Hhabelt
Active Member
I totally agree with all of this. I guess I just mean to say in theory there's stakes, but in actuality no, as long as they keep using all the same characters of course we already know what happens to them. But Rogue One is by far my favorite of all the post OG trilogy movies and simply due to the nature of its story it of course has zero actual stakes, we all know what happens. But it felt like it did, and at this point in terms of terrible Nu Star Wars projects, that's enough for me.
See, I also enjoyed Rogue One A LOT and wondered if I was being hypocritical above, but I don't think so. Rogue One felt like an extended cut that provided a new set of characters that almost anything could happen to. This probably only works if there's enough time to form an attachment to at least one of them, but it works for me. I don't feel that Kenobi allows for that. Give me ten plus episodes and Kenobi surrounded by a new cast of characters and I might be more intrigued.
I do understand how you mean, but I just don't think I feel it. During the battle I even thought the score didn't make it feel important. It felt off. Side note: I was a little bit hoping it wasn't a physical confrontation, but a mental one.
A minor shift in perspective and the show could easily be called either Leia or Vader. Is it that generic? I dunno *shrug* but I have already seen Star Wars Adventures in Babysitting.