Joe Mac
Well-Known Member
Sigur Ros, Smashing Pumpkins, Iron Maiden, New Order, Steely Dan….
I see what you did there! Sneaky!
Sigur Ros, Smashing Pumpkins, Iron Maiden, New Order, Steely Dan….
Every Wilco album I own (which is 2) are basically audiophile quality already. 2xLPs pressed at RTI in Stoughton jackets.Elliott Smith, Bjork, Fiona, Wilco, Mars Volta… to name a few.
Yes, a one-step of Siamese Dream, oh yeah!Sigur Ros, Smashing Pumpkins, Iron Maiden, New Order, Steely Dan….
I own 6 and would agree wholeheartedly.Every Wilco album I own (which is 2) are basically audiophile quality already. 2xLPs pressed at RTI in Stoughton jackets.
I would love to see audiophile reissues of many of the artists mentioned but would much rather they were normal ones than the insane one step price model.
I’d love to hear a reworked version of Rose Parade.Elliott Smith Either/Or is in desperate need of a remix on top of a remaster. The way that album was mixed is atrocious.
Need audiophile repressings of the Dan’s catalog on wax!I see what you did there! Sneaky!
I own them all. They do pay attention to detail and the new reissues are great.I own 6 and would agree wholeheartedly.
Imagine an audiophile master of any of Massive Attack. It could sound, well, massive. Add in Portishead and Tricky from that scene. What about The Smiths, they could sell tonnes of them. Jeff Buckley badly needs his stuff revisited for vinyl.
What I don’t understand is why doesn’t every label/artist take the same approach to vinyl that Neil Young and Wilco do? They consistently make fantastic pressings at very reasonable prices.TBH there are a ton of deserving albums through the last 30 years or so. I'm guessing it's a bit of a toss up which would benefit from the audiophile treatment, so many were recorded pretty poorly on the first place and made for CDs. However, would love Boom Boom or Bernie to have a crack at them. It's easy to do 'audiophile' with a lot of the old jazz & classical titles, I'm guessing much more hit & miss with everything else.
One of the albums thats springs to mind for me is Paul Weller Wild Wood, I was well pleased when I managed to pick up a copy of the repress a few months back, but really not that impressed on the first listen. Dare I say it, if I dug out the CD I wonder if it would sound better?
I think a lot don’t care. The difference between someone buying and not buying a vinyl album based on sound quality isn’t enough for most to worry about.What I don’t understand is why doesn’t every label/artist take the same approach to vinyl that Neil Young and Wilco do? They consistently make fantastic pressings at very reasonable prices.
TBH there are a ton of deserving albums through the last 30 years or so. I'm guessing it's a bit of a toss up which would benefit from the audiophile treatment, so many were recorded pretty poorly on the first place and made for CDs. However, would love Boom Boom or Bernie to have a crack at them. It's easy to do 'audiophile' with a lot of the old jazz & classical titles, I'm guessing much more hit & miss with everything else.
One of the albums that springs to mind for me is Paul Weller Wild Wood, I was well pleased when I managed to pick up a copy of the repress a few months back, but really not that impressed on the first listen. Dare I say it, if I dug out the CD I wonder if it would sound better?
I think a lot don’t care. The difference between someone buying and not buying a vinyl album based on sound quality isn’t enough for most to worry about.
I think a lot don’t care. The difference between someone buying and not buying a vinyl album based on sound quality isn’t enough for most to worry about.
I know we mostly all wanted something other than jazz. Hell… I’m a jazz fan and even I am getting a little tired of the constant barrage of jazz releases in these formats. But Concord largely owns jazz music (and show tunes) and people have complained for years that they are sitting on all this great material. I was hoping that it wouldn’t be a prestige title that was being repressed but as mentioned AP only got permission to repress back in November or so. These one steps have taken at least a year to produce. I had called Acoustic Sounds last summer to ask if there was any chance at a repress of some of these Prestige titles and was told that the likelihood was very high, Chad had tried a few times to get the rights again and Concord had said no.I guess I consider two audiophile-oriented releases at the same time to be done to death. It's a worthy release, but maybe it could have been the fifth or six One Step that they press instead of the third jazz title in a row.
For the ravens to peck out their eyeballs?train or counting crows ... I’m tying them to the damn tracks.
From what I understand, a good portion of those tapes are in poor condition, which is why they were adamant about transferring them to digital masters in 1982.Need audiophile repressings of the Dan’s catalog on wax!
These are my thoughts with Radiohead. Like if you were to wipe my brain and then ask me what band would care the most about their releases and the sound quality represented on them, I would pick Radiohead top three every time. For them to care so little about the quality of the music being sold to the public just blows my mind. I just don't get it. It seems to completely go against who they are as artists.What I don’t understand is why doesn’t every label/artist take the same approach to vinyl that Neil Young and Wilco do? They consistently make fantastic pressings at very reasonable prices.
I agree… to an extent. Bitches Brew I’m down for though because there really isn’t any remotely affordable great-sounding copy of it…I don’t wanna spend $300 on the older MoFi copy of it. I’m probably out on Somethin Else since I have the AP. I’d just like more non-jazz that’s actually well-produced and recorded to tape.I would like to put forth a motion to officially ban all Miles Davis titles from future fancy One Steps/UHQRs. We have enough Miles Davis, there are numerous audiophile pressings of every single Miles Davis album. We do not need any more, do something interesting.
These are my thoughts with Radiohead. Like if you were to wipe my brain and then ask me what band would care the most about their releases and the sound quality represented on them, I would pick Radiohead top three every time. For them to care so little about the quality of the music being sold to the public just blows my mind. I just don't get it. It seems to completely go against who they are as artists.