Sorry to detract away from the new store set-up, but I properly listened to the Etta Jones exclusive last night and read the liner notes etc.
The record sounds great, but why on earth did they edit the cover so much? The original pressing has a clear shot of Etta with a subtle peach hue over the photo. The VMP one has a overly darkened and saturated shot of her with the really strong pink hue. This isnt the first time they have done this (Blossom Dearie springs to mind) and it in no way adds to the aesthetic. I just dont get why they would go to all that trouble to make something worse?
They also edited out the photographers signature on the cover, which is properly disrespectful IMO, especially when celebrating the labels anniversary.
Even the DOL pressing from a few years ago used the original image. I know theres the argument that the OJC 2014 pressings used a different colour with darkened image, but even they kept the signature.
View attachment 23204
View attachment 23203