Nee Lewman
बैस्टर्ड
So how do Trump’s voters reconcile that last time he did or attempted to do every terrible thing he ran on and the fact that the stuff he has been saying this time is worse?
Agreed but here It’s the “Mandatory” portion that violates the 1st amendment especially when the mandate is specific to the Bible.I’m ok with teaching the Bible as a historical document, and teaching about the basics of what the religion believes. There was a whole unit in my 7th grade history class on the basics of the Muslim faith and I remember finding that fascinating. Religion is so intertwined with all facets of history that everyone should have a baseline knowledge of what each one believes and how those beliefs have shaped the world.
Obviously that is not what the right is doing here but I thought it was worth mentioning
Revisionist history, they blame Biden and the Deep State.So how do Trump’s voters reconcile that last time he did or attempted to do every terrible thing he ran on and the fact that the stuff he has been saying this time is worse?
Also, Ketanji Brown Jackson seems cool with them too.We've got (at least) two members of the Supreme Court who have expressed support for the January 6th insurrectionists, and they are ruling on cases affecting the prosecution of insurrectionists. This is fucked beyond belief.
This is where some enterprising lawyers need to sue to make sure Muslim, Hindu, and Native people's religions are also being taught in Oklahoma schools. That's the fastest way to get this order rescinded.
I don’t want to read any of these decisions, can someone summarize for me how the Jan 6 rioters weren’t guilty of Obstruction?
That makes my head hurt.Pretty much that the obstruction law wasn't intended to be used in a situation like this, thus they should have never been charged with obstruction. The SCOTUS narrowed / defined what qualifies as Obstruction.
It’s a technicality in how the law was written, it was written in response to the whole Enron fiasco. The majority doesn’t feel that the law can be applied in the way that it was because it was not specifically written in that way. The dissenting opinion by Comey-Barrett said that though it’s was not written to specifically address the action of January 6th it’s written broadly enough that a prosecutor should be able to apply it to these cases.I don’t want to read any of these decisions, can someone summarize for me how the Jan 6 rioters weren’t guilty of Obstruction?
Actually he can vote? Turns out this is a state thing not a fed thing?Riddle me this- a convicted felon is stripped of the right to vote (unless they get them restored) but a convicted felon can run for President? I don’t get it.
Hey now. I'll have you know that my love for the 2004 masterwork Van Helsing is 100% genuine and justifiable.Nostalgia is a hell of a drug. Just spend some time around here.
Actually he can vote? Turns out this is a state thing not a fed thing?
Within the last half hour the LA Times and the Miami Herald put out pieces saying Biden needs to be replaced for the good of the country.
Don't think it's surprising but I do wonder if the media narrative will burst the dam.
The LA piece says he needs to put the country first by pulling out, the Miami piece says the Dems need to just do it regardless.Within the last half hour the LA Times and the Miami Herald put out pieces saying Biden needs to be replaced for the good of the country.
Don't think it's surprising but I do wonder if the media narrative will burst the dam.