Probably true, but what's curious to me, is that they seem to have at least tried to accurately replicate the back cover. So it doesn't really seem like the Dexter Gordon situation where they were probably supplied with image files of a CD reissue. They probably had an original to work with and the front cover maybe just needed a bunch of editing of work. So the whole thing just comes off a bit lazy to me.
Am I thinking of another label, or did I read somewhere once where they literally said they sometimes buy multiple copies of originals to reproduce the artwork?