Political Discussion

Just some bros doin’ bro things…
IMG_3627.jpeg
First off, JD Vance looks like a 12 year-old in his short pants and tucked-in polo. Secondly, DJT “TRUMP WAS RIGHT ABOUT EVERYTHING” hat has people asking a lot of questions already answered by his hat.
 
Well It looks like the house speakership is going multiple rounds. Republicans seemingly can't govern but the America people keep voting for this shit.
 
epyon415 said:
Yeah, but we have Xfinity…equally as shitty.
Click to expand...
Correct and that is why I am glad I live in Washington State, we have a Net Neutrality Laws on the books at the state level protecting us from threat of throttling posed by the appellate courts tossing out Net Neutrality on the federal level. I am pretty sure Oregon and California have their own Net Neutrality laws also.
 
The courts logic for throwing it out is insane too. The FCC is the obvious agency who would regulate Internet/Broadband but the courts found congress never explicitly gave them that power. The FCC has the power to regulate telecommunications and calling internet/broadband telecommunications is a gray area and therefore the regulations should not stand.

This continues the trend of ruling back regulations and not allowing the agencies to do their things. Only what was explicitly authorized by congress stands.
 
RenegadeMonster said:
The courts logic for throwing it out is insane too. The FCC is the obvious agency who would regulate Internet/Broadband but the courts found congress never explicitly gave them that power. The FCC has the power to regulate telecommunications and calling internet/broadband telecommunications is a gray area and therefore the regulations should not stand.

This continues the trend of ruling back regulations and not allowing the agencies to do their things. Only what was explicitly authorized by congress stands.
Click to expand...
This is the result of the Supreme Court knocking down Chevron Difference last year. Laws were written in broad terms knowing that expert agencies like the FCC could then hone and fine tune them but since Chevron, now that same broad language that’s on the books will be used to toss out pretty much any ruling that a bunch of non-experts in Congress didn’t explicitly define when passing laws.

This was just the first of many horrible repercussions that ending Chevron Difference is gonna cause.
 
TenderLovingKiller® said:
This is the result of the Supreme Court knocking down Chevron Difference last year. Laws were written in broad terms knowing that expert agencies like the FCC could then hone and fine tune them but since Chevron, now that same broad language that’s on the books will be used to toss out pretty much any ruling that a bunch of non-experts in Congress didn’t explicitly define when passing laws.

This was just the first of many horrible repercussions that ending Chevron Difference is gonna cause.
Click to expand...

Do you not have powers delegated to ministers under primary legislation who have then have ability to sign off on secondary legislation that is a bit more specialist and specific?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top