A lot of these reasons double as reasons why I quit being a moderator. Though I was never bullied by staff, I did feel like we moderators were left to fend for ourselves a lot, with growing (legitimate!) dissent from some of VMP's most loyal customers. There were many arguments in threads that would have been better handled with a voice from VMP, not the people who volunteered to help out and in exchange for hours of work, got an occasional free record or store credit.
Were we perfect? Of course not. But we were trying. I'm sorry for moving stuff around
@helllord but I'm so glad you're back. Those early days were so great.
I'd never want to moderate that fiasco. Just look at the final days. They dropped a bomb and just let speculation go apeshit. Then we were made to feel as if, by asking questions and playing into that which was created by design, it meant the toxicity was bred by us. It was like the most horrific of Twilight Zone episodes. They refused to divulge information about any of the issues they created from price hikes, overselling albums, missing shipments, and lack of replacements, to even what exactly they were selling and at what price. I can only imagine trying to moderate a situation like that when I'm not being provided with information myself. I envy nobody in that position.
Things chilled out to a degree when Pauly and Storf tried to step in and finally speak at the tail end, but it was still a bunch of double speak -- I preferred Storf's wrasslin' memes, to the bogus explanations. Think about what Pauly said. He said that he felt that being vague was the best approach? Seriously? If Matt was tone deaf, what was that? Lack of transparency was the core of the issues, because, you're essentially telling people they need to trust you, while continually giving them more and more reason not to.
But... that's all dead and I don't really want to give them anymore attention or energy -- I called them out for it there/then. I only mention it as a reminder of what we don't want and an acknowledgement of the position any moderators might have been in. VMP expressed that their focus was to reach new people and to create a different community. The clown with the YouTube channel and Billboard got info, while we were stonewalled. Any outreach here isn't to creat a "different" community, or an attempt to adjust this one to something that reflects a brand.
We already like us. We don't have that mission. We should be defending what's great here, not trying to work to bring in anything to change it. If what's good expands somehow, that's great, but again, expanding just to expand... I mostly just want to make sure anyone left behind can find us.
What's still so amazing to me is that there is no product here. There is no central focus on a brand other than us. Scouts left, found new land and sent out the alert. We came like little ants and rebuilt it better. People set up tents, constructed shelters, dug digital latrines and soup kitchens. It actually feels like that to me. Members are making their own spaces and spaces for each other. We're still setting up.
I respect and appreciate everyone who put in the time and energy to make sure this place happened. I also appreciate that you all haven't completely relaxed behind the scenes and are already focusing on the future and making sure it's sustainable. The fact that we made it here at all, however, does demonstrate that the community itself is sustainable, even when the structure is pulled out from under us. That's a powerful truth that should carry this forward. This dialog is important and it's good to feel like we are all on a similar page. Those who are administrators shouldn't have to feel alone in this struggle, like they may have in the past. We're all responsible for this place and regulating and maintaining it as it continues to evolve.