That money talks would have been a better choice!
I think Patrice Rushen, Albert King, and The Bar-Kays have been three terrible picks for three different reasons this year and are among the worst picks in the series.
Rushen isn't a bad album per se, but it is pretty dated, doesn't fit the Classics parameters, and didn't need a deluxe reissue version.
Albert King is 100 percent a Classics artist. And a great example of an artist that most people only know for one album (Born Under A Bad Sign) and by reputation. You could have literally picked any Albert King album for this sub and they picked a covers album. I get that the performance is fine on it, but it does a disservice to the man's art to pick a throwaway album as his representative release in this series.
The Bar-Kays is an outtake album with one great song (and not even the most renowned version of it despite appearing twice) and a bunch of filler. Once again, I could have seen the case for most of their other albums. Money Talks was a money grab from Stax and doesn't tell a story about the band other than label fanboy-ism.