Television

Bull Shannon said:
It's like a gritty version of Twin Peaks where each season is its own separate Blue Rose case.
Click to expand...
Looks like Season 4 True Detective has been throwing out some pretty notable callbacks to season one that I wasn’t aware of but I am starting to think I need to rewatch Season 1.
www.forbes.com

Yes, ‘True Detective’ Season 4 Is A Direct Sequel To ‘True Detective’ Season 1

Season 1 connections to True Detective: Night Country are now being made explicit. It really is a direct follow-up season to the original.
www.forbes.com www.forbes.com
 
True Detective S04E03 question (spoiler alerted for your non-viewing pleasure)

Danvers is telling Pete about the last case she worked with Navarro. At the end she says to Pete that by the time they got to the place (murder-suicide spot - I forget names) that both were already. But the flashback only shows the woman dead and the dude whistling or whatever in a chair w/ Navarro and Danvers pointing guns. Please help my smooth brain out: is the implication that one of them killed the guy (i.e. on-the-spot justice)?

Oh...and if that is the implication, which one do you think meted out the justice for which the other (presumably) was not comfortable, hence the falling out.
 
Our Baby Diaper of God said:
True Detective S04E03 question (spoiler alerted for your non-viewing pleasure)

Danvers is telling Pete about the last case she worked with Navarro. At the end she says to Pete that by the time they got to the place (murder-suicide spot - I forget names) that both were already. But the flashback only shows the woman dead and the dude whistling or whatever in a chair w/ Navarro and Danvers pointing guns. Please help my smooth brain out: is the implication that one of them killed the guy (i.e. on-the-spot justice)?

Oh...and if that is the implication, which one do you think meted out the justice for which the other (presumably) was not comfortable, hence the falling out.
Click to expand...
Yes, I think that is absolutely the implication. As to which one did the deed, I don't think we have enough info to know yet. My money is on Navarro
 
Our Baby Diaper of God said:
True Detective S04E03 question (spoiler alerted for your non-viewing pleasure)

Danvers is telling Pete about the last case she worked with Navarro. At the end she says to Pete that by the time they got to the place (murder-suicide spot - I forget names) that both were already. But the flashback only shows the woman dead and the dude whistling or whatever in a chair w/ Navarro and Danvers pointing guns. Please help my smooth brain out: is the implication that one of them killed the guy (i.e. on-the-spot justice)?

Oh...and if that is the implication, which one do you think meted out the justice for which the other (presumably) was not comfortable, hence the falling out.
Click to expand...

I watched it last night...

I thought the same thing - one of them killed him and the other was pissed. Danvers strikes me as the more by-the-book cop so I'll hazard a guess that it was Navarro that shot him

Not spoiler related:
I'm watching this season but not loving it. It's just ok. Maybe it's me, but this season isn't moving me much, or creeping me out.
 
Our Baby Diaper of God said:
True Detective S04E03 question (spoiler alerted for your non-viewing pleasure)

Danvers is telling Pete about the last case she worked with Navarro. At the end she says to Pete that by the time they got to the place (murder-suicide spot - I forget names) that both were already. But the flashback only shows the woman dead and the dude whistling or whatever in a chair w/ Navarro and Danvers pointing guns. Please help my smooth brain out: is the implication that one of them killed the guy (i.e. on-the-spot justice)?

Oh...and if that is the implication, which one do you think meted out the justice for which the other (presumably) was not comfortable, hence the falling out.
Click to expand...
ranbalam said:
I watched it last night...

I thought the same thing - one of them killed him and the other was pissed. Danvers strikes me as the more by-the-book cop so I'll hazard a guess that it was Navarro that shot him
Click to expand...
Funny thing: I assumed he was dead and Danvers had some hallucination or (more likely imo atm) was remembering the man whistling Twist and Shout as an artistic indicator that she was haunted by what she found there. I mean, this is a show where a crime scene was pointed out by a ghost only seen by one person, and an episode where a man unable to stop screaming in pain suddenly sits up and delivers a message in a Monster Voice, also only seen by one person. In typical TD form, the supernatural elements come with a plausible deniability.

Reading y'alls' opinions and thinking back, there was no blood or weapon near him, so I'm starting to lean towards the murder you're describing. But then I want to know why/how Twist and Shout just happens to be playing during the most haunting moments of Danvers' life.

Leading me to:
ranbalam said:
Not spoiler related:
I'm watching this season but not loving it. It's just ok. Maybe it's me, but this season isn't moving me much, or creeping me out.
Click to expand...
I was initially hooked but I'm starting to cross my arms and wonder where this is going. The individual cops' stories are a little thin (they kinda just boil down to "tough and determined"), and I'm starting to feel like we're going to get several episodes of brooding with light developments on the investigation, culminating in a reveal and an ending. I don't really speculate or follow the investigation closely when I watch detective/noir shows, so the color and incidence of the investigation is more important to me than the unveiling of clues, and once you get past the setting and culture, there's not much here.
 
Bull Shannon said:
I was initially hooked but I'm starting to cross my arms and wonder where this is going. The individual cops' stories are a little thin (they kinda just boil down to "tough and determined"), and I'm starting to feel like we're going to get several episodes of brooding with light developments on the investigation, culminating in a reveal and an ending. I don't really speculate or follow the investigation closely when I watch detective/noir shows, so the color and incidence of the investigation is more important to me than the unveiling of clues, and once you get past the setting and culture, there's not much here.
Click to expand...
Pretty much where I am at with this as well. Not sure where it is going with only 3 eps left. Felt like it touched on the hocus pocus voodoo stuff as a call back for fans or something. That and so many of the main characters are not pleasant and I really don’t care if they live or die from a random polar bear attack.
 
jamieanderson1968 said:
Pretty much where I am at with this as well. Not sure where it is going with only 3 eps left. Felt like it touched on the hocus pocus voodoo stuff as a call back for fans or something. That and so many of the main characters are not pleasant and I really don’t care if they live or die from a random polar bear attack.
Click to expand...
Really don't care or hoping for? I know which camp I'm in...
 
TenderLovingKiller® said:
I am enjoying Season 4 but I am easy. I enjoyed all 4 seasons. It’s quality television, well made and well acted. It’s more entertaining than most of what’s on TV. I am fine with unlikable leads Tony Soprano and Don Draper were assholes too.
Click to expand...
Not hating it, just not connecting with it like the other seasons. Will still watch it happily
 
TenderLovingKiller® said:
I am enjoying Season 4 but I am easy. I enjoyed all 4 seasons. It’s quality television, well made and well acted. It’s more entertaining than most of what’s on TV. I am fine with unlikable leads Tony Soprano and Don Draper were assholes too.
Click to expand...
It's hard (for me, anyway) not to compare it to other seasons. S1 had me all-in and excited to see each episode as it aired.
But I agree, it's quality TV.

I think we'll watch Masters of the Air next. Or maybe For All Mankind.
 
TenderLovingKiller® said:
Looks like Season 4 True Detective has been throwing out some pretty notable callbacks to season one that I wasn’t aware of but I am starting to think I need to rewatch Season 1.
www.forbes.com

Yes, ‘True Detective’ Season 4 Is A Direct Sequel To ‘True Detective’ Season 1

Season 1 connections to True Detective: Night Country are now being made explicit. It really is a direct follow-up season to the original.
www.forbes.com www.forbes.com
Click to expand...

I saw those! I'm totally into this current season. And Jodie Foster is an absolute gem.
 
Our Baby Diaper of God said:
True Detective S04E03 question (spoiler alerted for your non-viewing pleasure)

Danvers is telling Pete about the last case she worked with Navarro. At the end she says to Pete that by the time they got to the place (murder-suicide spot - I forget names) that both were already. But the flashback only shows the woman dead and the dude whistling or whatever in a chair w/ Navarro and Danvers pointing guns. Please help my smooth brain out: is the implication that one of them killed the guy (i.e. on-the-spot justice)?

Oh...and if that is the implication, which one do you think meted out the justice for which the other (presumably) was not comfortable, hence the falling out.
Click to expand...



Yes. Navarro is my guess based on the way Danvers is acting with her, but also she didn't rat her out because the guy still deserved the justice. But nothing is ever that clear on this show is it?
 
Turbo said:
Yes. Navarro is my guess based on the way Danvers is acting with her, but also she didn't rat her out because the guy still deserved the justice. But nothing is ever that clear on this show is it?
Click to expand...
Yup, that would be my guess too on who did the deed. Navarro seems to have a keen of justice that is a priori to legality, if that makes sense.
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top