the 7. Fine if there's load of dead wax but there isn't on most of my 7s. I feel it up so it gets close to the label and it maybe works once or twice but then starts to leak...
Good to know. I would say full to the max line I was cleaning about 1/2, max 2/3 of the 7. Fine if there's load of dead wax but there isn't on most of my 7s. I feel it up so it gets close to the label and it maybe works once or twice but then starts to leak...
Yeah, I'd say the benefits (cost, efficiency, performance, convenience) far outweigh the potential risks, which are few. Oh, and I don't see any reason why you'd need or want the dustcover. If you want to cover it beyond the lid, you can always craft your own, but I don't see any reason for it.This is all good info as I def. have a good amount of 7" (Not many 10") that I need to do because they have always been a nightmare to do with my VPI and only worsens the more I do. It seems like i've seen 7" issues on most cleaners though (Below the $5-600 price range at least) so i'm guessing the non-12" vinyl is probably more of an afterthought then the center of attention which the 12" obviously is. As long as I can still slowly get through them over time I can live with some smaller issues there I guess.
It was kind of nice to see a good hand full + of newer videos on Youtube that weren't there the last time I was researching this. I remember when the Kickstarter was going I was a bit worried about the longevity and support but it seems to be doing well and when it doesn't I seen several people mention the great customer service which is another welcomed surprise these days especially.
Yeah, I'd say the benefits (cost, efficiency, performance, convenience) far outweigh the potential risks, which are few. Oh, and I don't see any reason why you'd need or want the dustcover. If you want to cover it beyond the lid, you can always craft your own, but I don't see any reason for it.