It's a 3rd sequel: Godzilla (2014) -> Kong: Skull Island (2017) -> Godzilla: KotM (2019) -> Godzilla v. KongI watched Godzilla vs Kong last night followed by The New Mutants. Both are on HBO MAX.
I don't know if it was because I was tending to cooking dinner and a bit distracted, byt I was completely lost in Godzilla vs King. The movie seemed like all action to me and not explanation of the plot. Did I miss something crucial or is this a sequel or something?
The New Mutants was decent, nothing special. I spent most of the movie wondering why one of the actresses looks some familiar and where I knew her from. Turns out she played the lead in The Queen's Gambit that I recently watched.
When Redux was first released, I caught a screening of it on an IMAX screen.Following a conversation with some friends of mine, I re-watched Apocalypse Now Redux last night.
I am more firmly convinced that the most righteous in moral character in that entire movie is Colonel Kurtz.
That’s not a very steep hill to climb.Following a conversation with some friends of mine, I re-watched Apocalypse Now Redux last night.
I am more firmly convinced that the most righteous in moral character in that entire movie is Colonel Kurtz.
In relation to the other characters in the movie, no it really isn’t. But I would take it further to say that not only is he just and moral, but he is also correct. And I mean that in a very real world sense.That’s not a very steep hill to climb.
It rulesI really oughta get around to watching Apocalypse Now...
I really oughta get around to watching Apocalypse Now...
Easily top tier in the 220 movies we've watched in quarantineI really oughta get around to watching Apocalypse Now...
I always kinda liked the idea of him finally coming across some emotional closure in that last half hour. His physical journey had ended, sure, but what to do when the story you told yourself in order to maintain your desire to live ends up being a lie? I think it's a necessary appendix, even if Zemeckis hits it a little clangingly, as is his habit.Watched Cast Away for the first time. I thought it was great except the ending.
Kind of seemed like they made the choice of having Helen Hunt remarried and didn't know what to do with Tom Hanks but decided to carry the movie on for another half an hour anyway.
I mean overall, I did like the movie too. But I almost felt the opposite about it, as in I don't feel like he got closure. I might have misinterpreted the ending but in the way that he kept her picture - it's almost like hes saying she's the one who kept him alive the 4 years and he's going to keep going and wait for her forever (thats at least what I got out of that Therapist? scene at the end). She still stringing him with hope for the future because she tells him that he's the love of her life and deep down its the same vice versa even though he rejects her. The movie did them both dirty.I always kinda liked the idea of him finally coming across some emotional closure in that last half hour. His physical journey had ended, sure, but what to do when the story you told yourself in order to maintain your desire to live ends up being a lie? I think it's a necessary appendix, even if Zemeckis hits it a little clangingly, as is his habit.
Great movie, though.
I feel like the ending showed him realizing he has possibilities in front of him once again, options. I never got the impression that Helen Hunt expected him to wait. She’d moved on. He was dead. She still loves him, and may always love him, but she can’t move back in time for him. She has a life. No matter what they may have been feeling in the moment, they ultimately knew they could simply blow things up and go back to how they were years ago.I mean overall, I did like the movie too. But I almost felt the opposite about it, as in I don't feel like he got closure. I might have misinterpreted the ending but in the way that he kept her picture - it's almost like hes saying she's the one who kept him alive the 4 years and he's going to keep going and wait for her forever (thats at least what I got out of that Therapist? scene at the end). She still stringing him with hope for the future because she tells him that he's the love of her life and deep down its the same vice versa even though he rejects her. The movie did them both dirty.
I also don't understand why he kept that woman's package the entire time. Like i get that he needs it to keep going but why her package specifically?
I also don't understand why he kept that woman's package the entire time. Like i get that he needs it to keep going but why her package specifically?
Going back to Humphrey Bogart films; 'In A Lonely Place' is another really great one.