Angsty
Well-Known Member
The hypothesis is that minimizing the measured difference of the input to the output is what constitutes better sound reproduction. Artifacts such as distortion and noise increase the difference between input and output. Those things can be fully measured in the electrical realm. In the acoustic realm, other physical phenomena come into play because now you are moving air between an audio source and your ears.I don’t doubt that those measurements are of something and that they can be read to mean something.
My question is: What is the hypothesis? If you are seeking to hold them up as a measure of reviewing a piece of gear then how do they inform why it sounds good and why you can recommend that someone else might think that it sounds good. And if you can’t is it really a scientific approach or is it in fact a pseudo-scientific approach.
Why something sounds “good” to you may have less to do with electronics than with psychoacoustics. Ears and brains are not strictly linear detectors of sound. Which is why I say, play and use what you enjoy, not just what measures the best.