Hi, how’s everyone doing? It’s been a while since I’ve been able to engage with the site properly.
I need some advice. I’m looking to get a hi fi, for my girlfriend’s house, the idea will be to move some records over there bit by bit.
She has squarish living room but not an ideal space to have speakers in a good listening position. 2 walls with doors, one with a fireplace and the other a near full length window. I was thinking maybe some small bookshelves speakers that I could move around and play with positioning a bit and wouldn’t be too imposing. Maybe some super dentons and get a sub at a future date if it was needed.
I’ve got a big living room with tall ceilings and an odd shaped room. A Musical Fidelity MS3i, Arcam phono stage. Old audiolab hidden away acting as a DAC, a fairly old Blusound node and a technical 1200g. B&w 683 s2. Mostly listen to records tv and streamed radio.
The system can sound amazing, generally sounds great but I’m sure like anything can be improved (probably a lot).
Apologies for the rambling pre-amble but thought context might help.
The question
Would a digital amp with Dirac sound as good, or better than the Musical Fidelity class A/b? I don’t really see any comparisons to different types of gear.
I was looking at the NAD M10 v3, which has Dirac, maybe for my place and take the MS3i to my girlfriends or vice versa.
I’ve been reading that a lot of modern amps sound the same but Dirac can make a huge difference. Is this the case? Do I need a Dirac amp? Can dirac help with poor speaker placement or listening position? Can act as an eq?
What would the NAD sound like compared to maybe the new Musical Fidelity A1? Would I be disappointed with a digital amp after always having class A? Or, would the digital NAd make records sound better?
If I was to get a Nad, would a sanded sized one like the c399 or the 3050 be better than the m10?
Confusing where to start