Definitive Audiophile pressings

Also, it didn’t sound terrible to me on Qobuz either, but it was not a dedicated listen.
Folks get very upset when a digital album is loud or dynamics are squeezed, at all, not understanding what goes into making a record that isn't jazz or classical. Lol. And then as @Joe Mac astutely points out, when you go conservative on a master like this, it sounds wimpy.

It's weird. I don't know what the average audiophile is looking for, cause compression is used from the get-go in tracking. It would sound awful without it!
 
Folks get very upset when a digital album is loud or dynamics are squeezed, at all, not understanding what goes into making a record that isn't jazz or classical. Lol. And then as @Joe Mac astutely points out, when you go conservative on a master like this, it sounds wimpy.

It's weird. I don't know what the average audiophile is looking for, cause compression is used from the get-go in tracking. It would sound awful without it!
I listened to the CD this morning and have no complaints. Has deep bass, sub was working, treble was adequate, though I always EQ it up 3db on my setup. Mix seemed fine to me. Nowhere near offensive or disappointing. Didnt have some massive sound stage, but instruments sounded clear to me. Wouldn't say it was muddy.

Source is Oppo BDP-93 into Yamaha RX-V1600 via optical into DAC in the amp.
 
Folks get very upset when a digital album is loud or dynamics are squeezed, at all, not understanding what goes into making a record that isn't jazz or classical. Lol. And then as @Joe Mac astutely points out, when you go conservative on a master like this, it sounds wimpy.

It's weird. I don't know what the average audiophile is looking for, cause compression is used from the get-go in tracking. It would sound awful without it!
All the recent Cure remasters sound like mud to me. They don't need to be crystal clear but when the entire album is center channel with almost no treble or bass, that's just a shame considering the layering and sheer amount of musical intricacies that go into your average Cure song.
 
Folks get very upset when a digital album is loud or dynamics are squeezed, at all, not understanding what goes into making a record that isn't jazz or classical. Lol. And then as @Joe Mac astutely points out, when you go conservative on a master like this, it sounds wimpy.

It's weird. I don't know what the average audiophile is looking for, cause compression is used from the get-go in tracking. It would sound awful without it!

I think a lot depends on music style and a bit of compression with the likes of the cure isn’t necessarily bad and with balls out rock and roll it’s almost essential. With the more sparse singer songwriter or dense experimental music then perhaps less so. It’s also an 80s goth act, mud is kinda part of the sound to a point.
 
I think a lot depends on music style and a bit of compression with the likes of the cure isn’t necessarily bad and with balls out rock and roll it’s almost essential. With the more sparse singer songwriter or dense experimental music then perhaps less so. It’s also an 80s goth act, mud is kinda part of the sound to a point.
It's true, you'd think I'd be used to it by now. But every time I hear those trademark Cure sparkly bell sounds and they are so muffled they sound like they're coming through a pillow... it gives me the sads.

Wait.

It's the Cure. I'm supposed to be sads.

GENIUS!
 
All the recent Cure remasters sound like mud to me. They don't need to be crystal clear but when the entire album is center channel with almost no treble or bass, that's just a shame considering the layering and sheer amount of musical intricacies that go into your average Cure song.
The only newer one I've really checked out is I actually bought the picture disc (gasp, I know) of Seventeen Seconds from 2020(?), cause it's my absolute fav of theirs - obviously not a hifi production, and I was shocked at how good it sounded for the medium!
 
Back
Top