Political Discussion

Fox news is saying that more police officers have been killed in the line of duty under Biden's first year as president than any other year under any other president. This news story has some people I know who are in law enforcement / military riled up and they are resharing the story.

So of course, Biden is to blame and #DefundThePolice.

Conservatives are likely to push "tough on crime" in upcoming election. And blame biden and democrats for lawlessness.
 
Anyone remember the Equifax data breach back in 2017?

Yeah, that was 5 years ago.

We are in February of 2022 now when the free credit monitoring for 4 years.

What kind of protection is that for consumers if it takes them 5 years to get free credit monitoring after a major data breach? The crooks have already had are information for 5 years! 5 YEARS!

To make this matter worse, this wasn't something Equifax provided people out of the goodness of their hearts. This was court ordered after a class action lawsuit. The court order came down in July 2019, so it's really only been a 2 1/2 years wait for credit monitoring from the time of the court order. But still, it's been 5 years from the breach.

All that goes to show is it's completely up to you to be on top of things. There is no real motivation or urgency to make it right and protect consumers. Probably all this amounted to was a good payday for the law firm that filed the class action lawsuit.
 
A note to the protestors occupying my town: you've been heard, now go home. You pissed and shat all over our streets, you've stolen food from the homeless shelter, you desecrated the monument to Terry Fox, you vandalized the tomb of the unknown soldier and the War memorial, you painted enough swastikas, you terrorize local residents that have done nothing to you, including harassing and smearing shit on the house of a gay couple, you have caused the closure of numerous small businesses and restaurants that are struggling to make ends meet because you insist on blowing maskless in their faces, you fly confederate flags for whatever the fuck reason you think that has to do with Canada and you are preventing normal citizens from getting to work. And you say you fight for "freedom"? Who's? You've had your 15 minutes. Enough.


Is this still going on @Turbo

Also, according to this article from slate, protesters are getting most of their funding from crowdfunding within the united states.
 

Is this still going on @Turbo

Also, according to this article from slate, protesters are getting most of their funding from crowdfunding within the united states.

Yes it’s still going on, unfortunately. Let me come back and expand a bit in an hour or so.

EDIT:

The protestors had accumulated almost C$10 million on GoFundMe, but GoFundMe decided they wouldn't pay out and would reimburse the donors. They stated that it was against their policy to fund an occupation (they were ok with funding a protest, but this is not a protest any more). Now funding is going through some sort of US based socio-financing site with Christian ties. It will be interesting to see if they can even collect that because the government could easily freeze bank accounts depending on how the occupiers are classified (I'm not going to mince words: I think they meet the definition of terrorists at this point).

There are a lot of moving parts. Police is finally taking a tougher stand and got reinforced. They dismantled camps, confiscated illegal impromptu gas and propane sites and are making gas resupplying illegal.

Another moving part is that the citizens and closed businesses in downtown Ottawa have launched a lawsuit to recover damages. They're going after more than $10M, which, as mentioned above the protestors have apparently collected. They also just won an injunction making it illegal to honk horns in downtown Ottawa for the next 10 days, so this gives police another tool to make arrests.

Anyway, I don't think anyone had any problems with a protest. We get them all the time for all kinds of reasons. But this is an occupation now, and a whole other thing. I hope it ends soon and well enough. Personally, it's just my travel choices that are disturbed. I can't really go across the bridges to Ottawa without a massive time investment (so I avoided so far). It's nothing like what those living in downtown Ottawa have had to suffer.
 
Last edited:
Anyone remember the Equifax data breach back in 2017?

Yeah, that was 5 years ago.

We are in February of 2022 now when the free credit monitoring for 4 years.

What kind of protection is that for consumers if it takes them 5 years to get free credit monitoring after a major data breach? The crooks have already had are information for 5 years! 5 YEARS!

To make this matter worse, this wasn't something Equifax provided people out of the goodness of their hearts. This was court ordered after a class action lawsuit. The court order came down in July 2019, so it's really only been a 2 1/2 years wait for credit monitoring from the time of the court order. But still, it's been 5 years from the breach.

All that goes to show is it's completely up to you to be on top of things. There is no real motivation or urgency to make it right and protect consumers. Probably all this amounted to was a good payday for the law firm that filed the class action lawsuit.
What you need to do is have the government have a data breach, like the Office of Personnel Management did a few years back. Free credit and identity theft monitoring for life!!!

Now that's some world class fuckery....to make me feel thankful for what they did for me after THEIR breach. I'm a lost cause. Don't look at me! DON'T LOOK AT MEEEEEE!!!!
 

Not only did Dejoy slow down our mail delivery, he's pretty much ensuring that the USPS will say with gas vehicles for the next 30 to 40 years citing that electric vehicles are too expensive.

The USPS current fleet is 40 years old, maybe not all vehicles, but the design of them are. The new replacement fleet will likely be around for an additional 30 to 40 years. Meaning that today's choice to stick with gas could lock in the USPS with a gas engine fleet for just as long.

It's no surprise that the gas vehicle option was the cheapest, and that Dejoy went with it because it was the cheapest. But he is being blasted over this decision including by the Biden administration that said this decision directly contradicts our country's climate goals.

I bet Dejoy doesn't give two craps about our climate goals though.

Why haven't we gotten rid of this guy yet?
 
I think Ohio is the only state where the courts will rulings against gerrymandering will stand because it's a violation of Ohio's State Constitution.


If the challenge is against the voting rights act, odds are the new districting is here to stay.

In a 5:4 vote the SCOTUS freezing a lower courts decision against Alabama's redistricting which means it will be fully in place for the next election cycle.

The actual ruling may come next term if the SCOTUS decides to take the case on. And if they do it could further undermine the voting rights act. But even more dangerous, they may never actually hear the case.

Justice Brett Kavanaugh stated that this decision leaves the status quo in place and the court is not in the place of rewriting law.

"Today's decision is one more in a disconcertingly long line of cases in which this Court uses its shadow docket to signal or make changes in the law, without anything approaching full briefing and argument"

The above statement sounds dangerous and really scary. It was not something that was on my radar until now.

I don't like the sounds of this whole shadow docket thing that today's conservative court loves to use.
 
Wow, I'm fascinated by the fact that I might see something in my lifetime I never thought would happen.

There is a possibility that the constitution will be amended and we will have a 38th amendment. With how divided we are as a nation, I never thought I would see this happen with the requirements of getting it through congress and 38 states ratifying it.

But here we are. The Equal Rights Act of 1972 may now have reached the ratification of the 38 states needed to amend the constitution.

This of course is being highly contested by the GOP.

When the Equal Rights Act was first passed states were given 7 years to ratify it. And of course it fell short of the 38 states need to ratify it. The deadline was extended to 1982 where we saw the number of states who ratified it increase to 35. However, 5 states rescinded their ratification. In recent years, Virginia, Illinois and Nevada approved the ERA, with Virginia claiming to be the 38th in 2020.

The issue we have now is whether the ratification was valid.

Republicans say the 3 recent ratifications are invalid because they came after the deadline and 5 states rescinded. Therefor the Equal Rights Act does not have 38 Ratifications, it only had 30 when it's deadline passed.

Advocates for the Equal Rights Act say that the constitution does not grant states the power to rescind their ratification and the Equal Rights Act included no deadline in it's actual language. The deadline was more of a we would like to get this back from you by rather than legally binding.

The National Archivist is expected to update the Constitution by April before stepping down and being replaced by an acting archivist.

However, Republicans sent him a letter dated February 8th asking the National Archivist for his reassurance that he would not amend the constitution "until it has been properly ratified and legal questions regarding such ratification have been resolved."

The Equal Rights Act is already law. Why would Republicans oppose it being added as an amendment to the constitution? Is it because it makes it that much harder for them to overturn or look the other way in court cases?

Also, if the amendment is made to the constitution, expect it to be challenged and head to the SCOTUS. Where anything goes there. They could make up reasons as to why the ratification didn't legally happen or agree with the republicans points that 3 states ratifications are invalid and 5 states rescinded. Even though legally, there is no language whatsoever that addresses rescinding a ratification or that it is even an option.
 
Wow, I'm fascinated by the fact that I might see something in my lifetime I never thought would happen.

There is a possibility that the constitution will be amended and we will have a 38th amendment. With how divided we are as a nation, I never thought I would see this happen with the requirements of getting it through congress and 38 states ratifying it.

But here we are. The Equal Rights Act of 1972 may now have reached the ratification of the 38 states needed to amend the constitution.

This of course is being highly contested by the GOP.

When the Equal Rights Act was first passed states were given 7 years to ratify it. And of course it fell short of the 38 states need to ratify it. The deadline was extended to 1982 where we saw the number of states who ratified it increase to 35. However, 5 states rescinded their ratification. In recent years, Virginia, Illinois and Nevada approved the ERA, with Virginia claiming to be the 38th in 2020.

The issue we have now is whether the ratification was valid.

Republicans say the 3 recent ratifications are invalid because they came after the deadline and 5 states rescinded. Therefor the Equal Rights Act does not have 38 Ratifications, it only had 30 when it's deadline passed.

Advocates for the Equal Rights Act say that the constitution does not grant states the power to rescind their ratification and the Equal Rights Act included no deadline in it's actual language. The deadline was more of a we would like to get this back from you by rather than legally binding.

The National Archivist is expected to update the Constitution by April before stepping down and being replaced by an acting archivist.

However, Republicans sent him a letter dated February 8th asking the National Archivist for his reassurance that he would not amend the constitution "until it has been properly ratified and legal questions regarding such ratification have been resolved."

The Equal Rights Act is already law. Why would Republicans oppose it being added as an amendment to the constitution? Is it because it makes it that much harder for them to overturn or look the other way in court cases?

Also, if the amendment is made to the constitution, expect it to be challenged and head to the SCOTUS. Where anything goes there. They could make up reasons as to why the ratification didn't legally happen or agree with the republicans points that 3 states ratifications are invalid and 5 states rescinded. Even though legally, there is no language whatsoever that addresses rescinding a ratification or that it is even an option.
surprising exactly no-one,

1644532439220.png

 

The housing market is just insane right now and home ownership is becoming less and less likely for the younger generations.

Inventory of homes on the market are way down, prices are way up and the middle class is being priced out. The majority of home sales in today's market it's not all that uncommon for inspections to be waived, all cash offers be given and bidding wars that result in homes selling above the listing price.

The middle class, especially first time home buyers who have not built up equity in previous home ownership are being completely priced out of being able to purchase a home in many areas.

The feds increasing the interest rates only further worsens the problem. House prices are not going to come down due to higher interest rates of the people buying are buying with all cash offers.

The Covid-19 housing market has also seen prices of houses in the suburbs and country skyrocket as people leave the cities now that they can work remotely

For example, look at this insanity!

1644610191330.png



This house was listed 325k at the end of 2020. Today it's listed at a little over 1.2M.

And according to the person who shared this listing looking to buy a home in PA, this property is not the only one which has seen a 4x increase over the last year. Several of listings in the surrounding area show the same thing! For example, I just found this one in less than 15 seconds. 596 Old Ash Rd, Volant, PA 16156 | MLS #1528313 | Zillow

1644610535134.png



Tight housing inventory has also lead to a spike in something called "Quiet Title" cases.

Quiet title laws are very common in the Midwest. Quiet title laws basically allow people to make a claim to a property if they show interest in said property.

However, the language is very vague and what an interest is is not defined.

In the example listed in the article below, a prominent property owner in the area tool possession of a house under quiet title law and listed it on Zillow for sale. Her interest in the house was she said it was abandoned and that she had a tax sale certificate for the house.

Only the house was not abandoned and she did not have a tax sale certificate, rather only applied for one and was rejected.

But won the property in court by default because the property owners were unaware of the court date and did not show.

People are at a severe disadvantage when it comes to quiet title. Most people don't know about it or how to navigate the system when it becomes an issue. People who don't speak english are at a much larger disadvantage and it is feared quiet title disputes prey on them.

When it comes to the court dates. The person trying to take the property needs to notify the owner. However, law allows them to just say they couldn't get in touch with the owner they are in dispute with and just post a legal notice in a local paper. An English paper that people who don't speak english wouldn't be subscribed too. Not to mention newspaper subscriptions are way way down since the time the law was passed.

In the case of the article below, the homeowner lived in the house in the summer and in California in the winter and was not around to see the notice that was only posted in a local newspaper.

Her daugher looking to buy a home saw the listing for her mother's house on Zillow and asked her about why she didn't tell her it was for sale, she would buy it from her. The mother of course was like, what do you mean? The house isn't for sale.

Luckily they were able to get this sorted. But for many people they find themselves without a home.


To make matters worse, records are not kept for how many homes change ownership through quiet title. They only can count those where the clerk made note of it and even that is now required by law.

The lady who took the house in the story above took at least 18 properties though quiet title in the area over the last few years that they can find on record.

The advice given to owners to protect themselves from quiet title action is to get title insurance. But wouldn't that mean you just get compensated after losing your house?
 
The advice given to owners to protect themselves from quiet title action is to get title insurance. But wouldn't that mean you just get compensated after losing your house?
From my understanding when I bought my house and, thus, title insurance is that it protects the lender and homeowner if any legal questions regarding the title arise after the sale. It is meant to cover legal fees. I was understanding that it meant oversights in title during the process of closing. That is, a person claims they should have had an interest/claim in the property in the past and it shouldn't have been sold without their consent. It would be weird that these quiet title claims have any traction if it's meant to say the claim is made after someone secures a new title.
 
From my understanding when I bought my house and, thus, title insurance is that it protects the lender and homeowner if any legal questions regarding the title arise after the sale. It is meant to cover legal fees. I was understanding that it meant oversights in title during the process of closing. That is, a person claims they should have had an interest/claim in the property in the past and it shouldn't have been sold without their consent. It would be weird that these quiet title claims have any traction if it's meant to say the claim is made after someone secures a new title.

I think you may be right. I miss understood what people meant by the importance of having title insurance.

It covers your legal fees when quiet title action is taken against you. You are still SOL if you lose your house by default not knowing that a quiet title dispute is happening and you miss your court date.
 
Canada:

Where people protesting for environmental protection have their cars and belongings confiscated by police and given to the logging company, are assaulted and have their guitars smashed...

Where people protesting for Indigenous rights are brutally assaulted by an excessively militarized and historically racist police force who also arrest the media to keep people from seeing what really goes on...

Where "freedom convoy" idiots get... flyers?!

FLW0vYdXEAsOPGe.jpeg
 
Over the last week my father has been sending me articles about massive democratic voter fraud found in PA and GA.

To the extent of only 20% of the votes in PA are actually valid. An audit found that far more mail in ballots were returned than sent out.

Georgia had voting machine fraud that incorrect counted votes for republicans as votes for democrats.

I'm just shaking my head and telling him you know that's all disinformation and any legitimate audit found no evident of any fraud. Also another audit that says Georgia had over 30,000 people still on the voter rolls who were deceased or moved to another state. Bud said nothing about if any of those people actually casted a vote in Georgia...

He responded by just telling me to "stop watching CNN".
 
Last edited:
No knock search warrants really need to go. There is no place for them.

I have heard them mentioned several times in the last couple years in relation of police related shootings and deaths of innocent people not listed on the warrant.

Police use them to prevent people from having the time to flush evidence down the toilet. But they also seem to always do them in the middle of the night while people are asleep.

The latest one was a couple weeks back in Minneapolis.

Police stormed into a house in the middle of the night. A black man not listed on the search warrant nor had any criminal record was asleep on the couch in the living room. He was jolted awake by what he could only assume was a home invasion and reached for his gun that was nearby. Police opened fire shooting him multiple times and killing him.

Police are supposed to announce themselves as police as soon as they enter a home. The police said they did this, but body camera footage shows they didn't until about 6 seconds after entry. Just before they opened fire.

The Police Chief has already made a statement that the police shooting was "justified" and the DA doesn't look like they are going to press charges against the police.

What do you expect when you wake people up in the middle of the night by surprise. They are not going to think straight and it's going to be all flight or fight response until they have a moment to collect themselves. Not to mention, their right to self defense is gone if it's police entering their home.

The person listed on the search warrant of course was not there, nor was any evidence found.

I didn't hear what the search warrant was for, but one can only assume it was drug related.
 
I didn't hear what the search warrant was for, but one can only assume it was drug related.
That's half the problem. The other half is the lack of training and the overall militarization of the police. The essence of a no knock warrant is within reason for real actual crimes being policed by highly trained actual police.
 
Explain to me how this is the fault of young adults?

NBC Boston had a news story this morning about how the average price of rent across the country went up by 19 point something percent from December 2020 through December 2021. And the story watch bait was "young adults could be to blame".

When the story actually aired, these were the 3 reasons they gave as to why rent is up.

  • Housing demand is up.
  • There is a housing shortage
  • More young adults are choosing to rent rather than own

Me and my sister just were like yeah ok. How is that by choice. Young adults are being priced out of the housing market and can't afford to compete in bidding wars. Especially if they are looking to be first time home owners.
 
Explain to me how this is the fault of young adults?

NBC Boston had a news story this morning about how the average price of rent across the country went up by 19 point something percent from December 2020 through December 2021. And the story watch bait was "young adults could be to blame".

When the story actually aired, these were the 3 reasons they gave as to why rent is up.

  • Housing demand is up.
  • There is a housing shortage
  • More young adults are choosing to rent rather than own

Me and my sister just were like yeah ok. How is that by choice. Young adults are being priced out of the housing market and can't afford to compete in bidding wars. Especially if they are looking to be first time home owners.
Millennials: the face of the economy the boomers gutted. It’s been nearly fifteen years or so of this narrative. Such is our lot in life.
 
Back
Top