Fleetwood-Matt
Well-Known Member
And the route they are taking from this to banning and outlawing trans identities is so obvious and so fucking slimy it really makes me sick
It is truly the stupidest timeline.I hate this timeline.
Let them try to ban pride down here, nope! Not gonna happen.At this rate, the GOP will be banning Pride before too long. Because, you know, it's common sense child safety and don't say gay.
Religion has no place in politics as it often leads to discrimination.
On the Fort Wayne Line of the Keystone Division, NS has equipped their rail network with HBD systems to assess the temperature conditions of wheel bearings while en route. The function of the HBD is to detect overheated bearings and provide audible real-time warnings to train crews. Train 32N passed three HBD systems on its trip before the derailment. At MP 79.9, the suspect bearing from the 23rd car had a recorded temperature of 38°F above ambient temperature. When train 32N passed the next HBD, at MP 69.01, the bearing’s recorded temperature was 103°F above ambient. The third HBD, at MP 49.81, recorded the suspect bearing’s temperature at 253°F above ambient. NS has established the following HBD alarm thresholds (above ambient temperature) and criteria for bearings:
- Between 170°F and 200°F, warm bearing (non-critical); stop and inspect
- A difference between bearings on the same axle greater than or equal to 115°F (non-critical); stop and inspect
- Greater than 200°F (critical); set out railcar
It is truly the stupidest timeline.
Let them try to ban pride down here, nope! Not gonna happen.
This is a great point. Am I in drag if I wear men’s clothes? How would anyone know if I am wearing men’s jeans or just “boyfriend” cut jeans? Or is this just targeting men in dresses? If so, isn’t that gender discrimination?Right? Completely aside from the immorality of trying to ban these things, they're also being really, really stupid about it, because they're setting themselves up to have to quell absolutely massive episodes of civil disobedience that consist of, what, wearing clothes that were sold in the women's section of the store? Can somebody even give me a legal definition for "drag" please? Anybody besides this esteemed attorney I mean.
Well I have some bad news for my 4yo son who was wearing his sister's purple space cat PJs last night...This is a great point. Am I in drag if I wear men’s clothes? How would anyone know if I am wearing men’s jeans or just “boyfriend” cut jeans? Or is this just targeting men in dresses? If so, isn’t that gender discrimination?
depends, are you looking like a cute sexy lady or are you looking like a gross mannish butch lesbian. I think you're forgetting that being gay is allowed if both chicks are hotThis is a great point. Am I in drag if I wear men’s clothes? How would anyone know if I am wearing men’s jeans or just “boyfriend” cut jeans? Or is this just targeting men in dresses? If so, isn’t that gender discrimination?
Well fuck. I played Pretty Pretty Princess with my daughter the other night too. Would the plastic earrings and tiara send me to the gulags as well?
This is a great point. Am I in drag if I wear men’s clothes? How would anyone know if I am wearing men’s jeans or just “boyfriend” cut jeans? Or is this just targeting men in dresses? If so, isn’t that gender discrimination?
And would a cheerleader wearing her boyfriends letterman be in drag?
We have a teacher at my school, who I closely work with who wears “women’s”earrings, paints his nails, and has long hair. Other than that those are the only “feminine” traits. His persona is more that of a construction worker. But he’s one of the best teachers I work with as as getting kids with disabilities motivates and in track.Well fuck. I played Pretty Pretty Princess with my daughter the other night too. Would the plastic earrings and tiara send me to the gulags as well?
I’m not the smartest, but what standing do the plaintiffs actually have for a rule that is over 20yrs old? Also doesn’t this contradict what SCOTUS ruled in their overturning, that states have final say on this topic?
If I'm reading this right, the SCOTUS as early as today could issue a ruling that bans abortions induced by medications nation wide?
Edit: Actually, it's worse than that. A sole Conservative District judge is ruling on this lawsuit. And this his ruling would have the biggest impact on abortions by the courts since the SCOTUS overturned Roe.