Bull Shannon
Well-Known Member
While personally I don't believe the worth of a movie should be measured by how much it makes, Furiosa's performance at the box office doesn't spell good things for the prospects of Miller returning for another Mad Max installment. I'm thinking the marketing may have done a disservice to this movie, as a lot of the trailers and ads made it seem like it would be another high-octane nonstop thrill ride like Fury Road, when in reality it's a slower, more contemplative character study. I thought it was great to see Miller explore even more of the world he's created with this franchise, but I think a lot of audiences might come away disappointed it doesn't provide that shot of adrenaline that Fury Road did (even though, in my opinion, there's some action scenes in this that rival the finest of that movie).
It's also been extremely disheartening to see the two most common reactions to it underperforming have been "who asked for this?" and "I'll just wait for it to come to streaming." I'm not the type of person that likes to go around complaining about and looking down on the "general audience" - it usually feels really elitist and snobby to me - but I look at comments like this and can't help but feel like we've really lost the plot at some point.
It's weird: I feel more optimistic about movies and moviegoing than I have in a while. Remember Dune II was pretty huge. And remember Furiosa is a rated-R, offbeat action movie; as much as Fury Road paved the way (ha ha) for Furiosa, the audience is narrow. The high-profile, big-budget releases are getting attention for their inability to pull in profits, but midsize and low-budget features released by entities such as A24 and Neon are doing better than ever.I think we're witnessing the beginning of the end of the modern movie going experience. People say they want practical effects, stunts, and less CGI yet they won't support movies like Furiosa and The Fall Guy that give you exactly that. Yes, I understand both had CGI but they also tried to give people old time movie thrills with the assistance of CGI versus straight up green screen shitfests. I think it's hard to pinpoint exactly what's wrong. We just came off two summers of Top Gun Maverick and Barbie/Oppenheimer blowing out the box office. People went to event movies. Yeah, it's expensive to go to a movie. Yeah you can just wait until it comes out on streaming in less than 60 days. But at some point, we're just going to get CGI and AI shitfests on streaming services because it is no longer feasible to make movies for the theaters.
I'd like to posit we're already past a certain breaking point, and what we're seeing now is the experience/industry settling into a new mode. 5-10 years ago I'd say the problem is studios keep engineering four-quadrant blockbusters which appease everyone but please no one, out of hopes of recouping a $150-200 budget. Covid closures and superhero fatigue basically demolished this model. While streaming services have been eating the mid and low budget market's lunch by scooping up movies and dumping them on their services, they're starting to come around to the fact that a theatrical release window is money on the table.
I'm noticing the indie and foreign market picking up somewhat, reflected both in box office and awards success; I think we're moving away from the movies being a family outing where you sink $100 into tickets and concessions, but individuals or small groups seeing smaller, more specifically-targeted movies is on the rise. Cineplexes are becoming untenable to run, but smaller screens where curated selections and thoughtful snacks are able to draw in loyal movie freaks.
eta: I wonder how much Barbenheimer is indicative of "narrower" (as narrowly aimed as two mainstream corporate blockbusters could be) films winning out; these movies were highly anticipated more for the artists making them than the spectacle being put before us, and they ostensibly fit into convenient demographic categories. For the first time in a while an opening weekend wasn't about the movie opening vs. the alternatives riding its wake, there was an "equal" choice put before us: see one, the other, or see 'em both. People went to Barbie dressed up in pink as a personal expression, and not just for the Thursday night previews. Earlier today on his insta story Hanif Abdurriqib mentioned enjoying writing about live music more than recorded music because the act of witnessing was an important part of the experience; I think moviegoing will always have that appeal to a certain set, and I have some optimism that not only will there always be a market for that, the market will recognize and lean into how witnessing communally is why we go to the movies rather than stay home.
Last edited: