NegativeSo I haven't been keeping up. Are we still getting a 1099 if we sold more than $600?
Did they change it permanently or just punt another year?Negative
I believe 2024 reporting will be $5000/200 transactions.Did they change it permanently or just punt another year?
Reflections on the pictures!!!!
Yeah, I might try to fix that later. I need a light box or somethingReflections on the pictures!!!!
My whole house is overhead lighting and I can never get good pictures. It's annoying.Yeah, I might try to fix that later. I need a light box or something
Same.My whole house is overhead lighting and I can never get good pictures. It's annoying.
My whole house is overhead lighting and I can never get good pictures. It's annoying.
I usually put the numbers as they reflect on the labels. A1-6, B1-5. Unsure if that’s discogs policy though.
Yeah, I can’t ever figure that one out. Will check the guidelinesI usually put the numbers as they reflect on the labels. A1-6, B1-5. Unsure if that’s discogs policy though.
Would appear to be the correct way! Thanks!I usually put the numbers as they reflect on the labels. A1-6, B1-5. Unsure if that’s discogs policy though.
Another few weeks gone by, still no notifications. At this point, why not just merge messages and notifications? They still feel the same to me.I haven't gotten any "notifications" - but I assume it's for ads and shit.
I'm not too happy with Discogs - haven't been for a bit now. They just borked every label page - and now sorting or searching for something is either not easy or impossible.
But I really haven't been on the forums there for about a month or so -and my mental health is doing much better. I just make edits on releases I own - and go about my day.
Are you suggesting that discogs do something useful that a user might actually benefit from or at least not find actively antagonistic?Another few weeks gone by, still no notifications. At this point, why not just merge messages and notifications? They still feel the same to me.
entering a cd for the first time by a local artist. a few tracks have featured artists, two of which i am confident will be new to the database, but two others have multiple artists with that name, kenny mac and moses. kenny mac only has 7 entries, but the one or two entries that could potentially be the same have pretty much no info to go by. and moses has over 100 possibilities. no way i try and sort through that name. what's the best/appropriate approach here? enter a new kenny mac (8) and moses (1xx)? leave them out entirely and put in the notes? something else?
Personally, I would lean toward creating the new entry and then working to correct/combine down the line If it becomes evident they're actually one and the same with a previous entry.
As someone who bought something attributed to the (VERY) wrong artist once because the band had been entered as the same artist as a an all-woman hip hop group I was seeking more from. Fortunately it was a relatively inexpensive and mostly hilarious mistake and I fixed the credits and made sure both artists had entries, but even still I would much rather err in favour of having more artist entries than necessary to avoid a potential mix up for somebody.