Political Discussion

RenegadeMonster said:
I wouldn't go that far. I understand the need to make monty. It's just the way the

I don't mind a couple ads, that's now why I use the ad blockers. It's the tracking and selling of my data that I do not consent to. If they gave me an option to opt out of that and just see ads, or buy a subscription I would do that.

But not giving the consumer an option and capturing and selling their data no matter what, even if they have a paid subscription is what I'm calling out.

So, if I don't get the option to opt out, I won't use the service. And to me, that is different than thinking I have the right to freely access that information without any method for them to generate cash.
Click to expand...

I think it’s pretty clear that targeted advertising actually generates real cash whereas blanket advertising is much less lucrative.

Part of the problem, with journalism in particular, is that to do it well and more importantly independently costs money, quite a lot of money. Good journalists can go down many dead ends looking for the important stories.

Do we pay and get quality independent journalism or do we allow disreputable rich interests and individuals to control the media and thus the narrative?

I agree you should he allows to opt out. I don’t agree that there is an onus to give you a service or information free once you do.
 
pitchfork.com

Olivia Rodrigo’s Management Bans Abortion Funds From Distributing Contraceptives on Guts Tour

Abortion funds invited to hand out supplies such as condoms and emergency contraception at shows must stand down, Rodrigo’s team reportedly said
pitchfork.com pitchfork.com

Man, when I was a teenager first going out to concerts it seemed standard practice to find someone at a table by the door pushing condoms on everyone. Not to exaggerate too much, but it felt like any place that expected young people to gather, there'd be someone distributing condoms and safe sex literature. Birth control is the next step after banning abortion. It's insane watching this fascism take hold.
 
Bull Shannon said:
pitchfork.com

Olivia Rodrigo’s Management Bans Abortion Funds From Distributing Contraceptives on Guts Tour

Abortion funds invited to hand out supplies such as condoms and emergency contraception at shows must stand down, Rodrigo’s team reportedly said
pitchfork.com pitchfork.com

Man, when I was a teenager first going out to concerts it seemed standard practice to find someone at a table by the door pushing condoms on everyone. Not to exaggerate too much, but it felt like any place that expected young people to gather, there'd be someone distributing condoms and safe sex literature. Birth control is the next step after banning abortion. It's insane watching this fascism take hold.
Click to expand...
Concerts are where I got my first condoms. I also miss at University of Colorado they had one of those old spinning chicken machines and out pops a plastic egg with condoms, lube, and a little pamphlet of sex tips for 25¢. But there were big bowls of free condoms and a group would come to the local shows in Boulder and hand out free bags of condoms too.
 
Bull Shannon said:
pitchfork.com

Olivia Rodrigo’s Management Bans Abortion Funds From Distributing Contraceptives on Guts Tour

Abortion funds invited to hand out supplies such as condoms and emergency contraception at shows must stand down, Rodrigo’s team reportedly said
pitchfork.com pitchfork.com

Man, when I was a teenager first going out to concerts it seemed standard practice to find someone at a table by the door pushing condoms on everyone. Not to exaggerate too much, but it felt like any place that expected young people to gather, there'd be someone distributing condoms and safe sex literature. Birth control is the next step after banning abortion. It's insane watching this fascism take hold.
Click to expand...
She's famous enough now that she should stand up for what's right. Fuck business and political pressure from the fascists. That would be the real example she should show to young people.
 
As far as I know, condoms are not age restricted in any state. Any kid of any age can buy them. I remember in high school working at a grocery store, and seeing 12 and 13 year olds buying them.

As for plan b, 25 states allow girls of any age to get without parental consent, and 24 states have some sort of restrictions for minors.

So, what is the big deal here? It's legal, and if something is not legal, like plan b in a certain state, just make sure you don't hand it out to minors to satisfy the conservatives. But I get they will not be satisfied. They want to protect their kids from knowing about sex, and abstinence is the only acceptable solution.

Reminds me of covid vaccinations in TN. It is legal for a minor to show up at a clinic and request a vaccination and that was happening when parents were antivaxx. However, when someone asked for clarification as to what they should do if a minor shows up asking for a vaccination without a parent and the state health whatever position answered "give them the vaccination", they were let go because it was made political, and that parents should have the choice. Even though that's not what the law said.
 
RenegadeMonster said:
So, what is the big deal here?
Click to expand...
It's the exact same playbook as drag storytime: "you're exposing children to sexuality and sexual content." This is the path to making contraception age-restricted. Possibly even the path to needing spousal approval to be on birth control. They are creating a moral panic around it in order to drum up support for codified restrictions targeting women.

They want to control women's bodies, impose "christian values" (read: patriarchal values), and keep a stable lower class of menial workers who can't get out from under the debt and obligations of raising a child. This will affect women and people of color the most, as (just like with abortion) people with privilege will be able to circumvent these laws.

These people don't actually believe there's a problem; they just know it's effective to point to your daughter's favorite pop star and declare she's corrupting them.
 
RenegadeMonster said:
Does he have CTE?
Click to expand...
I wouldn’t put it out of the realm of possibilities. I’d seen some of the stuff that he had said previously and it was obvious that he had been down the YouTube conspiracy theory rabbit hole but I was surprised at just how far down he went.

Like this is bonkers X-Files type stuff that is fun as Sci-Fi type fantasy but when it becomes someone’s honest belief system that is a whole other level.
 
Joe Mac said:
Both are awful companies. Fuck them. What comes in after can’t be worse.
Click to expand...
Last time I had to use one (I accidentally locked my keys in my car while at the record store, and had to have em take me across town to get my spare set) I knew it was gonna be a round trip so when I got in the car I asked the guy what he would charge off the books for the ride back and he was super happy to oblige. It save me $10 buck and he made $10 more than he would have if we went through the app.
 
TenderLovingKiller® said:
Last time I had to use one (I accidentally locked my keys in my car while at the record store, and had to have em take me across town to get my spare set) I knew it was gonna be a round trip so when I got in the car I asked the guy what he would charge off the books for the ride back and he was super happy to oblige. It save me $10 buck and he made $10 more than he would have if we went through the app.
Click to expand...

The whole way they work is just so shady. The put so many restrictions on the drivers that any court in a competent jurisdiction would find them to be employees but the exploitative bastards push hard to classify them as “self-employed” availing of a platform in an attempt to shirk so many responsibilities that arise from the employee employer relationship. I’d go as far as saying if it can be avoided never use them if you believe in the concept of workers rights and fair pay.
 
I knew my holding companies health benefits sucked and were below the national average, but is the same true for my 401k?

They have a maximum match of 4%. And you have to pay in 4% to get 4%. In additional, you get 1% match your first year, 2% match your second year and so until you hit the 4%.

In a discussion about 401k's I was following, I'm reading about people who have a 8% match after 3 years, and they only need to contribute 2.5% to get that 8%. That blows my mind that there are companies that generous out there.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top