The unfortunate truth of this thread is that hot takes don't typically lend themselves to nuance, and no matter how much you try to present a more balanced view, it's the more incendiary parts of your post that will be zeroed in on. It's mostly my fault due to poor wording, but I'll try once again to present what I was trying to say in my original post.
I'll be blunt and say I probably enjoy FJM and Taylor close to equal amounts; that is to say, in moderate amounts. It's fair to say both artists have personas to a certain degree. My post was taking issue with elitist snobs of any gender that invariably look down on what's popular. I support liking both artists and that was in fact my entire argument. My first post about FJM and Taylor was a pretty quick off-the-cuff post that I didn't really intend to carry that much weight. In hindsight, I should have known a post that can be read as accusing an artist's fanbase in it's entirety of a quality would rustle feathers. I don't mean to offend anyone, but I would like to live in a world where liking I Love You, Honeybear and 1989 were treated with the same level of respect, but even the grand power of "poptimism" is no much for good old-fashioned indie elitism. Once again, I feel the need to state that I realize not every FJM is a snob, and generalizing an entire artist's fanbase as such is not an attitude I agree with. However, I see now my posts in here can be read as exactly that and for that, I apologize. That said, I still think the fact that Taylor gets an absurd of amount of vitriol thrown her way for daring to be a successful female singer-songwriter is an argument that exists outside of FJM and bringing him into it just muddles that point.