Political Discussion

Thought folks here might be interested in reading this. It's about the Twin Cities but it's probably applicable in most urban areas.

This all will be difficult to undo and it isn't going to undo itself. A free-market built on an inequitable foundation isn't free to all.
 
The conservative SCOTUS just delivered a blow to unions today.

When it comes to agricultural workers and case brought on against the state of California, California's law that requires land owners to allow union representatives on to their land to talk to workers so many times a year can not stand without compensation being giving to the landowners.

The SCOTUS basically said this law is basically like the government taking their land. And if the government takes their land they need to be compensated for it.

Corporate farms and large private landowners do not want the union on their land. Many of their workers are migrants and no nothing about unions. And they don't want them finding out and organizing to keep costs down.
 

A Missouri judge blocked Medicaid expansion in the state on Wednesday, saying the ballot initiative that voters approved last year was unconstitutional.
The court action stems from Republican Gov. Mike Parson's decision last month not to expand Medicaid to roughly 275,000 low-income adults on July 1 because lawmakers did not appropriate funding.


The reason Mike Parson did not listen to voters wishes was because expanded medicaid was not funded. It was not funded because state legislators did not do their job to fund it.

So the initiative that voters approved last year is unconstitutional, because voters don't how the power in the state to fund law. Only the state legislator can.

The majority of voters in a red state voted for expanded medicaid.

But the GOP has effectively blocked it.
 
The conservative SCOTUS just delivered a blow to unions today.

When it comes to agricultural workers and case brought on against the state of California, California's law that requires land owners to allow union representatives on to their land to talk to workers so many times a year can not stand without compensation being giving to the landowners.

The SCOTUS basically said this law is basically like the government taking their land. And if the government takes their land they need to be compensated for it.

Corporate farms and large private landowners do not want the union on their land. Many of their workers are migrants and no nothing about unions. And they don't want them finding out and organizing to keep costs down.


That is fine organizing is better done other places. And it’s private property, they should be able to control who is on it.
 
Is this a sign that Amazon is running out of people willing to work for them?

Amazon has ditched cannabis testing from their required drug test for employment. They expect many new hires to fallow now that this change is in place.
 


Chaos erupts over controversial policies at school board meeting​

Parents were invited to voice their opinions on critical race theory and transgender policies at a school board meeting in Virginia, but the meeting soon turned into chaos leading to at least one arrest.


Is anyone else disgusted by what the people speaking out against CRT and transgender policies say in this video clip / school board meeting?
 

A growing trend across the country is job applicants for hospitality / restaurant jobs as well as other low wage jobs are not showing up for interviews ghosting the business. One restaurant owner in Minnesota described the situation as for about every 200 interviews he sets up, only about 12 people show up for those interviews. The rest are no call no shows. And this is why it's so hard to fill staffing shortages right now. Hotels are complaining about doubling their opening salary to $15 an hour to clean rooms and still can't get anyone to show up for interviews.

I took no sympathy to business owners complaining about people ghosting them. As that's exactly what they do to many people who apply for jobs.

It's unclear what is causing this trend. Is it states requirement to show proof of job search activities to be eligible for unemployment? Or are people just not interested in these jobs and don't think they are worth their time for the pay they would get.

Likely, it's a combination of both.

But it's becoming clear, we will not see low wage jobs return to normalcy post pandemic. The staffing shortages are likely to remain until wages are better. People want good paying jobs. Not be front line workers that get paid very little.

This is very much turning into backlash of 40 years of keeping wages depressed and growing wage inequality. People just are not interesting in jobs that don't pay enough.

A study in Washington State showed that if wages were increased to liveable wages where someone could only work one job and not 2 or 3 to get by that all open positions that they could not fill would be filled. People who previously passed on the job openings and did not apply because they didn't think the wages were worth their time were now suddenly applying. And they found good hard workers. The problem is, corporations do not want to pay these types of wages. It eats into shareholder profits and they can't have that.

One of the things I have heard is we are due for a major correction of wage suppression over the next 10 to 20 years. And this will include huge amounts of inflation because corporations will pass on all the higher wage expenses to the consumer.

We could be looking at a situation in 2040 where $30 an hour is equivalent to a $15 an hour job today if the feds don't keep inflation under control and corporations aren't able to keep wages depressed.
I've read several articles and I think one of the biggest problems is affordable child care. When you break down the jobless numbers, there are a lot more women staying out of the workforce citing that they didn't have reliable child care and/or elder care. What I am seeing anecdotally is that poorer people are having to drive longer and longer distances from their homes, in communities where they can afford to live, and go to more affluent areas to work. Most of the time, the travel and gas that it takes to get to work makes a lot of jobs unworkable for these people. While yes, this has a lot to do with suppressed wages, it spills over into affordable housing and reliable public transportation (the sort of public transportation that we don't have). If we made it easier for people to afford to live closer to where they worked, there might be a lot fewer no-shows.
Back to war games with the Russians. This is some high stakes geopolitical poker.

What in the world are these people thinking? Why?




The reason Mike Parson did not listen to voters wishes was because expanded medicaid was not funded. It was not funded because state legislators did not do their job to fund it.

So the initiative that voters approved last year is unconstitutional, because voters don't how the power in the state to fund law. Only the state legislator can.

The majority of voters in a red state voted for expanded medicaid.

But the GOP has effectively blocked it.
Ah, it's the will of the people, until it gets in the way of neoliberal/neoconservative strategy.
Is this a sign that Amazon is running out of people willing to work for them?

Amazon has ditched cannabis testing from their required drug test for employment. They expect many new hires to fallow now that this change is in place.
So are they saying that essentially to get through the day at Amazon, workers probably should just be high?
 
So are they saying that essentially to get through the day at Amazon, workers probably should just be high?

Lol!

Basically what their are saying is too many of their potential job pool is unhirable because they fail a drug test. To be able to hire the number of people they need, they need to be less selective during the hiring process.
 
That is fine organizing is better done other places. And it’s private property, they should be able to control who is on it.

I disagree (sort-of). In the case of agricultural workers, the land owner's property is the place of business. It's the office for the agricultural workers. Union reps have the right to approach and meet with their members in other places of business on different types of land that may or may not be owned by the employer.

I don't know the details about this case. So if it was about organizing or forming the union then the employer / land owner has the right of way.

In terms of union meetings / organizing. One of the many things I've found most inequitable about them is the when, where, and how meetings take place. They often are not held at the place of employment or during hours where people with children or other dependent needs can attend. They also are often not easily accessible by public transportation. I hope that some of this is changing with the remote meeting world we now live in.
 
Is anyone else disgusted by what the people speaking out against CRT and transgender policies say in this video clip / school board meeting?

There's no cure for this particular disease. Trying to convince / educate people about anything when they have chosen to "believe" something is folly. Being outraged about everybody who sucks or just simply disagrees with you is exhausting and much more difficult as you get older.
 
I've read several articles and I think one of the biggest problems is affordable child care. When you break down the jobless numbers, there are a lot more women staying out of the workforce citing that they didn't have reliable child care and/or elder care. What I am seeing anecdotally is that poorer people are having to drive longer and longer distances from their homes, in communities where they can afford to live, and go to more affluent areas to work. Most of the time, the travel and gas that it takes to get to work makes a lot of jobs unworkable for these people. While yes, this has a lot to do with suppressed wages, it spills over into affordable housing and reliable public transportation (the sort of public transportation that we don't have). If we made it easier for people to afford to live closer to where they worked, there might be a lot fewer no-shows.

What in the world are these people thinking? Why?

Ah, it's the will of the people, until it gets in the way of neoliberal/neoconservative strategy.

So are they saying that essentially to get through the day at Amazon, workers probably should just be high?

I think it’s part of the geopolitical mind games. The U.K. Russian relations are at an absolute low point given Russian actions on British soil over the last decade (all the radioactive poisoning).

Basically this is an attempt to assert that Russia’s annexation of Crimea was illegal under International Law and that the waters are thus Ukrainian and the U.K. warship is entitled to be in Ukrainian waters under treaty. Russia obviously doesn’t agree.

It is a scary game of brinkmanship but Putin wants a war or an obvious international incident every bit as little as the U.K. does and I suppose we can’t keep letting him get away with bullying the rest of the world.

It is still pretty depressing all the same to see us back where we thought we’d left in 1991 with the collapse of the USSR.
 

A case of racial profile and a black teen being in the wrong neighborhood at the wrong time.

A 16 year old african american boy was was walking down the street wearing a hoodie and black pants heading to his girlfriends.

The state trooper described him as looking as suspicious. The state trooper then saw the teen head into the backyard of a house and gave pursuit. The cop described the teen as darting through shrubs into the backyard of a house acting like a burglar. The official police report stated: “behavior, demeanor, and body language appeared to be a burglar.”

The teen was actually texting on his phone letting his girlfriend know he had arrived and was to meet her at the back door.

The teen was then scared and texted his girlfriend that a cop was following him into the back yard. She replied with "Don't worry, you didn't do anything wrong."

The coop arrives to see the teen standing on the back patio texting. The cop yells for him to put his hands behind his back and moves in to make an arrest. The teen says that he did nothing wrong and that he's here to see his girlfriend who is on the way down.

The cop then tases him for not following direction / complying with his orders. Then tases him several more times. His girlfriend comes outside horrified with what's going on.

The teen was arrested and charged with a traffic related crime.

Brown, an attorney for more than 20 years, said he’s never seen someone arrested for a public order crime, failing to obey, saying, “It falls under the traffic statutes for disobeying and officers lawful command and a traffic situation,” he said.

The next day the charges were adjusted to loitering, prowling and resisting arrest. In Florida, it's legal for an officer to detain someone for loitering or prowling if they believe there is cause to do so.

The teen remains in jail as of this time. The officer has not been suspended.
 
@jaycee

As for Charter vs Public schools. It’s very complicated mostly because it depends on the individual culture of the school and the community they belong to. One of the things that I always think wen right wing people complain about public education is that the school culture reflects the community from which they pull from, students and staff. Charter schools were created to reflect this. Public schools weren’t meeting the needs of the students in some way and various things were getting in the way.

This was blamed on many things, admin red tape, union teachers, and that they weren’t spending enough money on the kids. Charter have more control over how they spend money, policies, raise funds, and what and how they teach. My brother in law works for a charter as an aide while he is getting his teaching credential. The charter he works for serves a very low income area and is geared towards families that are new immigrants. They understand the families needs, support them with specific programs and are more open towards the cultures they come from. The staff reflect this. Staff meetings are more likely to include pan dulce rather than donuts. Good public schools are like this as well.

However, my wife has worked in other charter schools as a psych. She has struggled with this. charters she has worked are filled with people who don’t understand the culture of the people of communit they work in. I.e. Harvard grad admin having unrealistic expectations of the behavior of students from south central LA. And him trying to be authoritarian with them 😂. Also because most charges are non-union or hired based on private contracts the incentives are different. My wife has had to stand up to admin and school staff for various things having to do with sped assessment. I because I’m in a union have a much easier time doing this. I can disagree and still keep my job.

often there incentives in charters to both keep students there that they cannot serve, intellectual disability, Or kick students out because they can not deal with them, ADHD or Emotional Disturbance.


my wife has experienced this with the public schools where we live as well. They tried to pull some pandemic shit and reduce my son’s services at the beginning of the year. I politely reminded them that it was not on the IEP And they quickly changed Their tune. their sped program is ripe for lawsuits, but the parents don’t know any difference. They do not serve the English language learners well. There is no mental health supports. And what has me and my wife thinking about enrolling him in the district i work in or maybe a charter school is the lack of diversity. My wife recently had to have a conversation about his insecurities about having “black” hair. He has brown hair, but it was dark enough for another student to disagree with him and made him feel othered. He’s 5. The student has blonde hair and was praised by the teacher because of it, she‘s Chilean. 😒

i wanted my kid to go to a school in the community we lived in, but it doesn’t seem to be n the cards. All of these things motivated me to looks for ways to help the district change. They need some outside pressure to do this, which is part of the reason why I volunteered to work on the NAACP education committee. We will see what happens though, I’m going to have to get a resume together and interview.
 
@jaycee

As for Charter vs Public schools. It’s very complicated mostly because it depends on the individual culture of the school and the community they belong to. One of the things that I always think wen right wing people complain about public education is that the school culture reflects the community from which they pull from, students and staff. Charter schools were created to reflect this. Public schools weren’t meeting the needs of the students in some way and various things were getting in the way.

This was blamed on many things, admin red tape, union teachers, and that they weren’t spending enough money on the kids. Charter have more control over how they spend money, policies, raise funds, and what and how they teach. My brother in law works for a charter as an aide while he is getting his teaching credential. The charter he works for serves a very low income area and is geared towards families that are new immigrants. They understand the families needs, support them with specific programs and are more open towards the cultures they come from. The staff reflect this. Staff meetings are more likely to include pan dulce rather than donuts. Good public schools are like this as well.

However, my wife has worked in other charter schools as a psych. She has struggled with this. charters she has worked are filled with people who don’t understand the culture of the people of communit they work in. I.e. Harvard grad admin having unrealistic expectations of the behavior of students from south central LA. And him trying to be authoritarian with them 😂. Also because most charges are non-union or hired based on private contracts the incentives are different. My wife has had to stand up to admin and school staff for various things having to do with sped assessment. I because I’m in a union have a much easier time doing this. I can disagree and still keep my job.

often there incentives in charters to both keep students there that they cannot serve, intellectual disability, Or kick students out because they can not deal with them, ADHD or Emotional Disturbance.


my wife has experienced this with the public schools where we live as well. They tried to pull some pandemic shit and reduce my son’s services at the beginning of the year. I politely reminded them that it was not on the IEP And they quickly changed Their tune. their sped program is ripe for lawsuits, but the parents don’t know any difference. They do not serve the English language learners well. There is no mental health supports. And what has me and my wife thinking about enrolling him in the district i work in or maybe a charter school is the lack of diversity. My wife recently had to have a conversation about his insecurities about having “black” hair. He has brown hair, but it was dark enough for another student to disagree with him and made him feel othered. He’s 5. The student has blonde hair and was praised by the teacher because of it, she‘s Chilean. 😒

i wanted my kid to go to a school in the community we lived in, but it doesn’t seem to be n the cards. All of these things motivated me to looks for ways to help the district change. They need some outside pressure to do this, which is part of the reason why I volunteered to work on the NAACP education committee. We will see what happens though, I’m going to have to get a resume together and interview.

Thank you for this. I really appreciate the thoughtful response. Some of this I was assuming but it really helps to hear the direct experience. My sister is also a SpEd teacher/admin person. We don't talk much but I have some lay of the land and how messed-up it is from her.

I really feel like the degradation / loss of public school facilities, the disinvestment and/or inappropriate investment for different schools and the way public tax dollars for schools are spread around inequitably is a major social and cultural issue. These "losses" have really big impacts on neighborhood culture and identity - pride even . Schools were a pillar of community, along with local businesses, religious and cultural centers, etc. and when a school is degraded or lost I feel like there are big social and psychological impacts on place.
 
Democrats had slipped a provision into the $1.9 trillion stimulus bill to include reparations for past wrongs committed by the USDA against farmers of color. Something of course the republicans didn't approve of, but it was in the final stimulus bill that passed.

The USDA was set to make payments to farmers of color as approved by congress until several lawsuits were filed from gom different groups of white farmers arguing that the USDA's program discriminates against them and is unconstitutional.

A Wisconsin judge had already temporarily blocked the payments earlier this year, but a federal judge in Florida blocked the payments nationwide stating that the USDA debt relief payments to only people of color discriminates against white farmers who are economically disadvantaged by these payments.

Separate lawsuits against these payments exist in states such as Texas, Tennessee, Wyoming and Illinois.
 


Heated debate with a GOP senator Florida Rep. Mark Waltz over CRT and West Point.

Basically the GOP senator's viewpoint is there is no place for racism at west point, and there is no place for extermisim. Extremism being CRT.

A group of 23 in a discussion about CRT with an author on the subject is a bigger issue for the senator than black cadets getting harsher punishments for the same infraction, being called the n word, or hell, even having to run down Robert E. Lee Boulevard daily or live in Lee barrocs while attending West Point.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top