Trump's closest advisors are saying that the president will never concede.
He might eventually acknowledge the election results, but he wont concede.
He might eventually acknowledge the election results, but he wont concede.
Trump's closest advisors are saying that the president will never concede.
He might eventually acknowledge the election results, but he wont concede.
Laughable. As if his consistent refusal to ever admit he is wrong or has lost compares in any way to all of the tangible negatives he will leave behind as his legacy.At this point, whatever. Networks are claiming that the refusal to concede will hurt his "legacy" and the like, but all I see is a reign of terror.
Yup. Milking the rubes for as much as he can before the jig is up...I didn't see this on here yet, just that half the money would go to his campaign debts, but apparently for this "Official Election Defense Fund" 100% will go to other things than election defense (Save America PAC and the RNC) if your donation is under $8k.
Donations under $8K to Trump ‘election defense’ instead go to president, RNC
As President Donald Trump seeks to discredit last week's election with baseless claims of voter fraud, his team has bombarded his supporters with requests for money to help pay for legal challenges to the results: “The Left will try to STEAL this election!” reads one text.mobile.reuters.com
Yup. Milking the rubes for as much as he can before the jig is up...
View attachment 74397
Seems like another one of his typical lawsuits. They've all been thrown out due to lack of evidence.This would be a lot of votes thrown out, including mine.
Federal lawsuit seeks to throw out 1.2M votes, flipping Michigan for Trump
A new lawsuit seeks to prevent votes in three counties from being counted.www.mlive.com
Can they actually do that?
nopeThis would be a lot of votes thrown out, including mine.
Federal lawsuit seeks to throw out 1.2M votes, flipping Michigan for Trump
A new lawsuit seeks to prevent votes in three counties from being counted.www.mlive.com
Can they actually do that?
Nail HeadYou would think evidence of such widespread voter fraud would be easy to find 9 days after the election. Unless...it doesn't exist of course.
nope
last paragraph.
no idea why this website decided to give this lawsuit some oxygen, it's not even submitted from the GOP, it's just 4 randos
View attachment 74491
There has however been mass quantities of voters being purged from voting roles before elections via GOP obstructionismJust curious, historically has there ever been a time where mass quantities of votes were purged (including legal ballots) because of suspected fraud. This seems like it would be unconstitutional because you basically denied someone's right to vote.
Not due to “suspected fraud” there have obviously been multitudes of voter suppression (of minorities and women, etc...) over our countries history but all these attempts to toss out votes is gonna be a bridge too far. Thankfully the Courts and States are there to check the Executive and Federal Government.Just curious, historically has there ever been a time where mass quantities of votes were purged (including legal ballots) because of suspected fraud. This seems like it would be unconstitutional because you basically denied someone's right to vote.
Another case of the disease we find ourselves incapable of curing, where lies are free but facts cost money.
Hey let’s check in on what a former forum member and current fascist cheerleader is up to these days:
If only we hadn’t run off these serious opposition thinkers...