They uh... they burned the building down...
HAY! You made it! They gave us 48 hours notice they were nuking the forum for basically no reason beyond some vague insufferable corporate speak. So @AnthonyI crowdfunded $1000 towards a new site, got $3500 in about 24 hours, he in conjunction with all the mods you see on the site built this in about 1.5 days and we all came over here and watched the VMP forum blip out of existence.I'm gone for five damned minutes and the forum dies??!?!? Someone fill me in. What the fuck happened??
We never got much of an explanation. Something new (and vague) is coming. They couldn't handle having the forum AND come up with this new mystery thing. They needed to be more "intentional" (actual word used as an excuse like 50 times). Gave us 48 hours notice then shut 'er down. Some kind and creative folks banded together and made this new (better) home for us! That's about the most condensed version of the odd story I can offer!I'm gone for five damned minutes and the forum dies??!?!? Someone fill me in. What the fuck happened??
I'm gone for five damned minutes and the forum dies??!?!? Someone fill me in. What the fuck happened??
I'm gone for five damned minutes and the forum dies??!?!? Someone fill me in. What the fuck happened??
And here I assumed it was because I whined one too many times about their obscene pricing. I'd rather blame you.It's all probably referenced one way or another in more detail over the last 10 pages or so -- if you really felt like going through the effort of piecing all that bullshit together like a jigsaw covered in garbage filth -- but I got the weird impression that it probably had something with me being too handsome. It upsets people.
And here I assumed it was because I whined one too many times about their obscene pricing. I'd rather blame you.
Looks like the old forum URL is now redirecting to the magazine article about them closing the forum.
I wonder how they feel about this new forum making fun of them all the time
There's a link here, too.
Well... that's something. I wonder if there was any debate about doing that, or not.
It does IMO give less credence to the notion that they were anti-criticism and that’s what ultimately made their decision final. They must know how much they have been bad-mouthed here so to direct people here seems counterintuitive to me if this was their reasoning.
It does IMO give less credence to the notion that they were anti-criticism and that’s what ultimately made their decision final. They must know how much they have been bad-mouthed here so to direct people here seems counterintuitive to me if this was their reasoning.
How did you get there? The old link doesn't redirect you.
Immediately popped into my head: