Political Discussion

While I don't think I'm ever going 100% @Chucktshoes , lol, I am sitting firmly in his camp of "They're all full of shit and could care less about WE THE PEOPLE".

Politics have been about business for a long time now, it has nothing to do with the people. As it's been said, it's not about policy and change, it's about who can present themselves the best, who can sell you shit on a stick with a smile on their face convincingly. It's like my wife picking the winning team in a football game based on the uniforms. When voting became a "Lesser of two evils" proposition, the writing was on the wall.

Call me when the majority of the old white guys are dead and gone and I'll start paying attention again. My uncle in Italy works for Fiat, I remember when I lived there that they always seemed to be on strike for one reason or another. I would see him and he'd tell us all the chaos and shouting and dirt being kicked up, all the chanting, demanding, just a major dust up, EVERY TIME. But after the dust settled, every time, things didn't really change, they were always appeased with the most minimal possible "bone". That's our government, that's how they function, but not for US, but for their agenda's.

Got one on the line, now to set the hook! 😂😂
 
Saw this tweet and then got sad about the 2000 election again



I mentioned this to a co-worker who grew up in Tennessee. He's leans republican, as expected where he grew up.

His thoughts on this was "Fake News".

Sure, the Deficit could have been eliminated. But the recession would have hit much sooner and much harder and probably would have been worse than the Great Depression. The tax cuts are what kept our economy afloat longer and from crashing so badly.

What are all your thoughts on this one?
 
I mentioned this to a co-worker who grew up in Tennessee. He's leans republican, as expected where he grew up.

His thoughts on this was "Fake News".

Sure, the Deficit could have been eliminated. But the recession would have hit much sooner and much harder and probably would have been worse than the Great Depression. The tax cuts are what kept our economy afloat longer and from crashing so badly.

What are all your thoughts on this one?
I think there's an awful lot of speculation in that number.
I also think that since most of our neoliberal policies of market deregulation and privatization of public services was already in full effect in the Clinton era, that this argument doesn't really hold water. I think that it didn't matter what tax structure was left afterward, because the damage was already being done. The 1980's ushered in a new era where money and politics were more and more incestuously aligned than ever before. We could have, and should have stopped it with anti-trust laws that were already on the books, but we obviously didn't learn from our history and robber barons, that it's a bad idea to have private industry and politics so buddy-buddy. I don't think we could have prevented the deficit by keeping a tax structure in place.

This is not the only reason we are in a lurch, but it's part of it. The other, and possibly bigger part of this is that since the government isn't really worried about workers rights, it was around this time (W's presidency) that white collar workers' wages went as static as blue collar workers wages went two decades before. I think it was the hit to middle class worker's wages that is really impacting us--probably more than keeping Clinton's taxes in place. We don't have a surplus, because neither does the American worker. You can't have a tax structure that relies only on the rich. Consider this:

The growth in income in recent decades has tilted to upper-income households. At the same time, the U.S. middle class, which once comprised the clear majority of Americans, is shrinking. Thus, a greater share of the nation’s aggregate income is now going to upper-income households and the share going to middle- and lower-income households is falling.9

The share of American adults who live in middle-income households has decreased from 61% in 1971 to 51% in 2019. This downsizing has proceeded slowly but surely since 1971, with each decade thereafter typically ending with a smaller share of adults living in middle-income households than at the beginning of the decade.

And Covid has pushed more Americans out of the middle class. If wages are artificially kept low because of monopolistic collusion on wages and less people are making a livable wage, this means lower tax revenues. In order to get back these lost tax dollars, we would have to drastically tax corporations and the rich who are benefiting from the monopolistic collusion on wages. Our politicians aren't ready to stand up for workers and against monopolies, so I don't think we'll be seeing anything but deficit.
 
He seemed fairly cogent to me last night, but leaving that aside for a moment, I think this analysis also overlooks how the general public simply sees Biden as a compassionate person. Joe Biden is almost uniquely positioned among living American politicians to be able to speak to people in their grief amidst a global crisis that has exacted half a million American casualties, and make them believe that he actually understands what they’re going through.

Now — some of that is myth-building, of course, the perfect meeting of the Man and his Moment, the event that his entire life has prepared him for.

But he genuinely has suffered, and has worn that grief in front of people publicly for decades, only to have to renew it when Beau died, such that it looked like his life in public service would be bookended by tragic circumstances. To some degree it doesn’t really matter how much of that persona is myth versus reality, though, because he makes people *feel* like he understands their losses, and grieves with them, irrespective of his age.

In that regard, I do not think “this old man is less bad than that old man” holds up as a sufficient explanation of how we got here. Some of that, for sure—a lot of it, even—but he has several qualifications on his own merits, some of which are difficult to quantify or sound corny when they are pointed out. Whether or not that resonates with you individually, I think we’re in a time where it’s maybe more important to many people than they realize or want to admit.
Admittedly, none of that resonates with me regarding Biden. I don’t look at politicians in that way at all. Their personal myth building is all just meaningless noise to me because I know it is complete and total bullshit.

So I’m pretty incapable of weighing in on that because the idea that folks believe or connect with that is so foreign to me. I literally don’t understand how people feel personally connected to or invested in politicians. Then again, people become obsessed with and send love letters to serial killers too.

People are weird.
 
Admittedly, none of that resonates with me regarding Biden. I don’t look at politicians in that way at all. Their personal myth building is all just meaningless noise to me because I know it is complete and total bullshit.

So I’m pretty incapable of weighing in on that because the idea that folks believe or connect with that is so foreign to me. I literally don’t understand how people feel personally connected to or invested in politicians. Then again, people become obsessed with and send love letters to serial killers too.

People are weird.
I acknowledge the personal losses Biden has endured, I acknowledge the warmth he exudes. I think Biden is a one-term president. His insistance on this arcane concept of bipartisanship is already impacting the lives of millions of Americans. This wait-and-see game regarding the filibuster, standing sheepishly on the side during a doomed impeachment proceeding, putting immigration reform on the backburner...

Democrats will keep losing election cycles because they want white voters back who split back in the 1970's.
 
He seemed fairly cogent to me last night, but leaving that aside for a moment, I think this analysis also overlooks how the general public simply sees Biden as a compassionate person. Joe Biden is almost uniquely positioned among living American politicians to be able to speak to people in their grief amidst a global crisis that has exacted half a million American casualties, and make them believe that he actually understands what they’re going through.

this goes back to @sarcasticfairyprincess 's post and the everyman appeal of some candidates. Part of the reason Bill Clinton won so readily was he had definitely suffered and that resonated with a lot of people; growing up poor and the child of a single mother. There was a reason why Toni Morrison called him America's first black president and it wasn't just because he played sax on Arsenio. In some ways, that was also part of Dubya's appeal -- most of white conservative and religious america looked at his past drug use and finding religion and sobriety and people underestimating him and saw some of themselves in him.
 
What was sheepish about it?

I don’t necessarily think Biden is “insisting on arcane concepts” of bipartisanship, even though that’s the kind of language he’s using. I think it’s more about trying to restore a broader sense that a government can work for all the people and not just the people who voted it in. I think there’s also an undercurrent of building political capital and goodwill for Kamala; when he mentioned his upcoming tour to sell the recovery act, I found it notable that he explicitly mentioned Harris & Emhoff accompanying him and Jill. I think there will be a subtle but very large effort to build paths for her to speak to red state voters in his voice, to demonstrate a core decency that she shares with him (or so the goal will be anyway).



I think the difference with Biden is that in addition to the usual bullshit, there’s just no denying that his family was destroyed, twice, with the first tragedy likely bearing on the second insofar as Hunter’s well-documented issues are concerned.

There’s no need for the extra trappings of hagiography to make people consider the kind of heartbreak those kinds of losses entail. Suffering in and of itself doesn’t make a person good, but people are always on the lookout for someone who they feel has remained good in spite of it.*

*Assuming that person started off as good in the first place, which Is a premise I know we don’t both agree to.
Yeah, I don’t know that I have anything actually constructive to add to this portion of the conversation. Everything I would have to say at this point is just varying versions of “Biden is a horrible person and we have 50 years of political record as evidence of that.”

As a father I have empathy for the pain he’s suffered but that doesn’t have any bearing on who he is as a person and a politician. Losing a child doesn’t magically make bad people into good people. Biden has decades on record showing exactly how much of a piece of shit he is. Sympathy plays fall flat with me.
 
Yeah I mean I’m on the same page with you about most* of that, just saying I think these perceptions of him played an actual role in the election, deserved or not.
Gotcha.

I don’t really think so. Other than the media who’s falling over themselves to prop Biden up in a nearly Pravda-like fashion, I don’t know anybody who even likes Biden. Even the folks I know who voted for him didn’t like or have any real faith in him. This last election was 100% about him being not Trump. I think the attempts to make Biden look good are just the rationalization of a terrible choice now that the post orgasmic bliss of defeating Trump is starting to fade. A lot like a someone trying to find good excuses for their actions the night before during the morning walk of shame home.
 
Gotcha.

I don’t really think so. Other than the media who’s falling over themselves to prop Biden up in a nearly Pravda-like fashion, I don’t know anybody who even likes Biden. Even the folks I know who voted for him didn’t like or have any real faith in him. This last election was 100% about him being not Trump. I think the attempts to make Biden look good are just the rationalization of a terrible choice now that the post orgasmic bliss of defeating Trump is starting to fade. A lot like a someone trying to find good excuses for their actions the night before during the morning walk of shame home.
What Biden provides that no president has provided for a long while, is for a good chunk of America the ability to now actively ignore the Presidency. I personally was quite fond of Obama as a President but acknowledged that he triggered vitriol on the Right that was unprecedented. Obviously Trump was a bit of a reaction to that combined with the Left deciding to run another extremely unlikable candidate in Hillary but he engendered much of the same vitriolic hatred from the Left. For your “Average American voter” they don’t love or hate Biden; they don’t think much about him at all and I think that is why he won the election and why his approval numbers are still on the positive side even in these highly polarized times.
 
Dental Insurance is the biggest joke ever. All it does is basically cover your yearly cleanings and nothing beyond that. At least mine that is. Luckily I'm young and my teeth are in good health.

We have MetLife from work, and MetLife has $2,000 coverage per year in-network or $1,000 a year coverage out-of-network plus yo have to pay 20% of the bill.

There isn't a singe dentists office within a 25 mile radius of me that is "in-network". So of course my dentist is out-of-network.

When I have talked to the dentist office about being in-network they said MetLife negotiated rates to too low. They aren't going to become part of the network unless MetLife budges and pays a reasonable rate.

My old small town father son dentist owned office was out-of-network as well. But they never charged the 20% co-pay. They always waived it. It's just something they always did and I never asked for. But out in Eastern Massachusetts, everything is part of a large Dental Group and charging that 20% is absolutely not negotiable.


I have heard of co-workers getting cavities filled and coming home with a $1400 bill.
 
What was sheepish about it?
I think Biden has the unenviable positions of trying to figure out how to deal with the 1/6 coup. I think he's afraid to seem too involved in the Justice Department's investigation and prosecution of the event. I think Joe Biden left Nancy Pelosi and Chuck Schumer to clean up the mess and for the sake of political expediency, the trial was prematurely adjourned. And it's tragic. Because accountability doesn't matter.

The guy can't walk and chew gum at the same time.
 
Accountability in politics is like corporate social responsibility. Both are great concepts but I have yet to see them in practice.
Amen. And I think this comes back to precedent set by Gerald Ford. Americans love to use their sense of hospitality and kindness as reasons to ignore the shitty behavior of people who say racist/misognistic shit for the sake of civility and union. It's absurd. And the discourse gets dumber and our grasp on reality becomes more tenuous.
 
Back
Top