dhodo
Well-Known Member
Winning what in court though? Still waiting for some evidence.
Political Discussion
- Thread starter David A.
- Start date
Mather
Unknown Member
They won't win anything in court. They have no evidence, and no matter what way a judge leans, they still require evidence. All they're doing is muddying the waters and sowing confusion and non confidence in the process. They know this is going no where. It's just all being done so that is easier down the line to pull this shit again and have it actually work.
wokeupnew
Well-Known Member
Yeah as much as I like to err on the side of caution I just don’t see how they’d get away with removing votes or disenfranchising millions of voters who voted by Mail. There’s still no evidence and public officials say there’s no evidence.
this has no legs at all.
No Evidence of Systematic Fraud in U.S. Elections, International Observer Mission Reports - WSJ.com
A team of international observers invited by the Trump administration has issued a [preliminary report](https://s.wsj.net/public/resources/documents/PreliminaryReportoftheOASEOMUSA2020.pdf) giving high marks to the conduct of last week’s elections--and it criticizes President Trump for making basele
www.wsj.com
Tys1
Well-Known Member
I want nothing more than for you to be right. And I’m really hoping it’s my internal pessimism that is speaking louder than my observations of this stupid inverted turtle getting away with so much already. They’ll find (read: plant) “evidence” and then they’ll have the pawns in place. I really hope I’m wrong.
TenderLovingKiller®
Well-Known Member
You can just take a step and look around. The non-political junkies the people who barely pay attention to any of this they have all accepted Biden won the election and now is President-Elect. Biden is playing the part. Trump hasn’t done anything remotely Presidential in over a week. This is a fait accompli. Everyone knows The Trump camp is gonna run out of options eventually, of course they are gonna kick and scream for as long as they can. None of this will change anything. Biden is the President-Elect and at Noon on January 20, 2021 he’ll be sworn in as the 46th President of the United States.
TenderLovingKiller®
Well-Known Member
The problem with this is they are gonna have a really muddled message. The election is invalid due to fraud but vote for us as a check on President Biden. If the election is invalid then the GOP already has the majority and if they are gonna check Biden, well then he must be President. The mental knots they are gonna tie is gonna be ridiculous and Ossoff and Warnock are just gonna keep talking about $15 minimum wage an healthcare.
LiamGallaghersBucketHat
Go on, geezer.
It’s still amazes me how easily people are being brainwashed by this news channel. It’s almost as if people were more educated, theses idiots would be out of work....
Also I’d like to punch each one of them in the throat
Also I’d like to punch each one of them in the throat
dhodo
Well-Known Member
Turbo
Well-Known Member
These guys are available if ever he's in the UK:
R G Marriott | Heating | Leicester
For reliable plumbing, heating and electrical work in the Leicester area, call R G Marriott on 01476 860265 today!
bettim84
Well-Known Member
No. SCOTUS is almost never the court of first instance. It would have to be an appeal from a state’s highest court OR federal court of appeals. I’m with the others in this thread who think there is no legal avenue to contest this election. All Trump is really doing is trying to win over the “court of public opinion,” i.e. deplorables.
About the Supreme Court
The Court's Jurisdiction
Article III, Section II of the Constitution establishes the jurisdiction (legal ability to hear a case) of the Supreme Court. The Court has original jurisdiction (a case is tried before the Court) over certain cases, e.g., suits between two or more states and/or cases involving ambassadors and other public ministers.
The Court has appellate jurisdiction (the Court can hear the case on appeal) on almost any other case that involves a point of constitutional and/or federal law. Some examples include cases to which the United States is a party, cases involving Treaties, and cases involving ships on the high seas and navigable waterways (admiralty cases).
LiamGallaghersBucketHat
Go on, geezer.
“They Lost Them All” 
Things are looking bad for public transportations future in MA.
The MBTA is about to have mass layoffs.
Subway frequency is going to be reduced by 45%, the Green Line E branch is going to be Truncated at Brigham Circle.
In other words, this means it will no longer service Brookline. Maintaining service only to Boston.
25 Bus roots are being eliminated and frequencies are also being cut.
There will be no commuter ferry service in 2021 or weekend commuter rail service. Commuter rail will also have reduced frequencies on some lines and all lines service will be cut at 9pm for weekday service.
The part that really worries me is the MBTA considers all these cuts to be "Permanent". Meaning that these services will not be restored unless they both have the money and ridership in the future.
A Bailout package for public transportation will be needed in addition to ridership returning to get things back where they were.
The MBTA is about to have mass layoffs.
Subway frequency is going to be reduced by 45%, the Green Line E branch is going to be Truncated at Brigham Circle.
In other words, this means it will no longer service Brookline. Maintaining service only to Boston.
25 Bus roots are being eliminated and frequencies are also being cut.
There will be no commuter ferry service in 2021 or weekend commuter rail service. Commuter rail will also have reduced frequencies on some lines and all lines service will be cut at 9pm for weekday service.
The part that really worries me is the MBTA considers all these cuts to be "Permanent". Meaning that these services will not be restored unless they both have the money and ridership in the future.
A Bailout package for public transportation will be needed in addition to ridership returning to get things back where they were.
Analysis: Why the Senate is so tough for Democrats
The expected twin Georgia runoff elections in January that will determine control of the Senate encapsulate the structural challenge facing Democrats as they battle to secure a majority in the chamber that could determine the shape of Joe Biden's presidency.
www.cnn.com
Basically, my takeaway is we are more divided than ever. While the democrats the popular vote republicans always win in the number of states that vote for them.
This means that the Republican party is now always primed to have the advantage to control the senate. Red states are almost ensured to vote GOP when it comes to the senate. Any state that went to Trump will go to the GOP in a senate race. The only flipped seats were the in states that Biden won.
This worries me. This could lean to the GOP being able to obstruct any policies and court nominations for the foreseeable future.
dbarila
Well-Known Member
The downside is his lunatic followers who take everything he says seriously. How is Joe Biden even going to have a chance to unite the parties if a whole demographic thinks he's not even a legitimate President? (I realize many didn't feel like Trump was legitmste but he didn't even pretend like he wanted to unite the country)
Dtknuckles
Well-Known Member
“They Lost Them All”
Even if they did send out ballots to dead people or people who don’t live in the district any longer, the only way that matters is if they were returned and counted.