Yeah, this sounds good to me: have the person who picks the record run the guess thread for the following month.I'll be happy to run the next guess thread
Shouldn't the person who picked the selection run the guess thread?Yeah, this sounds good to me: have the person who picks the record run the guess thread for the following month.
Shouldn't the person who picked the selection run the guess thread?
Most of us feel it's weird and less fun to have the picker to run the guess thread, because when you run the guess thread you have to take decisions to retain or not some guesses based on the clues, and sometimes the fun in clues is the misdirection a bit.
I get that but it also setups a situation where the picker is really dissatisfied with how it is run
I get that but it also setups a situation where the picker is really dissatisfied with how it is run
How so ? They can still interact in th thread to right a wrong if they wish to say so ?
Would you want the picker to come on the thread and say this is a better clue (or whatevr) if you are running the guess thread? I get it is for fun, but there will be people who take it seriously, I mean look how the VMP guess threads went. I imagine it wouldn't happen at first but over time I can see it potentially becoming an issue
This is just my opinion and I am not saying we have to change the already setup idea, just something to think about
ah, my bad, I seeI think we are in a misunderstanding there. The picker would be basically "Storf" and drop clues, the guess thread runner would compile guesses, do a bit of sleuthing, keeping the thread alive, triaging guesses, etc. Same as "before", but with our own curation. Does that make more sense ?
Who's your league? My wife used to skate for Glasgow. Was never charter level, but was a pretty good blocker.I was out of a connection for the week end refereeing roller derby, list updated.
Who's your league? My wife used to skate for Glasgow. Was never charter level, but was a pretty good blocker.
Nantes! Bunch of my pals were at that tournament! They had a great time.Nantes Derby Girls, we had Glasgow B Team at a home tournament once !
I was going to suggest something like this. Gives us time to digest and chat about it before the next guesses commence.Another suggestion. I know I am revealing AotM's name on 31st but we should give more time between the announcement and the next Guess thread. It would give a few days for members to discuss about the pick, ask questions to the picker, etc... Vol.0 is a test run and we only had 15 days so I suppose it's ok but in the future, I think we should have, let's say, a five days window between the announcement and the next thread.
Another suggestion. I know I am revealing AotM's name on 31st but we should give more time between the announcement and the next Guess thread. It would give a few days for members to discuss about the pick, ask questions to the picker, etc... Vol.0 is a test run and we only had 15 days so I suppose it's ok but in the future, I think we should have, let's say, a five days window between the announcement and the next thread.
I agree. I think the most important part of this club-type-of-thing we are trying out here should be the music discussion. I say we should give it at least a week for discussion until we start the next guess thread, then both threads (discussion of the current ROTM and Guess of the upcoming one) can coexist.I was going to suggest something like this. Gives us time to digest and chat about it before the next guesses commence.
I agree. I think the most important part of this club-type-of-thing we are trying out here should be the music discussion. I say we should give it at least a week for discussion until we start the next guess thread, then both threads (discussion of the current ROTM and Guess of the upcoming one) can coexist.
Or we could change the guess thread into the ROTM thread like we did on the forbidden forumAnother suggestion. I know I am revealing AotM's name on 31st but we should give more time between the announcement and the next Guess thread. It would give a few days for members to discuss about the pick, ask questions to the picker, etc... Vol.0 is a test run and we only had 15 days so I suppose it's ok but in the future, I think we should have, let's say, a five days window between the announcement and the next thread.
Announcement on day 25 of each month then (20 on February)?