Mather
Unknown Member
The Onion, even satirical headlines are totally plausible now.Is it really The Onion if it’s TRUE?
View attachment 74041
The Onion, even satirical headlines are totally plausible now.Is it really The Onion if it’s TRUE?
View attachment 74041
Imagine the state of the Republican party in 2024 if Trump is still their best hope.4 years is a long time. Once he is a former President he’s can still hold events and watch news and tweet. My guess is he becomes quite content with his post Presidential life. Though I think he will tease out the possibility of running again for the rest of his life because it will capture attention as long as it is a possibility.
This is a solid guess as well. Could definitely see it going this way if he decides actually being President isn't really worth it.4 years is a long time. Once he is a former President he can still hold events and watch news and tweet. My guess is he becomes quite content with his post Presidential life. Though I think he will tease out the possibility of running again for the rest of his life because it will capture attention as long as it is a possibility.
Fauci can’t be fired very easily if at all (without misconduct or some other legitimate reason).Mark Esper was someone who Trump's advisors told him to wait until after the election. Then he could have his way and fire him.
I'm really scared for Dr. Fauci now.
-they're delusional.
-there are no fake ballots. the "fake ballots" are mail in/provisional/absentee ballots. they are not fake, they are legitimate ballots and they count. No one in local state governments are saying there are fake ballots. All of Trump's attempts to undermine the election are failing instantly from courts.
-you do not need to worry.
No problemI would like to say thank you for the reassurance. Yesterday during my meal break at work, I overheard a coworker say things to another coworker like "they found MASSIVE voter fraud" and couldn't help but think that he got his news from conspiracy outlets. Baseless claims, as far as I'm concerned. I'm not seeing any proof of so-called "voter fraud" with a quick Google search.
His words were jarring for two minutes after he spouted that nonsense, though (also lost my appetite afterwards ).
Not sure if 45 has the ability to fire Fauci. If so, then no worries, Biden would just bring him back.Mark Esper was someone who Drumpf's advisors told him to wait until after the election. Then he could have his way and fire him.
I'm really scared for Dr. Fauci now.
No, he can't really. So no concern there.Not sure if 45 has the ability to fire Fauci. If so, then no worries, Biden would just bring him back.
speaking of, I was full on doom scrolling after the AP headline about Barr.
tl;dr - he is saying the DOJ will investigate any irregularities they could find. Twitter was (and probably rightly, a little bit) freaking out about it being a Coup.
Literally zero. Zero. No evidence at all about Fraud is being found. Unless there’s some kind of planted evidence nothing will happen. Anytime there’s been any kind of “evidence” like the laptop, the video of ballots burning on printer paper, it’s been swiftly denied and shut down.
It’s all just stroking fears.
Follow up. It’s only meant to stroke fear and erode confidence. They have nothing!
January 20th can’t get here faster.
So Barr seems to be again taking the DOJ on a new, dangerous, path that is contrary to their policies.
So Barr seems to be again taking the DOJ on a new, dangerous, path that is contrary to their policies.
I think Barr doesn’t want to get fired so he basically is putting out this “investigation” to appease Trump. Nothing will actually come of it. He might be a puppet but much the DA are not. Nothing will come of it but it sounds serious.If I were playing devils advocate...
My big takeaways from that last highlighted bit are
1.
the word OVERT implies that the DOJ can partake in investigations, they just shouldn’t do it in the public’s eye
2. The word should means something very different than shall
If I were playing devils advocate...
My big takeaways from that last highlighted bit are
1.
the word OVERT implies that the DOJ can partake in such actions, they just shouldn’t do it in the public’s eye
2. The word should means something very different than shall
They don't need a person from Biden. Trump can pardon them himself, and likely will. He'll also likely attempt to pardon himself for everything he's ever done.Why doesn’t Trump and co. try to get a pardon from Biden? If this all can go away for him, would he do it? If he can just fuck off for the rest of his life and we never have to listen to him again. Even though justice would not be served, that’s not a bad trade right now.
Why doesn’t Trump and co. try to get a pardon from Biden? If this all can go away for him, would he do it? If he can just fuck off for the rest of his life and we never have to listen to him again. Even though justice would not be served, that’s not a bad trade right now.