TenderLovingKiller®
Well-Known Member
The OG sounds great. I picked it up for like $8.00 back in 2010.Also Cadillacs isn’t bad. The crackle goes away when the music is going and it’s a Bellman cut so it sounds pretty good.
The OG sounds great. I picked it up for like $8.00 back in 2010.Also Cadillacs isn’t bad. The crackle goes away when the music is going and it’s a Bellman cut so it sounds pretty good.
When I get that Time Machine built in the back yard, I’m gonna buy me some records.The OG sounds great. I picked it up for like $8.00 back in 2010.
I think the fallacy in this argument is pretty broad. It makes some assumptions I’m not willing to make:It is mildly baffling that someone SO INTO the production side of things doesn't have readily available, good sounding pressings.
I think the fallacy in this argument is pretty broad. It makes some assumptions I’m not willing to make:
1. Maybe a Bjork doesn't like vinyl.
2. Maybe once a joke is happy with her tapes, she’s through and could care less how the masses receive it?
3. Maybe she doesn’t like the recording process at all but recognizes it as an important step in being able to support herself and her art.
I could go on but you get the point.
Just because we are into vinyl doesn’t mean the artist is.
Or as we see eco-mixes rise in popularity from the artists, something that they care about for the enhanced sound.
There are a lot of consumers who just see vinyl as a collectible and there is no reason to think there aren’t artists that are the same.
Yup. Which is why Metallica/Furnace and Rawlings/Paramount are very interesting relationships. Hell even Jack White usually makes sure his shit is decent from his shitty press.It can also be bafflingly regional. The björk presses over here, a bit like Radiohead & Yorke, are pretty decent but the US ones have a reputation for being a hot mess. Plus record labels, rather than artists tend to have the relationship with the various pressing plants.
I think for artists like Bjork and Nick Cave, it is all about the live performance and how best to translate their vision onto the stage. I think for them, once it is on tape and mixed, it is done and they are no longer thinking about it other than in a live setting.I think the fallacy in this argument is pretty broad. It makes some assumptions I’m not willing to make:
1. Maybe a Bjork doesn't like vinyl.
2. Maybe once a joke is happy with her tapes, she’s through and could care less how the masses receive it?
3. Maybe she doesn’t like the recording process at all but recognizes it as an important step in being able to support herself and her art.
I could go on but you get the point.
Just because we are into vinyl doesn’t mean the artist is.
Or as we see eco-mixes rise in popularity from the artists, something that they care about for the enhanced sound.
There are a lot of consumers who just see vinyl as a collectible and there is no reason to think there aren’t artists that are the same.
Yeah this was a thought I had too. I couldn’t really get it down as elegantly as you did and also that post was getting a little long in the tooth.I think for artists like Bjork and Nick Cave, it is all about the live performance and how best to translate their vision onto the stage. I think for them, once it is on tape and mixed, it is done and they are no longer thinking about it other than in a live setting.
She owns her own label though, so you'd think she's at least involved in the decision making.I think the fallacy in this argument is pretty broad. It makes some assumptions I’m not willing to make:
1. Maybe a Bjork doesn't like vinyl.
2. Maybe once a joke is happy with her tapes, she’s through and could care less how the masses receive it?
3. Maybe she doesn’t like the recording process at all but recognizes it as an important step in being able to support herself and her art.
I could go on but you get the point.
Just because we are into vinyl doesn’t mean the artist is.
Or as we see eco-mixes rise in popularity from the artists, something that they care about for the enhanced sound.
There are a lot of consumers who just see vinyl as a collectible and there is no reason to think there aren’t artists that are the same.
Again, makes assumptions that owning label equates to concern regarding quality/vinylShe owns her own label though, so you'd think she's at least involved in the decision making.
Again, makes assumptions that owning label equates to concern regarding quality/vinyl
She worked at a record store, owns her own record label, frequently DJs...I don't think it's a stretch that she's at least moderately into vinyl. EIther way, this'll just go around in circles. Let's just agree that Tottenham are the greatest club and move on.Again, makes assumptions that owning label equates to concern regarding quality/vinyl
Less Pearl Jam in the world is a good thing, though.Forget what I said about the Spurs, they got Pearl Jam sick.
So any previous mention of Spurs should be read as a clear endorsement of David Robinson.
David Robinson? Don’t you mean Mookie Blaylock?Forget what I said about the Spurs, they got Pearl Jam sick.
So any previous mention of Spurs should be read as a clear endorsement of David Robinson.
Yeah and the rest of the titles for the year are leaked on jpc.Just stumbled upon these on Amazon, have these been announced elsewhere? The next two albums from the Bluesville series seem to be up for pre-order.
Albert King - Live Wire
Lightnin' Hopkins/Sonny Terry - Last Night Blues