Woob_woob
Well-Known Member
If you were all about struggling artists you would stream their work on top of buying their work since that's what gets them the most money at the end of the day.Haha yeah.
I say 2 cents cause people will probably play a song more then once.
I dont even know how we even got to this point tbh just insane. Alot of the artist I listen to have went into detail about how much it steals from them/takes from them I just dont understand why so many people after seeing that still think its great to go take bread from some musicians kids.
I feel it was the big corps way of trying to find middle ground for piracy or something.
If a child draws bugs bunny or some cartoon should the child be forced to pay some kind of fee or perhaps charged with some kinda crime?
If art is used/reused in a non commercial way then its fine. It only becomes theft if you make money of someone elses work.
Should still be credited tho whever possible so the non commerical music can still act as a promotional tool for all artist involved.
Im not a girl scout so when I talk about all this streaming stuff I am mostly only thinking off underground artist who can barely afford to eat without music and use music as way to try make a living.
Like I said earlier I give no shits about rihanna or [insert generic mainstream artist here] makes another million.
All about the struggling/independent artist.
Also independent artists make more per stream than artists signed to a major label. The guy behind Carseat Headrest claims he was making 30k a year from streams before he got famous because he wasnt on a label/didnt have to share any of the streaming money with anyone