Political Discussion

Ah ok. Then i like the electric ones, its a van, none are pretty so not all that fussed about aesthetics.

These new vehicles were designed around increased package delivery.

Regular mail is down, and package delivery is up. Package delivery is also one of the USPS only profitable service currently and they are looking to expand their capacity to deliver packages.

The new vans were built taller with much more room for package storage.

Interesting how they said package delivery is profitable, where as our former president was saying it was a loss and pointing fingers at amazon.
 
These new vehicles were designed around increased package delivery.

Regular mail is down, and package delivery is up. Package delivery is also one of the USPS only profitable service currently and they are looking to expand their capacity to deliver packages.

The new vans were built taller with much more room for package storage.

Interesting how they said package delivery is profitable, where as our former president was saying it was a loss and pointing fingers at amazon.

Your former toddler in chief wanted to destroy the business to suppress voting rights. Everything he said around USPS has to be seen through a partisan political lens and so be taken with an enormous grain of salt. It’s also almost as much that parcel delivery is the only show in town. Email and online billing has taken such a huge chunk out of letter mail that parcels are where it’s at, especially in the last year with everyone stuck at home and shops shut. Whether it’s profitable now or not it is the only real reliable revenue stream for a postal service going forward so they have to focus on it above almost all else.
 
Alternate GOP proposal for increasing the minimum wage. It doesn't go nearly far enough. I get it. They don't want to put small businesses out of business. We cannot keep protecting giant monopolies by citing that worker protections and wage increases would kill small business. You know what kills small business? The anti-competitive nature of monopolies.

The recent proposal released by Sens. Mitt Romney (R-Utah) and Tom Cotton (R-Ark.) would not even increase the minimum wage to 1960s levels, after adjusting for inflation. It is a meager increase that fails to address the problem of low pay in the U.S. economy.

The Romney–Cotton proposal would slowly raise the federal minimum wage from its current level of $7.25 per hour to $10 per hour in 2025. In contrast, the Raise the Wage Act of 2021 would raise the minimum wage to $15 per hour by 2025.

Romney–Cotton’s $10 target by 2025 is the equivalent of $9.19 per hour in today’s dollars, about 13% less than what the minimum wage was at its high-water mark in 1968.

It is unconscionable that we should pay the lowest-wage workers today less than what they earned five decades ago, while the economy’s productivity has more than doubled over the last 50 years. The Romney–Cotton proposal would continue that harmful trend; would maintain a separate lower wage for young workers and those with disabilities; and would—incredibly—fail to increase the separate minimum wage for tipped workers that has been stuck at $2.13 per hour for 30 years.



Do we have any figures with how the minimum wage compares to things like rent, college tuition, healthcare and what not. I bet you would find that even $15 an hour doesn't compare anywhere close to the 1960's numbers.
 
Do we have any figures with how the minimum wage compares to things like rent, college tuition, healthcare and what not. I bet you would find that even $15 an hour doesn't compare anywhere close to the 1960's numbers.

As much as I want people to earn a livable wage i think this policy it a temporary fix for something that reverts back to a minimal affect over time.
 
Do we have any figures with how the minimum wage compares to things like rent, college tuition, healthcare and what not. I bet you would find that even $15 an hour doesn't compare anywhere close to the 1960's numbers.
No this minimum wage is not really going to be able to help workers afford housing, but we still don't know exactly how Covid is going to affect rents in large cities.

A full-time worker needs to earn an hourly wage of $23.96 on average to afford a modest, two-bedroom rental home in the U.S. This Housing Wage for a two-bedroom home is $16.71 higher than the federal minimum wage of $7.25, and $5.74 higher than the national average hourly wage of $18.22 earned by renters. In 11 states and the District of Columbia, the two-bedroom Housing Wage is more than $25.00 per hour.

Renters with the lowest incomes face the greatest challenge in finding affordable housing. The average minimum wage worker must work nearly 97 hours per week to afford a two-bedroom rental home or 79 hours per week to afford a one-bedroom rental home at the average fair market rent. In no state can a person working full-time at the federal minimum wage afford a two-bedroom apartment at the Fair Market Rent. In only 145 counties can a full-time worker earning the minimum wage afford a one-bedroom rental home at the Fair Market Rent.

In most areas of the U.S., a family of four with poverty-level income earns no more than $26,200 and can afford monthly rent of no more than $655. The national average fair market rent for a one-bedroom home is $1,017 per month and $1,246 for a two-bedroom home, far from affordable for a family in poverty.


And as for healthcare:

The survey found that the average family coverage ran $20,576 in 2019, a 5 percent increase over last year. Workers paid nearly 30 percent of the total, or $6,015, on average.

The average premium for single coverage rose 4 percent, to $7,188, and workers paid $1,242 of that amount, or about 18 percent of the total. During the same period, inflation and wages grew at a slower rate, rising 2 percent and 3.4 percent, respectively, a pattern that has remained consistent over the past several years.

The average deductible for single coverage was $1,655, an amount that has increased by more than a third in the past five years. More than 40 percent of covered workers had deductibles of at least $2,000 in 2019.

“Costs are prohibitive when workers making $25,000 a year have to shell out $7,000 a year just for their share of family premiums,” Drew Altman, KFF president and CEO, said in a press release announcing the study’s release.



And surprise, surprise, they found that even when health care was offered to low wage workers, that coverage was in no way comprehensive.
 

I lost a limited edition pressing of Death's Symbolic and an out of print board game to a mail truck fire. No compensation because I didn't purchase insurance (I didn't even know that was an option). They didn't even notify me. For over two weeks my tracking said "Out for delivery." I had to go to the post office where they reluctantly told me what happened. T'was a sad day.
 
In this area all rentals built in the last 15 years have targeted people who make 100k a year or more.

Even one bedroom apartments and studios are priced this way. They are either priced for one person making 100k, or double income.

An hourly wage of $32 an hour with single income is considered living above your means for almost all one bedroom rentals.

I can only afford the cheapest rental properties in Salem. The new apartments they just built I can come nowhere close to being able to afford.

Guess I'm in the wrong career. The Millennial able to afford this housing are likely working in finance or insurance in Boston. Which Boston is big on. I was talking to one such person, and their salary is 350k . No wonder they can afford a one bedroom apartment that targets people with an income of 100k or more.

A family of 2 could not afford a many of the 1 bedroom apartment around here if both were making a minimum wage of $15 an hour. Have kids to support? Forget about it, you would need to get into section 8 housing. Which has up to a 15 year waiting list in this area!



When I was in college, my career path was looking like I could easily make 120k a year when I reached the 3-5 year experience range.

The floor fell out with the recession and globalization. Most companies want to off shore web development work and there is a mentality that "any one can work" and that it's no longer a specialized skill.

5 years experience will now land you with a salary of 45k to 70k depending where you are located in much of the country for a Front End Web Developer.

Jobs in the 6 figure range today either have requirements of 20 years experience or is contractor position.

Technically I'm a Full Stack Developer, which includes backend languages and apps. And I do that kind of work. But my job title and pay does not reflect that. And that's because font end development still makes up the majority of my work as well as many of my colleges. It's like the backend work has to make up the majority of our work for them to considers full stack. But in that case they could use the same argument to say you are a Backend Developer, and not a Full Stack Developer. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

We are flat with no career growth path where I work other than moving up to a VP level position and then the work isn't so much development but rather marketing decisions, sales and management. No yearly cost of living adjustments either. The only real way for me to get a raise is to move around.

Been keeping an eye on things to see if any better job openings come up. But there really has been nothing in the past year. Covid aside, our job Market is saturated. Wayfair laid off 1,000 developers in January of 2020. Much of the advertising agencies also downsized in January of 2020. This means any job that does gets posted is highly competitive with hundreds of people applying for them.

With the surplus of talent, this means the wages are not good on the jobs that do come up. I have been watching Glass Door and there hasn't been anything in the last year that has been worth applying for. They would all mean a pay cut for me. I even saw a front end developer position with 5 years experience listed in Boston for $15 an hour on Glass Door :oops:
 
I lost a limited edition pressing of Death's Symbolic and an out of print board game to a mail truck fire. No compensation because I didn't purchase insurance (I didn't even know that was an option). They didn't even notify me. For over two weeks my tracking said "Out for delivery." I had to go to the post office where they reluctantly told me what happened. T'was a sad day.
That sucks.

Also, for most records I have purchased, I have never seen the option to add insurance in most retailer or bands shipping options.

How do you even add it?
 
I lost a limited edition pressing of Death's Symbolic and an out of print board game to a mail truck fire. No compensation because I didn't purchase insurance (I didn't even know that was an option). They didn't even notify me. For over two weeks my tracking said "Out for delivery." I had to go to the post office where they reluctantly told me what happened. T'was a sad day.

Did you watch the video. It’s not just about them catching on fire. It’s about how inefficient gas and all the resources wasted the have been put into redesigning them.
 
That sucks.

Also, for most records I have purchased, I have never seen the option to add insurance in most retailer or bands shipping options.

How do you even add it?
I know on items I send via USPS via media mail I can add on insurance at additional cost. I generally take a bit of cost on to do so just in case for pricier items. I imagine most bands or stores don't offer since they find it easier to replace the record.
 
I know on items I send via USPS via media mail I can add on insurance at additional cost. I generally take a bit of cost on to do so just in case for pricier items. I imagine most bands or stores don't offer since they find it easier to replace the record.
Which means you are generally SOL on a limited release that is sold out :cry:
 

Here is the latest on the stimulus.

No surprise that the Republicans oppose it. Say it's too large, socialism and don't think it is actually needed and that we should wait and see how things progress verses rushing to pass a bill.

When it comes to democrats, many moderate democrats are opposed to certain aspects of the bill, such as increasing the middle wage. Something that progressives are pushing for.
 

Here is the latest on the stimulus.

No surprise that the Republicans oppose it. Say it's too large, socialism and don't think it is actually needed and that we should wait and see how things progress verses rushing to pass a bill.

When it comes to democrats, many moderate democrats are opposed to certain aspects of the bill, such as increasing the middle wage. Something that progressives are pushing for.
They are voting on it tomorrow in the House and have a +10 vote cushion. I would be surprised it it didn’t pass exactly as Biden proposed it. Unlike the previous administration it seems like the Biden administration understands the benefits the bully pulpit that the Presidency wields. I am sure they will be able to whip up enough support. The Senate is where they’ll will run into issues. I am sure it will still pass but they may need some concessions due to their slim margins.
 
They are voting on it tomorrow in the House and have a +10 vote cushion. I would be surprised it it didn’t pass exactly as Biden proposed it. Unlike the previous administration it seems like the Biden administration understands the benefits the bully pulpit that the Presidency wields. I am sure they will be able to whip up enough support. The Senate is where they’ll will run into issues. I am sure it will still pass but they may need some concessions due to their slim margins.

exactly. We know we will likely have 50 votes against i from the get go. This means 50 votes for it is the ceiling and the tie breaker comes into play.

The issue is, convincing a couple of moderate democrats that they need to vote for it. What's his face from I think West Virginia comes to mind.

The $15 an hour minimum wage might be a sticking point. This is the section of the bill that is most likely to see some concessions sadly.

Not things like yet another airline bailout.
 
In this area all rentals built in the last 15 years have targeted people who make 100k a year or more.

Even one bedroom apartments and studios are priced this way. They are either priced for one person making 100k, or double income.

An hourly wage of $32 an hour with single income is considered living above your means for almost all one bedroom rentals.

I can only afford the cheapest rental properties in Salem. The new apartments they just built I can come nowhere close to being able to afford.

Guess I'm in the wrong career. The Millennial able to afford this housing are likely working in finance or insurance in Boston. Which Boston is big on. I was talking to one such person, and their salary is 350k . No wonder they can afford a one bedroom apartment that targets people with an income of 100k or more.

A family of 2 could not afford a many of the 1 bedroom apartment around here if both were making a minimum wage of $15 an hour. Have kids to support? Forget about it, you would need to get into section 8 housing. Which has up to a 15 year waiting list in this area!



When I was in college, my career path was looking like I could easily make 120k a year when I reached the 3-5 year experience range.

The floor fell out with the recession and globalization. Most companies want to off shore web development work and there is a mentality that "any one can work" and that it's no longer a specialized skill.

5 years experience will now land you with a salary of 45k to 70k depending where you are located in much of the country for a Front End Web Developer.

Jobs in the 6 figure range today either have requirements of 20 years experience or is contractor position.

Technically I'm a Full Stack Developer, which includes backend languages and apps. And I do that kind of work. But my job title and pay does not reflect that. And that's because font end development still makes up the majority of my work as well as many of my colleges. It's like the backend work has to make up the majority of our work for them to considers full stack. But in that case they could use the same argument to say you are a Backend Developer, and not a Full Stack Developer. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

We are flat with no career growth path where I work other than moving up to a VP level position and then the work isn't so much development but rather marketing decisions, sales and management. No yearly cost of living adjustments either. The only real way for me to get a raise is to move around.

Been keeping an eye on things to see if any better job openings come up. But there really has been nothing in the past year. Covid aside, our job Market is saturated. Wayfair laid off 1,000 developers in January of 2020. Much of the advertising agencies also downsized in January of 2020. This means any job that does gets posted is highly competitive with hundreds of people applying for them.

With the surplus of talent, this means the wages are not good on the jobs that do come up. I have been watching Glass Door and there hasn't been anything in the last year that has been worth applying for. They would all mean a pay cut for me. I even saw a front end developer position with 5 years experience listed in Boston for $15 an hour on Glass Door :oops:

I feel this.

I flexed my client-facing communication skills when my company started offshoring our devs to India, who make like 1/3 of our onshore folks, and transitioned into an Operations Lead. It likely saved my job. I was a database dev, but the web and front end folks had it much worse. My team of ~20 folks had 4 on shore web devs and a few offshore. We now have 1 onshore, who is the manager for the offshore folks. It was a sad bloodbath across our entire organization, and I miss the colleagues that we lost in the process, both on my team and not.

I hardly ever code anything anymore, but I also feel like my tech background and new client services experience has really set me up to grow my career. If I hadn't made the decision to transition the month before one of our team leads was let go, I don't know where I'd be now.

I'm also lucky that the cost of living in Akron, OH is crazy low compared to the coasts.
 
I feel this.

I flexed my client-facing communication skills when my company started offshoring our devs to India, who make like 1/3 of our onshore folks, and transitioned into an Operations Lead. It likely saved my job. I was a database dev, but the web and front end folks had it much worse. My team of ~20 folks had 4 on shore web devs and a few offshore. We now have 1 onshore, who is the manager for the offshore folks. It was a sad bloodbath across our entire organization, and I miss the colleagues that we lost in the process, both on my team and not.

I hardly ever code anything anymore, but I also feel like my tech background and new client services experience has really set me up to grow my career. If I hadn't made the decision to transition the month before one of our team leads was let go, I don't know where I'd be now.

I'm also lucky that the cost of living in Akron, OH is crazy low compared to the coasts.

Another fun thing is our clients always want to do more for less every year. We are always taking a hit in our retainer revenue each year and each year our clients want more work done.

Our clients are always complaining about "how we are too expensive". For some of our clients, we are not longer able to touch any of the development work. We can only do the design and consulting. We are no longer an authorized dev shop that these global companies utilize because "we are too expensive". The majority of our work is for pharmaceutical companies.

So we work with a lot of dev shops in India now. And a lot of times we have to build out code and send it to them because they say it can't be done or can't figure it out. But we don't get paid for that work. It's just insane.

I also personally love when we fill bugs for things that are broken, don't work right or have serious performance issues because of bad code, more than half the time the manager at the dev shop in India just flat out tells us no, they are not going to fix that. They are worried about keeping their production line moving verses spending time on fixing bugs. You get what you pay for.
 
Welp. As was kinda expected, there goes the $15 minimum wage increase from the Covid Relief bill per the Senate parliamentary rules.



I saw Romney and Cotton have their own $10 an hour minimum wage bill, maybe they can come up with a compromise and at least get some people some help.
 
Back
Top