Political Discussion

My question for the police in this nonsense: “was anyone charged with a crime?” Cause if not, I think their argument is complete BS.
 
Musk is in Cleveland today as per his private jet tracker. Cleveland Cliffs is trying to acquire US Steel, whose stock ticker is X.

What are the chances Musk is taking the time to get involved in the acquisition process for the sole purpose of getting the X stock ticker?
 
Musk is in Cleveland today as per his private jet tracker. Cleveland Cliffs is trying to acquire US Steel, whose stock ticker is X.

What are the chances Musk is taking the time to get involved in the acquisition process for the sole purpose of getting the X stock ticker?
100%. He's completely unhinged when it comes to this stupid idea of his.

Twitter's Future Is a Return to Elon Musk's Past is a long form article based on this twitter thread:

 
My question for the police in this nonsense: “was anyone charged with a crime?” Cause if not, I think their argument is complete BS.

As of yet, no, I don't think any charges have been filed.

However, the search and seizures the police did during the raid as well as the search warrant were likely very illegal. The press has protections. Search warrants are only allowed as a very very last resort. And seizing is not allowed. They need to get materials handed over to them via discovery procedures.

Also, what really grinds me gears is despite all this. That damn restaurant owner still got her liquor license approved by the city council members in a 4 - 1 vote despite it being illegal to have a liquor licenses if you have any prior felony convictions. And the the restaurant owner did, a DWI conviction. And all this was to about trying to silence the media and threaten them of identify theft and illegal use of a computer charges.
 
As of yet, no, I don't think any charges have been filed.

However, the search and seizures the police did during the raid as well as the search warrant were likely very illegal. The press has protections. Search warrants are only allowed as a very very last resort. And seizing is not allowed. They need to get materials handed over to them via discovery procedures.

Also, what really grinds me gears is despite all this. That damn restaurant owner still got her liquor license approved by the city council members in a 4 - 1 vote despite it being illegal to have a liquor licenses if you have any prior felony convictions. And the the restaurant owner did, a DWI conviction. And all this was to about trying to silence the media and threaten them of identify theft and illegal use of a computer charges.
Reading the breakdown posted earlier, it doesn’t seem that simple. Like I said without charges… it’s all bullshit.

Also in Kansas a dui isn’t a felony until you’ve had three or four convictions.
 
Reading the breakdown posted earlier, it doesn’t seem that simple. Like I said without charges… it’s all bullshit.

Also in Kansas a dui isn’t a felony until you’ve had three or four convictions.

Hmm, then I wonder if they were implying she committed a felony while driver without a license after getting a DUI
 

Yeah, I was reading about that earlier. Courthouse denied the documents were correct, when pressed about the document # on the leaked paperwork, they stopped talking about it altogether. Evidently, Trump is already using the document in fundraising emails.
 
Back
Top