Time for Some Play Action: The Fantasy Football Thread

Speedracer said:
A D+ grade with the first overall pick seems worse 😅 Felt compelled to reach a bit each time cause I had to wait 30 picks before my next turn.
Click to expand...
Yeah, I think I was punished in my evaluation because I took too many rookies. The NFL has changed quite a bit over the past decade and it feels like most rookies (especially early rounders that play a skill position) are expected to preform right out the gate. I get that they are a riskier bet since they’ve never played in the NFL and many of them end up on terrible teams but feel like a good amount f them will succeed and while they may improve further in their 2nd or 3rd years in the league if they break out in their rookie season they will end up exceeding their draft position and likely be thought of as a steal at the end of the year.

I could be completely wrong and only win one game too but with such a low starting point all I can do is go up.
 
wmeugene said:
I actually think the opposite, funnily enough. I think this game has 24-17 written all over it.
Click to expand...
Yeah, I guess they could be tight but I still remember Buffalos last game of the playoffs last year and LA always has the potential to run up a big number. It looks like Caesar’s has the over/under at 52 sounds like you would take the under. I think its gonna be a wild one but I have been wrong before.
 
TenderLovingKiller® said:
Yeah, I guess they could be tight but I still remember Buffalos last game of the playoffs last year and LA always has the potential to run up a big number. It looks like Caesar’s has the over/under at 52 sounds like you would take the under. I think its gonna be a wild one but I have been wrong before.
Click to expand...
I made a small bet on the under. I spent more effort on putting the Rams in teases up to +8.5
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top