kvetcha
Chet Hanks' Filmography Buff
I liked it more than most other DC movies and I donāt know what that says about me.Finally watched Wonder Woman 84
Jesus
that was Batman & Robin bad
I liked it more than most other DC movies and I donāt know what that says about me.Finally watched Wonder Woman 84
Jesus
that was Batman & Robin bad
I liked it more than most other DC movies and I donāt know what that says about me.
Itās not good either.Hot take: Batman & Robin isn't that bad.
ĀÆ\_(ć)_/ĀÆ
Itās not good either.
I still remember the sinking feeling I had in the theater at 13 years old during this scene:
these are basically my feelings on WW84.I guess for me a comic book movie feeling like a comic book isn't such a bad thing.
Correct but also, Batman Animated Series was a literal cartoon series at the time and itās take on the caped crusader was less campy and much more fun.I feel like to a lot of the comic book readers of the time, it felt more like a cartoon than a comic book.
I feel like to a lot of the comic book readers of the time, it felt more like a cartoon than a comic book. Certainly more like the 60s Adam West Batman than what the comics were producing, which looked a lot more like this:
Within a year or so of the movie's release, the comics would be launching a storyline in which a major earthquake causes Gotham to be uninhabitable and is cut off from the US as "No Man's Land," a story later mined by Nolan for TDKR (alongside the concept of Bane, which had actually originated in the comics during the Batman Forever film era). Audiences wanted to treat Batman like a serious character, and Schumacher made him a joke. I mean, say what you will about all of the Gothic eccentricities of Tim Burton, at least that Batman wasn't a punchline.
When an extremely popular, critically acclaimed children's cartoon called Batman: The Animated Series outclasses your multimillion dollar film in terms of writing, maturity, emotional depth, and complex characterization, you might have misjudged what your audiences are looking for. Arnold Schwarzenegger "kicking ice:" not it. Compare to:
Itās notās Nolanās fault. His Batman is a fine big budget action film. The fact that Warner Bros. decided to ape the success of those movies (along with Zach Snyderās 300) to diminishing returns over the next 15 years is more to blame.I will also say that I hate what Christopher Nolan did to superhero movies.
Correct. I love the 60s Batman series and the 70s Wonder Woman TV series. Batman & Robin is not one of those things.Things can be campy and also not bad.
The Dark Knight is a decent movie, anchored almost entirely by Heath Ledger. The other two in his trilogy were overly long bores that tried to make gritty realism work for the grown man dressed like a bat but forgot to do much else. His Batman films have no style to them outside of their lack of style; the fact that they are ashamed to be comic book movies is the beginning and end of their identity.Itās notās Nolanās fault. His Batman is a fine big budget action film. The fact that Warner Bros. decided to ape the success of those movies (along with Zach Snyderās 300) to diminishing returns over the next 15 years is more to blame.
I enjoyed all 3. Well, I should say I enjoyed parts of all 3. Ledger and Hardy are both utterly brilliant villains and there are fantastic action pieces in all 3. That being said each could probably lose about 30 to 45 minutes of sub plot and been even more effective. Even The Dark knight that is often held up as the pinnacle has, In My opinion; about 45 minutes of Unneeded Harvey Dent B-Plot tacked on to the ending. I think all 3 could have been nearly great with some extra editing.I will defend The Dark Knight, but I do not care for the two movies it's sandwiched between and I feel like people praise the trilogy as a whole when what they mean is they love TDK.