I understand the manager/tactics vs. the players argument around Spurs. Should Ange change his tactics for the players or is it the players who are poor. With Ange, you can point to games or times when it really, really works well. I think I’m back to being Ange in because I can see the improvement with better players coming back in.
As for United with Amorim, I don’t get it. The halftime discussion on NBC centered around is the manager hurting the club by sticking to his plan too rigidly with poor players? Or should he be more pragmatic and develop a plan that plays to this current squad’s strengths? Compared to Ange, I just don’t see what Amorim is trying to do. Given I haven’t watched too many United matches, but what exactly is he trying to do that can’t wait until next preseason? I think he should be doing all he can to win matches right now and not focus on how he wants to play. Next season half these players will be gone so it doesn’t matter if they fully adapt to his style or not.
Thoughts on Amorim so far
@Joe Mac?